Abstract
This paper challenges the notion that there is a complete continuity between the thought of Nāgārjuna and the thought of Candrakīrti. It is shown that there is strong reason to doubt Candrakīrti’s gloss of Mūla-madhyamaka-kārikā (MMK) 2.1, and that Candrakīrti’s peculiar reading of this verse causes him to alter the context of the discussion in the four cases in which Nāgārjuna quotes MMK 2.1 later in the text—MMK 3.3, 7.14, 10.13 and 16.7. The innovation produced by Candrakīrti is next contrasted to Nāgārjuna’s style of argument, and it is shown that these two author’s notions of emptiness, as well as their particular implementation of Madhyamaka logic, significantly diverge from each other. Finally, Candrakīrti’s reading of these verses is compared with his commentary on MMK 15 so as to suggest a possible subtle metaphysical position that is at the base of his thinking.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- D:
-
Der-ge Tenjur
- dJ:
-
de Jong (1980a, b)
- JIABS:
-
Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies
- JIP:
-
Journal of Indian Philosophy
- LVP:
-
de La Valée Poussin (1903–1913)
- MMK:
-
Mūla-madhayamaka-kārikā
- PEW:
-
Philosophy East & West
- PP:
-
Prasanna-padā
- VV:
-
Vigraha-vyāvartanī
References
Akutobhayā. Mūlamadhyamakavṛttyakutobhayā (Dbu ma rtsa ba′i′grel pa ga las′jigs med). Tôh. no. 3829. Derge Tanjur, Vol. TSA, folios 29v.1–99r.7.
Āryadeva. Catuḥśtakaśāstrakārikā (Bstan bcos bzhi brgya pa zhes bya ba′i tshig le′ur byas pa).
Ames W.L. (1982) The notion of svabhāva in the thought of Candrakīrti. JIP 10: 161–177
Ames W.L. (1986) Buddhapālita’s exposition of the Madhyamaka. JIP 14: 313–348
Ames W.L. (1995) Bhāvaviveka’s Prajñāpradīpa, a translation of chapter two: ‘Examination of the traversed, the untraversed, and that which is being traversed’. JIP 23: 295–365
Arnold D. (2001) How to do things with Candrakīrti: A comparative study in anti-skepticism. PEW 51(2): 247–279
Arnold D. (2005) Buddhist, Brahmins, and belief: Epistemology in south Asian philosophy of religion. Columbia University Press, New York
Austin J.L. (1962) How to do things with words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Betty L.S. (1983) Nāgārjuna’s masterpiece—logical, mystical, both, or neither?. PEW 33(2): 123–138
Betty L.S. (1984) Is Nāgārjuna a philosopher? A response to Professor Loy. PEW 34(4): 447–450
Bhattacharya, K. (1980). Nāgārjuna’s arguments against motion: Their grammatical basis. In A corpus of Indian studies: Essays in honour of Professor Gaurinath Sastri. Calcutta: Sanskrit Pustak Bhandar.
Bhattacharya K. (1985) Nāgārjuna’s arguments against motion. JIABS 8: 7–15
Bhāvaviveka. Prajñāpradīpamūlamadhyamakavṛtti (Dbu ma’i rtsa ba’i ‘grel pa shes rab sgron ma). Tôh. No. 3853. Derge Tanjur, Vol. TSHA, folios 45v.4–259v.3.
Bronkhorst, J. (1997). Nāgārjuna’s logic. In P. Kieffer-Pülz & J. Hartman (Eds.), Bauddhavidyāsudhākāraḥ: Studies in honour of Heinz Bechert on the occasion of his 65th birthday. Swistall: Swistall-Odendorf.
Buddhapālita. Mūlamadhyamakavṛtti (Dbu ma rtsa ba’i ‘grel pa buddha pâ li ta). Tôh. No. 3842. Derge Tanjur, Vol. TSA, folios 158v.1–281r.4.
Burton D.F. (1999) Emptiness appraised: A critical study of Nāgārjuna’s philosophy. Great Britain, Curzon
Cabezon J.I. (1990) Review of the emptiness of emptiness. JIABS 13(2): 152–161
Casey, D. F. (1967). Nāgārjuna and Candrakīrti, a study of significant differences, 34–45.
Cardona G. (1974) Pānini’s kārakas: Agency, animation and identity. JIP 2: 231–306
de Jong J.W. (1980) Textcritical notes on the Prasannapadā. Indo-Iranian Journal 20: 25–59
de Jong J.W. (1980) Textcritical notes on the Prasannapadā*. Indo-Iranian Journal 20: 217–252
de La Valée Poussin, L. (1903–1913). Mūlamadhyamakakārikās (Mādhyamikasūtras) de Nāgārjuna avec la Prasannapad Commentaire de Candrakīrti. Biblioteca Buddhica IV.
Dreyfus, G.B.J., McClintock, S.L. (eds) (2003) The Svātantrika-Prāsaṅgika distinction: What difference does a difference make?. Wisdom Publications, Boston
Dunne, J. (1996). Thoughtless Buddha, passionate Buddha. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 525–556.
