Skip to main content
Log in

The Scope of Turing's Analysis of Effective Procedures

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Turing's (1936) analysis of effective symbolic procedures is a model of conceptual clarity that plays an essential role in the philosophy of mathematics. Yet appeal is often made to the effectiveness of human procedures in other areas of philosophy. This paper addresses the question of whether Turing's analysis can be applied to a broader class of effective human procedures. We use Sieg's (1994) presentation of Turing's Thesis to argue against Cleland's (1995) objections to Turing machines and we evaluate her proposal to understand the effectiveness of procedures in terms of their reliability and precision. A number of conditions for effectiveness are identified and these are used to provide a general argument against the possibility of a Leibnizian decision procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Church, A. (1936), 'An Unsolvable Problem in Elementary Number Theory', American Journal of Mathematics 58, pp. 345–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, C. (1995), 'Effective Procedures and Computable Functions', Minds and Machines 5, pp. 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, C. (2001), 'Recipes, Algorithms, and Programs', Minds and Machines 11(2), pp. 219–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, D. (1985), 'Quantum Theory, the Church-Turing Principle and the Universal Quantum Computer', Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A. 400, pp 97–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R. (1982), 'Simulating Physics with Computers', International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21, pp 467–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1879), Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formel-sprache des reinen Denkens, Halle: Verlag Louis Nebert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandy, R. (1980), 'Church's Thesis and Principles for Mechanisms', in K. Barwise and Kunen, eds., The Kleene Symposium, North-Holland, pp. 123–148.

  • Gödel, K. (1934), 'On Undecidable Propositions of Formal Mathematical Systems', Lecture Notes, Princeton. Republished in Gödel (1986), pp. 346–371.

  • Gödel, K. (1986), Collected Works, Volume 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, D. and Ackermann W. (1928), Crundzüge der theoretischen Logik, Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, A. (1983), Alan Turing: The Enigma, Burnett Books Ltd.

  • Lucas, J. R. (1961), 'Minds, Machines and Gödel', Philosophy 86, pp. 112–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M. (1967), Computation: Finite and Infinite Machines, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. (1989), The Emperor's New Mind, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieg, W. (1994), 'Mechanical Procedures and Mathematical Experience', in A. George, ed., Mathematics and Mind, Chapter 4, Oxford University Press, pp. 71–117.

  • Turing, A. (1936), 'On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblein', Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 45, pp. 230–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1980), Remarks on the Philosophy of Religion, Volume 1, Blackwell.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seligman, J. The Scope of Turing's Analysis of Effective Procedures. Minds and Machines 12, 203–220 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015638814511

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015638814511

Navigation