Skip to main content
Log in

‘Fitness’ and ‘altruism’: Traps for the unwary, bystander and biologist alike

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At one level, this paper is a lament and a warning. I lament biologists borrowing well-known terms and then drastically and awkwardly changing their meanings, and I warn about the mischief this does. Biology's public image is at stake, as is its general usefulness. At another level, I attempt to clarify the misnamed concepts, beyond what has been achieved in recent philosophical writings. This helps to account for the mischief, and to see how it might be avoidable. But the most important thing about the paper is that, at a third level, it is an argument against physicalism and materialism, especially those variants which deny the autonomy of organisms and the existence of intrinsic goods. Interpreting biology from the point of view of those denials leads to unsatisfactory and even bizarre results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bateson, Patrick P.G.: 1982, ‘Behavioural development and evolutionary processes’, in King's College Sociobiology Group (1982), pp. 133–151.

  • Bronowski, J.: 1977,A Sense of the Future, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burian, Richard M.: 1983, “‘Adaptation’”, in Marjorie Grene (ed.),Dimensions of Darwinism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Donald T.: 1974, ‘“Downward Causation” in Hierarchically Organized Biological Systems’,Studies in the Philosophy of Biology, Ayala, F.J. and T. Dobzhansky (eds.), University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles: 1859,The Origin of Species.

  • Dawkins, Richard: 1976,The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, Richard: 1982,The Extended Phenotype, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, Richard: 1986,The Blind Watchmaker, Longmans, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T., F.J. Ayala, et al.: 1977,Evolution.

  • Dunbar, R.I.M.: 1982, ‘Adaptation, fitness and the evolutionary tautology’, in King's College Sociobilogy Group (1982), pp. 9–28.

  • Fisher, R.A.: 1930,The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Oxford, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth, Alan: 1977,Reason and Morality, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen Jay: 1977,Ever Since Darwin, W.W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen Jay: 1980, ‘Caring Groups and Selfish Genes’, in Elliott Sober (ed.) (1984a), pp. 119–124.

  • Kimbrough, Steven O.: 1980, ‘The concepts of fitness and selection in evolutionary biology’,Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 3, pp. 149–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • King's College Sociobiology Group, Cambridge, ed.: 1982,Current Problems in Sociobiology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, John L.: 1974,The Cement of the Universe, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, John L.: 1977,Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair: 1981,After Virtue, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst: 1982,The Growth of Biological Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgeley, Mary: 1979,Beast and Man, Harvester Press, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, Susan and John Beatty: 1979, ‘The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness’,Philosophy of Science, 46, 263–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, Iris: 1970,The Sovereignty of Good, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster, George F. and Edward O. Wilson: 1978, ‘A Critique of Optimization Theory in Evolutionary Biology’, in Elliott Sober (ed.) 1984a.

  • Popper, Sir Karl R.: 1959a,The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Sir Karl R.: 1959b, ‘The Propensity Interpretation of Probability’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10, pp. 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Sir Karl R.: 1972,Objective Knowledge, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Sir Karl R. and Sir John Eccles: 1977,The Self and Its Brain, Springer International, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, Holmes, III: 1982, ‘Are Values in Nature Subjective or Objective?’,Environmental Ethics,4, 125–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Alexander: 1978, ‘Supervenience of Biological Concepts’,Philosophy of Science,45, 368–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Alexander: 1985,The Structure of Biological Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, D.L.: 1982, ‘Risk, uncertainty and evolutionary strategies’, in King's College Sociobiology Group (1982), pp. 91–111.

  • Settle, Tom: 1973, ‘Are some Propensities Probabilities?’, in R.J. Bogdan and I. Niiniluoto (eds.),Logic, Language, and Probability, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 115–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settle, Tom: 1974, ‘Induction and Probability Unfused’, in P.A. Schilpp (ed.),The Philosophy of Karl R. Popper, Open Court, La Salle, pp. 697–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settle, Tom: 1975, ‘Presuppositions of Propensity Theories of Probability’, in G. Maxwell and R. Anderston (eds.),Induction, Probability, and Confirmation, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 388–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settle, Tom: 1982, ‘Indeterminism Undermines Science’,Fundamenta Scientia 3, 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settle, Tom: 1983, ‘What Biology cannot teach us about Ethics’, inAbsolute Values and the Creation of the New World, International Cultural Foundation Press, New York, 1209–1232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settle, Tom: 1989, ‘Van Rooijen and Mayr versus Popper: Is the Universe Causally Closed?’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40, 389–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settle, Tom: 1990, ‘How to Avoid Implying that Physicalism is True: A Problem for Teachers of Science’,International Journal of Science Education 12, 258–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, Elliott (ed.): 1984a,Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, Elliott: 1984b,The Nature of Evolution, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Herbert: 1864,Principles of Biology.

  • Taylor, Charles: 1989,Sources of the Self, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E.A.: 1982, ‘Gene competition without selection’, King's College Sociobilogy Group (1982), pp. 113–131.

  • Trivers, Robert: 1971, ‘The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism’,The Quarterly Review of Biology 46, pp. 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O.: 1975,Sociobiology, Belknap Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O.: 1978,On Human Nature, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

David Hull made wonderful criticisms of an early draft, for which many thanks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Settle, T. ‘Fitness’ and ‘altruism’: Traps for the unwary, bystander and biologist alike. Biol Philos 8, 61–83 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868506

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868506

Key Words

Navigation