Galloway B. (1987) Notes on Nāgārjuna and Zeno on motion. JIABS 10: 80–87
Garfield J.L. (1995) The fundamental wisdom of the middle way: Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford
Garfield J.L. (2002) Empty words: Buddhist philosophy and cross-cultural interpretation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Garfield J. (2008) Turning a Madhyamaka trick: Reply to Huntington. JIP 36: 507–527
Hayes R.F. (1994) Nāgārjuna’s appeal. JIP 22: 299–378
Hopkins, J. (tr.). (1976). Analysis of coming and going, the second chapter of Candrakirti’s Clear Words, a commentary on Nāgārjuna’s treatise on the middle way. Dharamsala: Library of Tibetan Works and Archives.
Hopkins, J. (1996 [1983]). Meditation on emptiness. Boston: Wisdom Publications.
Huntington C.W. Jr. (1983) The system of the two truths in the Prasannapadā and the Madhyamakāvatāra: A study in Mādhyamika soteriology. JIP 11: 77–106
Huntington C.W. Jr. (1989) The emptiness of emptiness. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu
Huntington C.W. Jr. (1995) A lost text of early Indian Madhyamaka. Asiatishce Studien 49.4: 694–767
Huntington C.W. Jr. (2003) Was Candrakīrti a Prasaṅgika?. In: Dreyfus G.B.J., McClintock L. (eds) The Svātantrika-Prāsaṅgika distinction: What difference does a difference make?. Wisdom Publications, Boston, pp 67–91
Huntington C.W. Jr. (2007) The nature of the Madhyamaka trick. JIP 35: 103–131
Inada K.K. (1993) Nāgārjuna, a translation of his Mūlamadhyamakakārikā with an introductory essay. Sri Satguru, Delhi
Kalupahana D.J. (1986) Nāgārjuna: The philosophy of the middle way. SUNY, New York
Komito D.R. (1987) Nāgārjuna’s “Seventy Stanzas”: A Buddhist psychology of emptiness. Snow Lion, Ithaca
Lindtner Ch. (1981) Buddhapālita on emptiness [Buddhapālita-mūla-madhyamaka-vṛtti XVIII]. Indo-Iranian Journal 23: 187–217
Lindtner Ch. (1982) Nāgārjuniana: Studies in the writings and philosophy of Nāgārjuna. Motilal banarsidass, Delhi
Lindtner Ch. (1986) Master of wisdom: Writings of the Buddhist master Nāgārjuna. Dharma Press, Oakland
Loizzo, J. J. (2001). Candrakīrti and the moon-flower of Nālandā: Objectivity and self-correction in India’s central therapeutic philosophy of language. PhD Dissertation, Columbia University.
Lopez D.S. (1987) A study of Svātantrika. Snow Lion Publications, Ithaca
Loy D. (1984) How not to criticize Nāgārjuna: A response to L. Stafford Betty. PEW 34(4): 437–445
Loy D. (1999) Language against its own mystifications: Deconstruction in Nāgārjuna and Dōgen. PE &W 49(3): 245–260
Mabbett I.W. (1984) Nāgārjuna and Zeno on motion. PEW 34(4): 401–420
MacDonald, A. (2007). Revisiting the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā: Text-critical proposals and problems. Studies of Indian Buddhism and Philosophy, University of Tokyo. Indo Tetsugaku Bukkyō gaku Kenkyū, 14(3), 25–55.
MacDonald, A. (2008). Recovering the Prasannapadā. Critical Review for Buddhist Studies, 3 (Geumgang Centre for Buddhist Studies, Nonsan, Korea): 9–38.
MacDonald A. (2009) Knowing nothing: Candrakīrti and yogic perception. In: Franco E., Eigner D. (eds) Yogic perception, meditation and altered states of consciousness. Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Vienna
Monier-Williams, M. (2003 [1899]). A Sanskrit-English dictionary: Etymologically and philologically arranged, with special reference to cognate Indo-European languages, an new edition greatly enlarged and improved by E. Leumann; C. Cappeller and other scholars. New Delhi, Madras: Asian Educational Services.
Oetke C. (1991) Remarks on the interpretation of Nāgārjuna’s philosophy. JIP 19: 315–323
Oetke C. (2003) Some remarks on thesis and philosophical positions in early Madhyamaka. JIP 31: 449–478
Oetke, C. (2004). On ‘Nāgārjuna’s logic’. In H. R. Bodewitz & M. Hara (Eds.), Studia Philologica Buddhica, Monograph Series XVII, Gedenkschrift J. W. de Jong. Tokyo: The International Institute of Buddhist Studies of the International College for Advance Buddhist Studies.
Pandeya, R. (Ed.). (1988). The Madhyamakaśāstram of Nāgārjuna, with the commentaries Akutobhayā by Nāgārjuna, Madhyamakavṛtti by Buddhapālita, Prajñāpradīpavṛtti by Bhāvaviveka, Prasannapadāvṛtti by Candrakīrti, critically reconstructed (Vol. 2). Delhi, Varanasi, Patna, Bangalore, Madras: Motilal Banarsidass.
