Skip to main content
Log in

The Commitments of a Madhyamaka Trickster: Innovation in Candrakīrti’s Prasanna-padā

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper challenges the notion that there is a complete continuity between the thought of Nāgārjuna and the thought of Candrakīrti. It is shown that there is strong reason to doubt Candrakīrti’s gloss of Mūla-madhyamaka-kārikā (MMK) 2.1, and that Candrakīrti’s peculiar reading of this verse causes him to alter the context of the discussion in the four cases in which Nāgārjuna quotes MMK 2.1 later in the text—MMK 3.3, 7.14, 10.13 and 16.7. The innovation produced by Candrakīrti is next contrasted to Nāgārjuna’s style of argument, and it is shown that these two author’s notions of emptiness, as well as their particular implementation of Madhyamaka logic, significantly diverge from each other. Finally, Candrakīrti’s reading of these verses is compared with his commentary on MMK 15 so as to suggest a possible subtle metaphysical position that is at the base of his thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

D:

Der-ge Tenjur

dJ:

de Jong (1980a, b)

JIABS:

Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies

JIP:

Journal of Indian Philosophy

LVP:

de La Valée Poussin (1903–1913)

MMK:

Mūla-madhayamaka-kārikā

PEW:

Philosophy East & West

PP:

Prasanna-padā

VV:

Vigraha-vyāvartanī

References

  • Akutobhayā. Mūlamadhyamakavṛttyakutobhayā (Dbu ma rtsa baigrel pa ga lasjigs med). Tôh. no. 3829. Derge Tanjur, Vol. TSA, folios 29v.1–99r.7.

  • Āryadeva. Catuḥśtakaśāstrakārikā (Bstan bcos bzhi brgya pa zhes bya bai tshig leur byas pa).

  • Ames W.L. (1982) The notion of svabhāva in the thought of Candrakīrti. JIP 10: 161–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames W.L. (1986) Buddhapālita’s exposition of the Madhyamaka. JIP 14: 313–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames W.L. (1995) Bhāvaviveka’s Prajñāpradīpa, a translation of chapter two: ‘Examination of the traversed, the untraversed, and that which is being traversed’. JIP 23: 295–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold D. (2001) How to do things with Candrakīrti: A comparative study in anti-skepticism. PEW 51(2): 247–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold D. (2005) Buddhist, Brahmins, and belief: Epistemology in south Asian philosophy of religion. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin J.L. (1962) How to do things with words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Betty L.S. (1983) Nāgārjuna’s masterpiece—logical, mystical, both, or neither?. PEW 33(2): 123–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Betty L.S. (1984) Is Nāgārjuna a philosopher? A response to Professor Loy. PEW 34(4): 447–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, K. (1980). Nāgārjuna’s arguments against motion: Their grammatical basis. In A corpus of Indian studies: Essays in honour of Professor Gaurinath Sastri. Calcutta: Sanskrit Pustak Bhandar.

  • Bhattacharya K. (1985) Nāgārjuna’s arguments against motion. JIABS 8: 7–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhāvaviveka. Prajñāpradīpamūlamadhyamakavṛtti (Dbu ma’i rtsa ba’i ‘grel pa shes rab sgron ma). Tôh. No. 3853. Derge Tanjur, Vol. TSHA, folios 45v.4–259v.3.

  • Bronkhorst, J. (1997). Nāgārjuna’s logic. In P. Kieffer-Pülz & J. Hartman (Eds.), Bauddhavidyāsudhākāraḥ: Studies in honour of Heinz Bechert on the occasion of his 65th birthday. Swistall: Swistall-Odendorf.

  • Buddhapālita. Mūlamadhyamakavṛtti (Dbu ma rtsa ba’i ‘grel pa buddha pâ li ta). Tôh. No. 3842. Derge Tanjur, Vol. TSA, folios 158v.1–281r.4.

  • Burton D.F. (1999) Emptiness appraised: A critical study of Nāgārjuna’s philosophy. Great Britain, Curzon

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabezon J.I. (1990) Review of the emptiness of emptiness. JIABS 13(2): 152–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, D. F. (1967). Nāgārjuna and Candrakīrti, a study of significant differences, 34–45.

  • Cardona G. (1974) Pānini’s kārakas: Agency, animation and identity. JIP 2: 231–306

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong J.W. (1980) Textcritical notes on the Prasannapadā. Indo-Iranian Journal 20: 25–59

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong J.W. (1980) Textcritical notes on the Prasannapadā*. Indo-Iranian Journal 20: 217–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de La Valée Poussin, L. (1903–1913). Mūlamadhyamakakārikās (Mādhyamikasūtras) de Nāgārjuna avec la Prasannapad Commentaire de Candrakīrti. Biblioteca Buddhica IV.

  • Dreyfus, G.B.J., McClintock, S.L. (eds) (2003) The Svātantrika-Prāsaṅgika distinction: What difference does a difference make?. Wisdom Publications, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, J. (1996). Thoughtless Buddha, passionate Buddha. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 525–556.

