Skip to main content
Log in

Can Special Relativity Be Derived from Galilean Mechanics Alone?

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Special relativity is based on the apparent contradiction between two postulates, namely, Galilean vs. c-invariance. We show that anomalies ensue by holding the former postulate alone. In order for Galilean invariance to be consistent, it must hold not only for bodies’ motions, but also for the signals and forces they exchange. If the latter ones do not obey the Galilean version of the Velocities Addition Law, invariance is violated. If, however, they do, causal anomalies, information loss and conservation laws’ violations are bound to occur. These anomalies are largely remedied by introducing waves and fields that disobey Galilean invariance. Therefore, from these inconsistencies within classical mechanics, electromagnetism could be predicted before experiment proved its existence. Special relativity, it might be argued, would then follow naturally, either as a resolution of the resulting conflict or as an extrapolation of the path between the theories. We conclude with a review of earlier attempts to base SR on a single postulate, and point out the originality of the present work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Einstein, A.: The Meaning of Relativity. London, Methuen (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Petkov, V.: Relativity and the Nature of Spacetime. Springer, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lévy-Leblond, J.-M.: One more derivation of the Lorentz transformation. Am. J. Phys. 43, 434 (1975). doi:10.1119/1.9807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eisenstaedt, J.: From Newton to Einstein: A forgotten relativistic optics of moving bodies. Am. J. Phys. 75, 741 (2007). doi:10.1119/1.2742398

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Norton, J.: Einstein’s investigations of Galilean covariant electrodynamics prior to 1905. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 59, 45 (2004). doi:10.1007/s00407-004-0085-6

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Martínez, A.A.: Ritz, Einstein, and the Emission hypothesis. Phys. Perspect. 6, 4 (2004). doi:10.1007/s00016-003-0195-6

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mitvalský, V.: Special relativity without the postulate of constancy of light. Am. J. Phys. 34, 825 (1966). doi:10.1119/1.1973524

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, A.R., Kalotas, T.M.: Lorentz transformations from the first postulate. Am. J. Phys. 44, 271 (1976). doi:10.1119/1.10231

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Behera, H.: A comment on the invariance of the speed of light. http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0304087v1 (2003)

  10. Mermin, N.D.: Relativity without light. Am. J. Phys. 52, 120 (1984)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hsu, J.-P., Hsu, L.: A Broader View of Relativity: General Implications of Lorentz and Poincare Invariance. World Scientific, Singapore (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Sfarti, A.: Single-postulate theory of relativity and generalization of the clock synchronization principle. Phys. Essays 19, 355 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Feigenbaum, M.J.: The theory of relativity—Galileo’s child. http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.1234v1 (2008)

  14. Gannett, J.W.: Nothing but relativity, redux. Eur. J. Phys. 28, 1145 (2007). doi:10.1088/0143-0807/28/6/011

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avshalom C. Elitzur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sela, O., Tamir, B., Dolev, S. et al. Can Special Relativity Be Derived from Galilean Mechanics Alone?. Found Phys 39, 499–509 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9301-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9301-1

Keywords

Navigation