Abstract
An onslaught of ethically questionable actions by top government, business, and religious leaders during the 1980s has brought the issue of ethics in decision making to the forefront of public consciousness. This study examines the ethical orientation of university students in four decision-making situations. The dependent variable — ethical orientation toward work-related decisions — is measured through student responses to questions following four work-related vignettes. Possible responses to each vignette are structured to permit categorization of respondents into two broad orientations: egoistic and ethical. Independent variables are academic major, “ethics in business orientation,” gender, and religiosity. Generally, students tended to choose an ethical orientation over an egoistic orientation in each vignette. Business majors were generally no less likely to choose an ethical orientation toward work-related decisions than nonbusiness majors. Respondents characterized by “moral unity” (belief in the consistency between general ethical principles and work-related ethical standards) were more likely to have an ethical orientation toward work-related decisions than those subscribing to the “amoral theory of business.” Females showed a consistent tendency to be more ethically oriented toward work-related decisions than males. Finally, respondents high on religiosity tended to be more ethically oriented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baumrind D.: 1988, ‘Sex Differences in Moral Reasoning: Response to Walker's Conclusion That There are None’, Child Development 57, 511–21.
Betz, M., L. O'Connell, and J. M. Shepard: 1989, ‘Gender Differences in Proclivity for Unethical Behavior’, Journal of Business Ethics, forthcoming.
Boyd, C.: 1987, ‘The Individualistic Ethic and the Design of Organizations’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 145–51.
Gilligan, C.: 1982, In a Different Voice (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA).
Henkoff, R.: 1989, ‘Is Greed Dead?’, Fortune (August 14), 40–9.
Jones, T. M. and F. H. Gautschi, III: 1988, ‘Will the Ethics of Business Change? A Survey of Future Executives’, Journal of Business Ethics 7, 231–48.
Kohlberg, L.: 1969, ‘Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach to Socialization,’ in D. A. Coslin ed., Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, (Rand McNally, Chicago).
Lifton, P. D.: 1985, ‘Individual Differences in Moral Development: The Relation of Sex, Gender, and Personality to Morality’, Journal of Personality 2, 306–34.
McLoughlin, M.: 1987, ‘A Nation of Liars?’ U.S. News & World Report February 23, 1987, 54–60.
Miller, A.: 1989, ‘The New Volunteers’, Newsweek July 10, 1989, 36–38.
Moser, M. R.: 1988, ‘Ethical Conflict at Work: A Critique of the Literature and Recommendations for Future Research’, Journal of Business Ethics 7, 381–87.
Putney, S. and R. Middleton: 1961, ‘Dimensions of Religious Ideology’, Social Forces 39, 285–90.
Rachels, J.: 1986, The Elements of Moral Philosophy (Random House, New York).
Rothbart, M. K. et al.: 1986, ‘Gender Differences in Moral Reasoning’, Sex Roles 15, 645–53.
Schlesinger, A. M., Jr.: 1986, The Cycles of American History (Houghton-Mifflin, Boston).
Steiner, G. A. and J. F. Steiner: 1988, Business, Government, and Society, 5th ed. (Random House, New York).
Walker, L. J.: 1984, ‘Sex Differences in the Development of Moral Reasoning: A Critical Review’, Child Development 55, 677–91.
Wood, J. A., J. G. McKinney, and C. W. Moore: 1988, ‘Ethical Attutudes of Students and Business Professionals: A Study of Moral Reasoning’, Journal of Business Ethics 7, 249–57.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Jon M. Shepard is Head of the Department of Management at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. His most recent publications include “Gender Differences in Proclivity for Unethical Behavior” (Journal of Business Ethics). His current research interests include ethics in business, corporate ethical climates, and the accountability of institutions in modern society.
Linda Hartenian is a P/HRM doctoral candidate in the Department of Management at the University of Kentucky. Her research interests include the performance appraisal process, the impact of decentralized computing systems on organizational communication, and research methodology.
This research was supported by a grant from the Graduate School, University of Kentucky. We wish to thank Richard Wokutch for his thoughtful suggestions for this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shepard, J.M., Hartenian, L.S. Egoistic and ethical orientations of university students toward work-related decisions. J Bus Ethics 10, 303–310 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382970
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382970