Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T16:59:22.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Co-critical points of elementary embeddings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Michael Sheard*
Affiliation:
University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska 99701
*
Department of Mathematics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210

Extract

Probably the two most famous examples of elementary embeddings between inner models of set theory are the embeddings of the universe into an inner model given by a measurable cardinal and the embeddings of the constructible universe L into itself given by 0#. In both of these examples, the “target model” is a subclass of the “ground model” (and in the latter case they are equal). It is not hard to find examples of embeddings in which the target model is not a subclass of the ground model: if is a generic ultrafilter arising from forcing with a precipitous ideal on a successor cardinal κ, then the ultraproduct of the ground model via collapses κ. Such considerations suggest a classification of how close the target model comes to “fitting inside” the ground model.

Definition 1.1. Let M and N be inner models (transitive, proper class models) of ZFC, and let j: MN be an elementary embedding. The co-critical point of j is the least ordinal λ, if any exist, such that there is Xλ, XN but XM. Such an X is called a new subset of λ.

It is easy to see that the co-critical point of j: MN is a cardinal in N.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Dodd, A. J., The core model, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 61, Cambridge University Press, London, 1982.Google Scholar
[2] Jech, T., Set theory, Academic Press, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
[3] Kanamori, A. and Magidor, M., The evolution of large cardinal axioms in set theory, Higher set theory (Proceedings, Oberwolfach, 1977), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 669, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1978, pp. 99275.Google Scholar
[4] Kunen, K., Saturated ideals, this Journal, vol. 43 (1978), pp. 6576.Google Scholar
[5] Magidor, M., How large is the first strongly compact cardinal? Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 10 (1976), pp. 3357.Google Scholar
[6] Mitchell, W., Sets constructible from sequences of ultrafilters, this Journal, vol. 39 (1974), pp. 5766.Google Scholar
[7] Solovay, R., Real-valued measurable cardinals, Axiomatic set theory, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 13, part 1, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1971, pp. 397428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar