Elsevier

Cognition

Volume 46, Issue 1, January 1993, Pages 1-51
Cognition

Children are in control,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(93)90021-MGet rights and content

Abstract

We argue on the basis of recent experimental results that modular principles of universal grammar (UG) play a continuous role in the first language acquisition of control. Our results involve both comprehension and production data from 108 3- to 8-year old children who are acquiring English. The results provide evidence against the hypothesis that there is a “stage” at which children do not know fundamental grammatical principles of control, or fail to apply the basic structural analysis relevant to control. We suggest that previous proposals for this hypothesis have been misled by (1) attention to only one aspect of the knowledge of control, namely choice of antecedent in comprehension of the embedded null subject in these structures and (2) misinterpretation of the nature of the principle by which children overgeneralize the choice of object as antecedent in control structures. Although the new results do replicate delay in acquisition with the unique subject- control verb “promise”, they suggest that this delay is caused by a need to integrate modular principles of UG with language-specific principles by which the lexicon and syntax (constituent structure and case) are related. The overgeneralization of choice of object as antecedent is shown to reflect a continuous principle of syntactic minimality.

References (82)

  • J. Huang

    On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns

    Linguistic Inquiry

    (1984)
  • E. Bach

    Control in Montague grammar

    Linguistic Inquiry

    (1979)
  • H. Borer et al.

    The maturation of syntax

  • D. Bouchard

    On the content of empty categories

    (1984)
  • J. Bowers

    Grammatical relations

    (1972)
  • J. Bowers

    The theory of grammatical relations

    (1981)
  • J. Bowers

    Grammatical relations

    (1986)
  • J. Bowers

    A structural theory of predication

    (1989)
  • J. Bowers

    The syntax and semantics of predication

    (1990)
  • J. Bresnan

    Control and complementation

  • Y.-C. Chien et al.

    The concepts of topic and subject in first language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese

    Child Development

    (1985)
  • G. Chierchia

    Topics in the syntax and semantics of infinitives and gerunds

  • G. Chierchia et al.

    Local and long distance control

  • C. Chomsky

    The acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10

    (1969)
  • N. Chomsky

    On binding

    Linguistic Inquiry

    (1980)
  • N. Chomsky

    Lectures on government and binding

    (1981)
  • N. Chomsky

    Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding

    (1982)
  • N. Chomsky

    Language and problems of knowledge: The Managua lectures

    (1986)
  • S. Crain et al.

    Acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora

  • J. Eisele

    Meaning and form in children's judgment about language

  • J. Eisele et al.

    Children's knowledge about pronouns: A study of the “truth value judgment task”

    (1990)
  • N.W. Francis et al.

    Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar

    (1982)
  • J.W. Gair

    Kinds of markedness

  • J. Gair et al.

    Acquisition of null subjects and control in some Sinhala adverbial clauses

    Papers and Reports on Child Language Development

    (1989)
  • R. Gelman et al.

    A review of some Piagetian concepts

  • L. Gleitman

    The structural sources of verb meanings

    Language Acquisition

    (1990)
  • H. Goodluck

    Linguistic principles in children's grammar of complement interpretation

    Reproduced by the Graduate Linguistic Student Association, Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts...
  • J. Grimshaw

    Getting the dative alternation

    MIT Working Papers in Linguistics

    (1989)
  • J. Grimshaw et al.

    Knowledge and obedience: The developmental status of the binding theory

    Linguistic Inquiry

    (1990)
  • K. Hale

    The syntax of lexical word formation

  • J. Hsu

    The development of structural principles related to complement subject interpretation

    (1981)
  • J.R. Hsu et al.

    Control and coreference in early child language

    Journal of Child Language

    (1989)
  • J.R. Hsu et al.

    The development of grammars underlying children's interpretation of complex sentences

    Cognition

    (1985)
  • J. Huang

    Pro drop in Chinese: A generalized control theory

  • Kapur, S., Lust, B., Harbert, W., & Martohardjono, G. (to appear). Universal grammar and learnability theory: The case...
  • D. Kaufman

    Grammatical and cognitive interactions in the study of children's knowledge of binding theory and reference relations

  • R. Kayne

    On certain differences between French and English

    Linguistic Inquiry

    (1981)
  • G. Klein et al.

    Type-driven translation

    Linguistic and Philosophy

    (1985)
  • J. Koster

    The invariant core of language

    Theoretical Linguistic Research

    (1985)
  • J. Koster et al.

    On the constituency of infinitives

    Language

    (1982)
  • B. Landau et al.

    Language and experience: Evidence from the blind child

    (1985)
  • Cited by (35)

    • Intact grammar in HFA? Evidence from control and binding

      2015, Lingua
      Citation Excerpt :

      We turn now to double-complement subject control (promise) for which there was a varied performance, especially in the HFA children and their language-matched control group with estimated mean probabilities correct of .70 and .77, respectively. First of all, our finding supports all the studies that have tracked this construction's development in TD children (e.g. Hsu et al., 1989; Cohen Sherman and Lust, 1993; Eisenberg and Cairns, 1994). The promise sentences proved exceptionally difficult for only a proportion of our HFA group.

    • Control in Mandarin-speaking children's early naturalistic production

      2015, Lingua
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our focus is complement control, therefore, other types of control (e.g. adjunct control) will not be explored in this paper. Children's comprehension of control has been extensively studied (e.g. Adler, 2006; Broihier and Wexler, 1995; Cairns et al., 1994; Chomsky, 1969; Sherman and Lust, 1993; Eisenberg and Cairns, 1994; Goodluck, 1981, 2001; Goodluck et al., 2001; Hsu et al., 1985; Kirby, 2009; Maratsos, 1974; McDaniel et al., 1991). English-speaking children generally understand complement control sentences (with verbs such as ask, tell, want, and try) by age 3–4; however, they have problems interpreting sentences with the verb promise (e.g. Sherman and Lust, 1993; Eisenberg and Cairns, 1994; Kirby, 2009; Maratsos, 1974).

    • Effects of discourse on control

      2017, Journal of Linguistics
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The research reported here was supported in part by a Dissertation Award to the first author from the College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, and by a National Science Foundation Grant BNS 7825115 to the second author. Preparation of this manuscript was supported by the Massachusetts General Hospital Neuropsychology Laboratory under NIH Grant 00942.

    ☆☆

    A version of this paper was first presented in October 1988 at the 13th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.

    We thank Professor James Gair, John Bowers and Steven Pinker and Drs. David Caplan and Karin Stromswald for insightful comments on an earlier version of this paper; Joyce Nelsen for invaluable assistance in data collection, transcription and scoring; and Gita Martohardjono, Kweeock Lee and Nancy Gabriel for information regarding Indonesian, Korean and French, respectively. We also thank three anonymous reviewers for detailed comments.

    View full text