Cartesian Egalitarianism: From Poullain de la Barre to Rancière

Authors

  • DEVIN ZANE SHAW University of Ottawa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22329/p.v7i1.3368

Abstract

This essay presents an overview of what I call “Cartesian egalitarianism,” a current of political thought that runs from François Poullain de la Barre, through Simone de Beauvoir, to Jacques Rancière. The impetus for this egalitarianism, I argue, is derived from Descartes’ supposition that “good sense” or “reason” is equally distributed among all people. Although Descartes himself limits the egalitarian import of this supposition, I claim that we can nevertheless identify three features of this subsequent tradition or tendency. First, Cartesian egalitarians think political agency as a practice of subjectivity. Second, they share the supposition that there is an equality of intelligences and abilities shared by all human beings. Third, these thinkers conceptualize politics as a processing of a wrong, meaning that politics initiates new practices through which those who were previously oppressed assert themselves as self-determining political subjects.

Author Biography

DEVIN ZANE SHAW, University of Ottawa

Devin Zane Shaw teaches in the Department of Philosophy and Department of Visual Arts at the University of Ottawa. He is the author of Freedom and Nature in Schelling's Philosophy of Art (Continuum, 2010).

Downloads

Published

2012-05-26

Issue

Section

Articles