Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Levels of selection and the formal Darwinism project

  • Published:
Biology & Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding good design requires addressing the question of what units undergo natural selection, thereby becoming adapted. There is, therefore, a natural connection between the formal Darwinism project (which aims to connect population genetics with the evolution of design and fitness maximization) and levels of selection issues. We argue that the formal Darwinism project offers contradictory and confusing lines of thinking concerning level(s) of selection. The project favors multicellular organisms over both the lower (cell) and higher (social group) levels as the level of adaptation. Grafen offers four reasons for giving such special status to multicellular organisms: (1) they lack appreciable within-organism cell selection, (2) they have multiple features that appear contrived for the same purpose, (3) they possess a set of phenotypes, and (4) they leave offspring according to their phenotypes. We discuss why these rationales are not compelling and suggest that a more even-handed approach, in which multicellular organisms are not assumed to have special status, would be desirable for a project that aims to make progress on the foundations of evolutionary theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boven MVAN, Weissing FJ (1999) Segregation distortion in a deme-structured population: opposing demands of gene, individual and group selection. J Evol Biol 12:80–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss LW (1987) The evolution of individuality. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster KR (2011) The sociobiology of molecular systems. Nat Rev Genet 12:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner A, Grafen A (2009) Capturing the superorganism: a formal theory of group adaptation. J Evol Biol 22:659–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P (2008) Conditions for evolution by natural selection. J Philos 104:489–516

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (2002) A first formal link between the Price equation and an optimization program. J Theor Biol 217:75–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (2006) Optimization of inclusive fitness. J Theor Biol 238:541–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (2007) The formal Darwinism project: a mid-term report. J Evol Biol 20:1243–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (2014) The formal darwinism project in outline. Biol Philos 29(2). doi:10.1007/s10539-013-9414-y

  • Hamilton WD (1963) The evolution of altruistic behavior. Am Nat 97:354–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour I & II. J Theor Biol 7:1–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1970) Selfish and spiteful behaviour in an evolutionary model. Nature 228:1218–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1975) Innate social aptitudes of man: an approach from evolutionary genetics. In: Fox R (ed) Biosocial anthropology. Wiley, New York, pp 133–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1996) Narrow roads of gene land. I. Evolution of social behavior. W.H. Freeman, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Herron MD, Rashidi A, Shelton DE, Driscoll WW (2013) Cellular differentiation and individuality in the ‘minor’ multicellular taxa. Biol Rev 88:844–861. doi:10.1111/brv.12031

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr B, Godfrey-Smith P (2002) Individualist and multi-level perspectives on selection in structured populations. Biol Philos 17:477–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1970) The units of selection. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 1:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1981) Will a sexual population evolve to an ESS? Am Nat 117:1015–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Szathmáry E (1995) The major transitions in evolution. Freeman, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Michod RE (1999) Darwinian dynamics. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Monro K, Poore A (2009) The potential for evolutionary responses to cell-lineage selection on growth form and its plasticity in a red seaweed. Am Nat 173:151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okasha S (2006) Evolution and the levels of selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Okasha S, Paternotte C (2012) Group adaptation, formal Darwinism and contextual analysis. J Evol Biol 25:1127–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paley W (1802) Natural theology: or, evidence of the existence and attributes of the deity. Gould and Lincoln, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Price G (1970) Selection and covariance. Nature 227:520–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC (2000) Relatedness and the fraternal major transitions. Philos T R Soc B 355:1647–1655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS, Stein JC, Wei F, Pasternak S, Liang C et al (2009) The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 326:1112–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton DE, Michod RE (2014) Group selection and group adaptation during a major evolutionary transition: insights from the evolution of multicellularity in the volvocine algae. Biol Theory. doi:10.1007/s13752-014-0159-x

  • Sober E, Wilson DS (2011) Adaptation and natural selection revisited. J Evol Biol 24:462–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1969) Evolution and the genetics of populations. A treatise in three volumes, vol 2 The theory of gene frequencies. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA

    Deborah E. Shelton & Richard E. Michod

Authors
  1. Deborah E. Shelton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard E. Michod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah E. Shelton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shelton, D.E., Michod, R.E. Levels of selection and the formal Darwinism project. Biol Philos 29, 217–224 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-013-9420-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-013-9420-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation