Abstract
Special relativity is based on the apparent contradiction between two postulates, namely, Galilean vs. c-invariance. We show that anomalies ensue by holding the former postulate alone. In order for Galilean invariance to be consistent, it must hold not only for bodies’ motions, but also for the signals and forces they exchange. If the latter ones do not obey the Galilean version of the Velocities Addition Law, invariance is violated. If, however, they do, causal anomalies, information loss and conservation laws’ violations are bound to occur. These anomalies are largely remedied by introducing waves and fields that disobey Galilean invariance. Therefore, from these inconsistencies within classical mechanics, electromagnetism could be predicted before experiment proved its existence. Special relativity, it might be argued, would then follow naturally, either as a resolution of the resulting conflict or as an extrapolation of the path between the theories. We conclude with a review of earlier attempts to base SR on a single postulate, and point out the originality of the present work.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Einstein, A.: The Meaning of Relativity. London, Methuen (1951)
Petkov, V.: Relativity and the Nature of Spacetime. Springer, New York (2005)
Lévy-Leblond, J.-M.: One more derivation of the Lorentz transformation. Am. J. Phys. 43, 434 (1975). doi:10.1119/1.9807
Eisenstaedt, J.: From Newton to Einstein: A forgotten relativistic optics of moving bodies. Am. J. Phys. 75, 741 (2007). doi:10.1119/1.2742398
Norton, J.: Einstein’s investigations of Galilean covariant electrodynamics prior to 1905. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 59, 45 (2004). doi:10.1007/s00407-004-0085-6
Martínez, A.A.: Ritz, Einstein, and the Emission hypothesis. Phys. Perspect. 6, 4 (2004). doi:10.1007/s00016-003-0195-6
Mitvalský, V.: Special relativity without the postulate of constancy of light. Am. J. Phys. 34, 825 (1966). doi:10.1119/1.1973524
Lee, A.R., Kalotas, T.M.: Lorentz transformations from the first postulate. Am. J. Phys. 44, 271 (1976). doi:10.1119/1.10231
Behera, H.: A comment on the invariance of the speed of light. http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0304087v1 (2003)
Mermin, N.D.: Relativity without light. Am. J. Phys. 52, 120 (1984)
Hsu, J.-P., Hsu, L.: A Broader View of Relativity: General Implications of Lorentz and Poincare Invariance. World Scientific, Singapore (2006)
Sfarti, A.: Single-postulate theory of relativity and generalization of the clock synchronization principle. Phys. Essays 19, 355 (2006)
Feigenbaum, M.J.: The theory of relativity—Galileo’s child. http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.1234v1 (2008)
Gannett, J.W.: Nothing but relativity, redux. Eur. J. Phys. 28, 1145 (2007). doi:10.1088/0143-0807/28/6/011
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sela, O., Tamir, B., Dolev, S. et al. Can Special Relativity Be Derived from Galilean Mechanics Alone?. Found Phys 39, 499–509 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9301-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9301-1