Abstract
It is widely held that it is difficult, if not impossible, to apply causal theory to the domain of quantum mechanics. However, there are several recent scientific explanations that appeal crucially to quantum processes, and which are most naturally construed as causal explanations. They come from two relatively new fields: quantum biology and quantum technology. We focus on two examples, the explanation for the optical interferometer LIGO and the explanation for the avian magneto-compass. We analyse the explanation for the avian magneto-compass from the perspective of Woodward's interventionist theory and provide a causal model. Furthermore, we show how worries expressed by Woodward about quantum causation are circumvented in these cases, concluding that these kinds of explanations are most naturally construed as causal.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Whilst we use Woodward’s interventionist theory to support the conclusion that these explanations are causal, we are not committed to this being the only applicable causal theory. As an example, it is likely that Dowe’s Conserved Quantity theory will also be applicable in this context; the details of energetic transfer suggested by the Hamiltonian mechanical description of the system dynamics will likely pick out similar causal relata and relations.
References
Abbott, B., Abbott, R., Adhikari, R., & Ajith, P. (2009). LIGO: the laser interferometer gravitational-wave observatory. Reports on Progress in Physics, 104, 220502.
Bandyopadhyay, J. N., Paterek, T., & Kaszlikowski, D. (2012). Quantum coherence and sensitivity of avian magneto reception. Physical Review Letters, 109(11), 110502.
Cai, J., & Plenio, M.B. (2013). ‘Chemical compass for avian magneto reception as a quantum coherent device’, http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.4143.
Cai, J., Guerreschi, G. G., & Briegel, H. J. (2010). Quantum control and entanglement in a chemical compass. Physical Review Letters, 104(22), 220502.
Campbell, R. J., & Bickhard, M. H. (2011). Physicalism, emergence and downward causation. Axiomathes, 21(1), 33–56.
Craver, C. (2009). Explaining the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2003). ‘Quantum technology: the second quantum revolution’, philosophical transactions of the royal society A: mathematical. Physical and Engineering Sciences, 361(1809), 1655–1674.
Fleming, G. R., Scholes, G. D., & Cheng, Y.-C. (2011). Quantum effects in biology. Procedia Chemistry, 3(1), 38–57.
Frisch, M. (2012). No place for causes? causal skepticism in physics. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2(93), 313–336.
Hausman, D. M., & Woodward, J. (1999). Independence, invariance and the causal Markov condition. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50(4), 521–583.
Huelga, S., & Plenio, M. (2013). ‘Vibrations, quanta and biology’, http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.3530.
Kim, J. (1999). Making sense of emergence. Philosophical Studies, 95(1/2), 3–36.
Lambert, N., Chen, Y. N., Cheng, Y.-C., Li, C.-M., Chen, G.-Y., & Nori, F. (2012). Quantum biology. Nature Physics, 9(1), 10–18.
Milburn, G. J. (2005). ‘Foundations of quantum technology’. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 2(2), 161–179.
Norton, J. D. (2007). ‘Causation as folk science’. In H. Price & R. Corry (Eds.), Causation, physics, and the constitution of reality: Russell’s republic revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning and inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robledo, L., Childress, L., Hannes, B., Hensen, B., Alkemade, P. F., & Hanson, R. (2011). High-fidelity projective read-out of a solid-state spin quantum register. Nature, 477, 574–578.
Rodgers, C. T., & Hore, P. J. (2009). Chemical magneto reception in birds: the radical pair mechanism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(2), 353–360.
Salmon, W. C. (1971). Statistical explanation and statistical relevance. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C. N., & Scheines, R. (2000). Causation, prediction, and search. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Strevens, M. (2008). Depth; an account of scientific explanation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Suárez, M. (2007). Causal inference in quantum mechanics: A reassessment. In F. Russo & J. Williams (Eds.), Causality and probability in the science (pp. 65–106). London: London College.
Suárez, M. (2013). ‘Interventions and causality in quantum mechanics’ Erkenntnis, 1–15.
Tiersch, M., & Briegel, H. J. (2012). ‘Decoherence in the chemical compass: the role of decoherence for avian magneto reception’, philosophical transactions of the royal society A: mathematical. Physical and Engineering Sciences, 370(1975), 4517–4540.
Van Fraassen, B. C. (1982). The Charybdis of realism: epistemological implications of Bell’s inequality. Synthese, 52(1), 25–38.
Wood, C.J., & Spekkens, R.W. (2012). ‘The lesson of causal discovery algorithms for quantum correlations: Causal explanations of Bell-inequality violations require fine-tuning’, arXiv preprint arXiv:1208.4119.
Woodward, J. (2005). Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Woodward, J. (2007). ‘Causation with a human face’. In H. Price & R. Corry (Eds.), Causation, physics, and the constitution of reality: Russell’s republic revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Woodward, J. (2008). ‘Mental causation and neural mechanisms’. In J. Hohwy & K. Jesper (Eds.), Being reduced: New essays on reduction, explanation, and causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Acknowledgments
I am very grateful to Phil Dowe for his helpful comments, proof reading of the manuscript (in its various forms) and for many informative discussions regarding causation. I am also very grateful to Gerard Milburn for clear discussions regarding the concept of quantum coherence, additional proof reading of the manuscript and for many informative discussions regarding the newest developments in quantum technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shrapnel, S. Quantum causal explanation: or, why birds fly south. Euro Jnl Phil Sci 4, 409–423 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-014-0094-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-014-0094-5