Robinson R.H. (1957) Some logical aspects of Nāgārjuna’s system. PEW 6(4): 291–308
Ruegg D.S. (1981) The literature of the Madhyamaka school of philosophy in India. Wiesbadden, Harrassowitz
Ruegg, D. S. (2000). Three studies in the history of Indian and Tibetan Madhyamka philosophy: Studies in Indian and Tibetan Madhyamaka thought Part 1. Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.
Saito, A. (1984). A study of the Buddhapālita-Mūlamadhyamaka-Vṛtti. PhD Dissertation, Australian National University.
Saito, A. (1995). Problems in translating the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā as cited in its commentaries. In D. Tulku (Ed.), Buddhist translations: Problems and perspectives. Manohar.
Saito, A. (2008). On the meaning and beginning of the Madhyamaka/Mādhyamika school. Paper read at the XVth Conference of IABS at Emory University in Atlanta, June 2008.
Samten G.N., Garfield J.L. (2006) Ocean of reasoning: A great commentary on Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Oxford University Press, New York
Shulman, E. (2007 [2009]). Creative ignorance: Nāgārjuna on the ontological significance of consciousness. JIABS, 30(1–2), 139–173.
Siderits M. (1980) The Madhyamaka critique of epistemology II. JIP 9: 121–160
Siderits, M. (1989). Thinking on empty: Madhyamaka anti-realism and canons of rationality. In Sh. Biderman & B. Scharfstein (Eds.). Rationality in question: On eastern and western views of rationality. Leiden, New York, København, Köln: E. J. Brill.
Siderits M., O’brien J.D. (1976) Zeno and Nāgārjuna on motion. PEW 26(3): 281–299
Sonam, R. (tr.) & Rinchen, G. S. (2008). Āryadeva’s Four hundred stanzas on the middle way: With commentary by Gyel-tsap. Ithaca: Snow Lion.
Sprung, M. (1979). A lucid exposition of the middle way: The essential chapters from the Prasannapadā of Candrakīrti. London and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Streng F.J. (1967) Emptiness: A study in religious meaning. Abingdon Press, Nashville and New York
Streng F.J. (1971) The Buddhist doctrine of the two truths as religious philosophy. JIP 1: 262–271
Tachikawa, M. (1974). A study of Buddhapālita’s Mulamadhyamakavṛtti (1). Nagoyadaigaku Bungakubu Kenkyūronshū, 63, 1–19.
Tauscher H. (2003) Phya pa chos kyi seng ge as a Svātantrika. In: Dreyfus G.B.J., McClintock L. (eds) The Svātantrika-Prāsaṅgika distinction: What difference does a difference make?. Wisdom Publications, Boston, pp 207–255
Tillemans, T. (1990). Materials for the study of āryadeva, Dharmapāla and Candrakīrti (2 Vols.). Wiener Studien zür Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde, 24. Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.
Tillemans T. (1999) Scripture, logic, language. Wisdom Publications, Boston
Tillemans T. (2003) Metaphysics for Mādhyamikas. In: Dreyfus G.B.J., McClintock L. (eds) The Svātantrika-Prāsaṅgika distinction: What difference does a difference make?. Wisdom Publications, Boston, pp 93–123
Vose K.A. (2009) Resurrecting Candrakīrti: Disputes in the Tibetan creation of Prāsaṅgika. Wisdom Publication, Bostom
Westerhoff J. (2008) Nāgārjuna’s arguments on motion revisited. JIP 36: 455–479
Westerhoff J. (2009) Nāgārjuna’s Madhyamaka: A philosophical introduction. Oxford University Press, New York
Williams P. (1991) On the interpretation of Madhyamaka thought. JIP 19: 191–218
Ye Shaoyong (2007a). A re-examination of the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā on the basis of the newly identified Sanskrit manuscripts from Tibet. The Annual report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University for the Academic year 2006, X, 149–170.
Ye Shaoyong (2007b). The Mūlamadhyamakakārikā and Buddhapālita’s commentary (1): Romanized texts based on newly identified Sanskrit manuscripts from Tibet. The Annual report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University for the Academic year 2006, X, 117–147.
Ye Shaoyong (2008). The Mūlamadhyamakakārikā and Buddhapālita’s commentary (2): Romanized texts based on newly identified Sanskrit manuscripts from Tibet. The Annual report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University for the Academic year 2007, XI, 105–151.
Yoshimitsu C. (2003) Tshong kha pa’s reevaluation of Candrakīrti’s criticism of autonomous inference. In: Dreyfus G.B.J., McClintock L. (eds) The Svātantrika-Prāsaṅgika distinction: What difference does a difference make?. Wisdom Publications, Boston, pp 257–288
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shulman, E. The Commitments of a Madhyamaka Trickster: Innovation in Candrakīrti’s Prasanna-padā . J Indian Philos 38, 379–417 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-010-9087-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-010-9087-7