Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton October 15, 2019

Ejecting protestors, interpellating supporters: The interactional pragmatics of expulsion at Trump’s campaign rallies

  • Jack Sidnell EMAIL logo
From the journal Semiotica

Abstract

During his campaign for president in 2016, Donald Trump repeatedly instructed his supporters and event security to remove protesters from his rallies, most often, by issuing a directive to “get them out”. These occasions, far from being a distraction from the political process, emerged as potent rituals of participation and the activity of removing protestors became a tool of interactional messaging. Specifically, activities of ejecting protestors were semiotically and discursively elaborated so as to cast them as the virtual realizations of a larger political project of “making America great again.” Various aspects of this include the way these events came to signify about Trump’s persona and the brand of leadership he promised, about immigration reform and border control, about the possibilities for political participation and about a more diffuse struggle against the supposed tyranny of political correctness. Moreover, supporters who responded to the the instruction by attempting to remove protestors were interpellated by it as agents in the local scene of action and were thereby written into the larger populist narrative that Trump articulated.

Acknowledgement

For help with data collection for this paper I thank Melody Devries. For comments on various early written and presented versions I would like to thank Firat Bozcali, Michael Lambek, Michael Lempert, Hy van Luong, Janet MacIntosh, Norma Mendoza-Denton, Chip Zuckerman as well as Marcel Danesi and two anonymous reviewers for the journal. I am alone responsible for any remaining insufficiencies.

References

Althusser, Louis. 1971. Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (Notes towards an investigation). In Ben Brewster (ed.), Lenin and philosophy and other essays, 127–186. New York and London: Monthly Review Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ansell, Aaron. 2017. Democracy is a blessing: Phatic ritual and the public sphere in Northeast Brazil. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 27(1). 22–39.10.1111/jola.12148Search in Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. Forms of time and of the chronotope in the novel: Notes toward a historical poetics. In Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist (ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays, 84–258. Austin: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Baugh, John. 1978. The politics of black power handshakes. Natural History 87. 32–36.Search in Google Scholar

Brubaker, Rogers. 2017. Why populism? Theory and Society 46(5). 357–385.10.1007/s11186-017-9301-7Search in Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. 1997. Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Carr, Summerson. 2009. Anticipating and inhabiting institutional identities. American Ethnologist 36(2). 317–336.10.1111/j.1548-1425.2009.01137.xSearch in Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. 2013. Relationship thinking: Agency, enchrony, and human sociality. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199338733.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles. 1973. May we come in? Semiotica 9(2). 97–116.Search in Google Scholar

Gal, Susan. 2005. Language ideologies compared: Metaphors of public/private. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1). 23–37.10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.23Search in Google Scholar

Hall, Kira, Donna Goldstein & Matthew Ingram. 2016. The hands of Donald Trump: Entertainment, gesture, spectacle. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6(2). 71–100.10.14318/hau6.2.009Search in Google Scholar

Hanks, William. 1990. Referential practice: Language and lived space among the Maya. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hill, Jane. 2000. Read my article: Ideological complexity and the overdetermination of promising in American presidential politics. In Paul Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 259–291. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hillewaert, Sarah. 2016. Tactics and tactility: A sensory semiotics of handshakes in coastal Kenya. American Anthropologist 118(1). 49–66.10.1111/aman.12517Search in Google Scholar

Hodges, Adam. 2014. ‘Yes, we can’: The social life of a political slogan. In Christopher Hart & Piotr Cap (eds.), Contemporary critical discourse studies, 349–366. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith & Susan Gal. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Paul V. Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 35–84. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lempert, Michael & Michael Silverstein. 2012. Creatures of politics: Media, message, and the American presidency. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1998 [1903]. Sundry logical conceptions. In Peirce Edition Project (ed.), Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2, 1893–1913.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23. 193–229.10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 2017. Message, myopia, dystopia. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 7(1). 407–413.10.14318/hau7.1.027Search in Google Scholar

Stasch, Rupert. 2011. Ritual and oratory revisited: The semiotics of effective action. Annual Review of Anthropology 40. 159–174.10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145623Search in Google Scholar

Urban, Greg. 2006. Metasemiosis and metapragmatics. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, vol. 8, 88–91. Oxford: Pergamon Press.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/03036-4Search in Google Scholar

Zuckerman, Charles. 2016. Phatic violence? Gambling and the arts of distraction in Laos. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 26(3). 294–314.10.1111/jola.12137Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-10-15
Published in Print: 2019-11-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 18.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2019-0067/html
Scroll to top button