Skip to main content
Log in

The nature of insight

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Greeks had a ready answer for what happens when the mind suddenly finds the answer to a question for which it had been searching: insight was regarded as a gift of the Muses, its origins were ‘divine’. It served to highlight the Greeks' belief that there are some things which are not meant to be scientifically explained. The essence of insight is that it comes from some supernatural source: unpredicted and unfettered. In other words, the origins of insight are unconscious, and hence, unexplainable. Wittgenstein felt that, as long as there continues to be a noun expression like ‘to have a moment of insight’ which functions in the same way as the expression ‘to have a hunger pang’, thereby inducing us to treat ‘moment of insight’ as the name of an experience, then “people will keep stumbling over the same puzzling difficulties and find themselves staring at something which no explanation seems capable of clearing up.” To the founders of AI, this argument reeked of obscurantism. The moment of insight, they felt, is indeed a mystery, but it is one that begs to be explained in causal terms. Indeed, the problem of insight served as one of the leading problems in the evolution of AI. Hence anyone interested in the foundations of AI is compelled to examine the manner in which the early pioneers of the field sought to explain the ‘eureka experience’. In this paper I will look at some of the key conceptual developments which paved the way for Newell and Simon's theory of GPS: the fundamental changes in the notion of the unconscious — the emergence of the ‘cognitive unconscious’ — which took place in the nineteenth- and early twentieth-century. In so doing, I hope to clarify what Wittgenstein may have had in mind in his strictures against mechanist attempts to analyse the nature of insight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldwin, James Mark (1889),Handbook of Psychology. New York, Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, William (1891),Principles of Mental Physiology. New York, D. Appleton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, W.G. and Ericsson, K.A. (1981), ‘Skilled Memory’, in J.R. Anderson (ed.)Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition. Hillsdale, New Jersey, Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobbe, Frances Power (1883), ‘Unconscious Cerebration’, inDarwinism in Morals. (Boston, George H. Ellis).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, Adriaan D. (1965),Thought and Choice in Chess. The Hague, Mouton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel (1983), ‘Artificial Intelligence and the Strategies of Psychological Investigation’ in Jonathan Miller (ed.)States of Mind. New York, Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberger, Henri (1970),The Discovery of the Unconscious. New York, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R.L. (1986),Odd Perceptions. London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, Howard E. (1981a),Darwin on Man, 2nd edn. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, Howard E. (1981b), ‘On the relation between “Aha Experiences” and the construction of ideas’,History of Science, vol. xix.

  • Hadamard, Jacques (1945),The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. New York, Dover Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz, Hermann von (1971),Selected Writings of Hermann von Helmholtz, Russell Kahl (ed.). Middletown, Connecticut, Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz, Hermann von (1977),Epistemological Writings, R.S. Cohen and Y. Elkana (eds), Malcolm F. Lowe (trans.) Dordrecht, D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, Michael J.A. (1989),Fragments of Genius, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, William (1879), ‘Are We Automata’,Mind, no. 13.

  • James, William (1890),Principles of Psychology. London, Constable & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1988),The Computer and the Mind. London, Fontana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P.N. and Ruth M.J. Byrne (1991),Deduction. Hillsdale Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

  • Ketner, Kenneth Laine (1988), ‘Peirce and Turing: Comparisons and Conjectures’,Semiotica 68, pp. 33–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, D. B. (1977),The Unconscious: Invention or Discover?. Santa Monica, California Goodyear Publishing Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montmasson, Joseph-Marie (1931),Invention and the Unconscious, H. Stafford Hatfield (trans). London, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münsterberg, Hugoet al. (1910),Subconscious Phenomena. Boston, Richard G. Badger, The Gorham Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, Allen and Herbert A. Simon (1957), ‘The Logic Theory Machine: A Complex Information Processing System’,Transactions on Information Theory (Institute of Radio Engineers).

  • Newell, Allen and Herbert A. Simon (1956),Problem-Solving in Humans and Computers. Santa Monica, California, RAND Corporation Paper P-987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, Allen and Herbert A. Simon (1961a), ‘Computer Simulation of Human Thinking’,Science, vol. 134.

  • Newell, Allen and Herbert A. Simon (1961b), ‘GPS, A Program that Simulates Human Thought’, in Edward A. Feigenbaum (ed.),Computers and Thought. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, Allen and Herbert A. Simon (1961c), ‘The Simulation of Human Thought’, inCurrent Trends in Psychological Theory. Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, Allen and Herbert A. Simon (1962), ‘The Processes of Creative Thinking’, in Simon 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, Allen, J.C. Shaw, and Herbert A. Simon (1958), ‘Elements of a Theory of Human Problem Solving’,Psychological Review, vol. 65.

  • Newell, Allen, J. C. Shaw, and Herbert A. Simon (1959), ‘The Processes of Creative Thinking’, P-1320 (Santa Monica, California, The Rand Corporation, September 16, 1958, Revised January 28, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, Henri (1913), ‘Mathematical Creation’, inThe Foundations of Science, G. Bruce Halsted (trans). New York: The Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevrin, Howard and Scott Dickman (1980), ‘The Psychological Unconscious’,American Psychologist, vol. 35.

  • Simon, Herbert A. (1961), ‘Modelling Human Mental Processes’, inProceedings of the Western Joint Computer Conference, May 9–11, 1961.

  • Simon, Herbert A. (1966), ‘Scientific discovery and the psychology of problem solving’, in Simon 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. (1977),Models of Discovery. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. (1978), ‘Information processing theory of human problem solving’, in W.K. Estes (ed.),Handbook of Learning and Cognitive Processes, vol. 5. Hillsdale, New Jersey, Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. (1979),Models of Thought. New Haven, Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloboda, John A. (1985),The Musical Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, Robert J. (1988),The Nature of Creativity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, Alan (1950), ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’, in Alan Ross Anderson (ed.),Minds and Machines. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitruvius (1934),On Architecture, Frank Granger (trans). Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hartmann, Eduard (1931)Philosophy of the Unconscious. New York, Harcourt, Brace and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallas, Graham (1926)The Art of Thought. London, Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Richard M. and Roslyn P. Warren (eds.) (1968),Helmholtz on Perception. New York, John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, Robert W. (1986),Creativity: Genius and Other Myths. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, Robert W. (1988), ‘Problem solving and creativity’, in Robert J. Sternberg,The Nature of Creativity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953),Philosophical Investigations, G.E.M. Anscombe (trans.), 3rd edition. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1980),Culture and Value, G.H. von Wright (ed.), Peter Winch (trans.). Oxford, Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shanker, S.G. The nature of insight. Mind Mach 5, 561–581 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974986

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00974986

Key words

Navigation