  • Galloway B. (1987) Notes on Nāgārjuna and Zeno on motion. JIABS 10: 80–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield J.L. (1995) The fundamental wisdom of the middle way: Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield J.L. (2002) Empty words: Buddhist philosophy and cross-cultural interpretation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield J. (2008) Turning a Madhyamaka trick: Reply to Huntington. JIP 36: 507–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes R.F. (1994) Nāgārjuna’s appeal. JIP 22: 299–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. (tr.). (1976). Analysis of coming and going, the second chapter of Candrakirti’s Clear Words, a commentary on Nāgārjuna’s treatise on the middle way. Dharamsala: Library of Tibetan Works and Archives.

  • Hopkins, J. (1996 [1983]). Meditation on emptiness. Boston: Wisdom Publications.

  • Huntington C.W. Jr. (1983) The system of the two truths in the Prasannapadā and the Madhyamakāvatāra: A study in Mādhyamika soteriology. JIP 11: 77–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington C.W. Jr. (1989) The emptiness of emptiness. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington C.W. Jr. (1995) A lost text of early Indian Madhyamaka. Asiatishce Studien 49.4: 694–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington C.W. Jr. (2003) Was Candrakīrti a Prasaṅgika?. In: Dreyfus G.B.J., McClintock L. (eds) The Svātantrika-Prāsaṅgika distinction: What difference does a difference make?. Wisdom Publications, Boston, pp 67–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington C.W. Jr. (2007) The nature of the Madhyamaka trick. JIP 35: 103–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Inada K.K. (1993) Nāgārjuna, a translation of his Mūlamadhyamakakārikā with an introductory essay. Sri Satguru, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalupahana D.J. (1986) Nāgārjuna: The philosophy of the middle way. SUNY, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Komito D.R. (1987) Nāgārjuna’s “Seventy Stanzas”: A Buddhist psychology of emptiness. Snow Lion, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindtner Ch. (1981) Buddhapālita on emptiness [Buddhapālita-mūla-madhyamaka-vṛtti XVIII]. Indo-Iranian Journal 23: 187–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindtner Ch. (1982) Nāgārjuniana: Studies in the writings and philosophy of Nāgārjuna. Motilal banarsidass, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindtner Ch. (1986) Master of wisdom: Writings of the Buddhist master Nāgārjuna. Dharma Press, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Loizzo, J. J. (2001). Candrakīrti and the moon-flower of Nālandā: Objectivity and self-correction in India’s central therapeutic philosophy of language. PhD Dissertation, Columbia University.

  • Lopez D.S. (1987) A study of Svātantrika. Snow Lion Publications, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Loy D. (1984) How not to criticize Nāgārjuna: A response to L. Stafford Betty. PEW 34(4): 437–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Loy D. (1999) Language against its own mystifications: Deconstruction in Nāgārjuna and Dōgen. PE &W 49(3): 245–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabbett I.W. (1984) Nāgārjuna and Zeno on motion. PEW 34(4): 401–420

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, A. (2007). Revisiting the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā: Text-critical proposals and problems. Studies of Indian Buddhism and Philosophy, University of Tokyo. Indo Tetsugaku Bukkyō gaku Kenkyū, 14(3), 25–55.

  • MacDonald, A. (2008). Recovering the Prasannapadā. Critical Review for Buddhist Studies, 3 (Geumgang Centre for Buddhist Studies, Nonsan, Korea): 9–38.

  • MacDonald A. (2009) Knowing nothing: Candrakīrti and yogic perception. In: Franco E., Eigner D. (eds) Yogic perception, meditation and altered states of consciousness. Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Monier-Williams, M. (2003 [1899]). A Sanskrit-English dictionary: Etymologically and philologically arranged, with special reference to cognate Indo-European languages, an new edition greatly enlarged and improved by E. Leumann; C. Cappeller and other scholars. New Delhi, Madras: Asian Educational Services.

  • Oetke C. (1991) Remarks on the interpretation of Nāgārjuna’s philosophy. JIP 19: 315–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Oetke C. (2003) Some remarks on thesis and philosophical positions in early Madhyamaka. JIP 31: 449–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Oetke, C. (2004). On ‘Nāgārjuna’s logic’. In H. R. Bodewitz & M. Hara (Eds.), Studia Philologica Buddhica, Monograph Series XVII, Gedenkschrift J. W. de Jong. Tokyo: The International Institute of Buddhist Studies of the International College for Advance Buddhist Studies.

  • Pandeya, R. (Ed.). (1988). The Madhyamakaśāstram of Nāgārjuna, with the commentaries Akutobhayā by Nāgārjuna, Madhyamakavṛtti by Buddhapālita, Prajñāpradīpavṛtti by Bhāvaviveka, Prasannapadāvṛtti by Candrakīrti, critically reconstructed (Vol. 2). Delhi, Varanasi, Patna, Bangalore, Madras: Motilal Banarsidass.

