Mental manipulations and the problem of causal exclusion

21Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Christian List and Peter Menzies 2009 have looked to interventionist theories of causation for an answer to Jaegwon Kim's causal exclusion problem. Important to their response is the idea of realization-insensitivity. However, this idea becomes mired in issues concerning multiple realization, leaving it unable to fulfil its promise to block exclusion. After explaining why realization-insensitivity fails as a solution to Kim's problem, I look to interventionism to describe a different kind of solution. © 2012 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shapiro, L. A. (2012). Mental manipulations and the problem of causal exclusion. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 90(3), 507–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2011.601749

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free