  • Robinson R.H. (1957) Some logical aspects of Nāgārjuna’s system. PEW 6(4): 291–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruegg D.S. (1981) The literature of the Madhyamaka school of philosophy in India. Wiesbadden, Harrassowitz

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruegg, D. S. (2000). Three studies in the history of Indian and Tibetan Madhyamka philosophy: Studies in Indian and Tibetan Madhyamaka thought Part 1. Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.

  • Saito, A. (1984). A study of the Buddhapālita-Mūlamadhyamaka-Vṛtti. PhD Dissertation, Australian National University.

  • Saito, A. (1995). Problems in translating the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā as cited in its commentaries. In D. Tulku (Ed.), Buddhist translations: Problems and perspectives. Manohar.

  • Saito, A. (2008). On the meaning and beginning of the Madhyamaka/Mādhyamika school. Paper read at the XVth Conference of IABS at Emory University in Atlanta, June 2008.

  • Samten G.N., Garfield J.L. (2006) Ocean of reasoning: A great commentary on Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, E. (2007 [2009]). Creative ignorance: Nāgārjuna on the ontological significance of consciousness. JIABS, 30(1–2), 139–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siderits M. (1980) The Madhyamaka critique of epistemology II. JIP 9: 121–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Siderits, M. (1989). Thinking on empty: Madhyamaka anti-realism and canons of rationality. In Sh. Biderman & B. Scharfstein (Eds.). Rationality in question: On eastern and western views of rationality. Leiden, New York, København, Köln: E. J. Brill.

  • Siderits M., O’brien J.D. (1976) Zeno and Nāgārjuna on motion. PEW 26(3): 281–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonam, R. (tr.) & Rinchen, G. S. (2008). Āryadeva’s Four hundred stanzas on the middle way: With commentary by Gyel-tsap. Ithaca: Snow Lion.

  • Sprung, M. (1979). A lucid exposition of the middle way: The essential chapters from the Prasannapadā of Candrakīrti. London and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

  • Streng F.J. (1967) Emptiness: A study in religious meaning. Abingdon Press, Nashville and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Streng F.J. (1971) The Buddhist doctrine of the two truths as religious philosophy. JIP 1: 262–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Tachikawa, M. (1974). A study of Buddhapālita’s Mulamadhyamakavṛtti (1). Nagoyadaigaku Bungakubu Kenkyūronshū, 63, 1–19.

  • Tauscher H. (2003) Phya pa chos kyi seng ge as a Svātantrika. In: Dreyfus G.B.J., McClintock L. (eds) The Svātantrika-Prāsaṅgika distinction: What difference does a difference make?. Wisdom Publications, Boston, pp 207–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillemans, T. (1990). Materials for the study of āryadeva, Dharmapāla and Candrakīrti (2 Vols.). Wiener Studien zür Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde, 24. Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.

  • Tillemans T. (1999) Scripture, logic, language. Wisdom Publications, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillemans T. (2003) Metaphysics for Mādhyamikas. In: Dreyfus G.B.J., McClintock L. (eds) The Svātantrika-Prāsaṅgika distinction: What difference does a difference make?. Wisdom Publications, Boston, pp 93–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Vose K.A. (2009) Resurrecting Candrakīrti: Disputes in the Tibetan creation of Prāsaṅgika. Wisdom Publication, Bostom

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerhoff J. (2008) Nāgārjuna’s arguments on motion revisited. JIP 36: 455–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerhoff J. (2009) Nāgārjuna’s Madhyamaka: A philosophical introduction. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P. (1991) On the interpretation of Madhyamaka thought. JIP 19: 191–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye Shaoyong (2007a). A re-examination of the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā on the basis of the newly identified Sanskrit manuscripts from Tibet. The Annual report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University for the Academic year 2006, X, 149–170.

  • Ye Shaoyong (2007b). The Mūlamadhyamakakārikā and Buddhapālita’s commentary (1): Romanized texts based on newly identified Sanskrit manuscripts from Tibet. The Annual report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University for the Academic year 2006, X, 117–147.

  • Ye Shaoyong (2008). The Mūlamadhyamakakārikā and Buddhapālita’s commentary (2): Romanized texts based on newly identified Sanskrit manuscripts from Tibet. The Annual report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University for the Academic year 2007, XI, 105–151.

  • Yoshimitsu C. (2003) Tshong kha pa’s reevaluation of Candrakīrti’s criticism of autonomous inference. In: Dreyfus G.B.J., McClintock L. (eds) The Svātantrika-Prāsaṅgika distinction: What difference does a difference make?. Wisdom Publications, Boston, pp 257–288

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eviatar Shulman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shulman, E. The Commitments of a Madhyamaka Trickster: Innovation in Candrakīrti’s Prasanna-padā . J Indian Philos 38, 379–417 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-010-9087-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-010-9087-7

Keywords

Navigation