Abstract
Critical thinking is currently much celebrated in the contemporary West and beyond, not least in higher education. Tertiary education students are generally expected to adopt a critical attitude in order to become responsible and constructive participants in the development of modern democratic society. Currently, the perceived desirability of critical thinking has even made it into a seemingly successful marketable commodity. A brief online search yields a vast number of books that are mostly presented as self-help manuals to enable readers to enhance their critical abilities. But how should critical thinking be taught? Is it at all possible? Instead of attempting to provide a direct answer to this pressing question, this paper seeks inspiration in a culturally rather remote philosophy of education that hitherto has not been regarded as a stimulant for critical thinking, namely the ancient philosophy of Confucianism. The paper argues that not only are most if not all types of thinking regarded in the West as ‘critical’ also present in Confucianism, but also that the Confucian philosophy presides over a particular type which increasingly tends to be neglected in the contemporary West; a type that I call ‘transformative self-critical attitude’. Through a comparison with the well-known Teaching Perspectives Inventory in higher education, the transformative self-critical attitude is used to elucidate some further aspects of the Confucian philosophy of education that may offer valuable insights to contemporary educators.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Unless otherwise indicated, translations of non-English sources are my own.
References
Altbach, Philip G., Liz Reisberg, and Laura E. Rumbley. 2009. Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. A report prepared for the UNESCO 2009 world conference on higher education. Paris: UNESCO.
Ames, Roger T. 2011. Confucian role ethics. A vocabulary. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
Analects (Lunyu 論語). 1966. A concordance to the analects of Confucius. Harvard-Yenching Institute Sinological Index Series. Supplement no. 16. Taipei: Chinese Materials and Research Aids Service Center, Inc.
Barnett, Roland. 1997. Higher education: A critical business. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Brookfield, Stephen D. 2012. Teaching for critical thinking. Tools and techniques to help students question their assumptions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Brummelman, Eddie, Sander Thomaes, Stefanie A. Nelemans, Bram Orobio de Castro, Geertjan Overbeek, and Brad J. Bushman. 2015. Origins of narcissism in children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112(12): 3659–3662.
Dewey, John. 1934. Art as experience. New York: Perigee Books.
Dewey, John. 1944. Democracy and education. An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: The Free Press.
Ennis, Robert H. 1987. A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice, ed. Joan B. Barton, and Robert J. Sternberg, 9–26. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Fung, Dennis. 2014. The influence of ground rules on Chinese students’ learning of critical thinking in group work: A cultural perspective. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 22(3): 337–368.
Hall, David L., and Roger T. Ames. 1987. Thinking through Confucius. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hansen, Chad. 1976. Review of Confucius: The secular as sacred, by Herbert Fingarette. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 3(2): 197–204.
Kant, Immanuel. 1966. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Stuttgart: Reclam.
Kant, Immanuel. 1974. Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Werkausgabe Band VII. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Lam, Chi Ming. 2014. Confucian rationalism. Educational Philosophy and Theory 46(13): 1450–1461.
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1969. Totality and infinity. An essay on exteriority. Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Liji zhijie 禮記直解 [Book of Rites with annotations]. 2000. Annotated by Ren Pingzhi 任平直. Hangzhou: Zhejiang wenyi chubanshe.
Lipman, Matthew. 2003. Thinking in education, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, Ben. 2010. Brookfield’s four lenses: Becoming a critically reflective teacher. The University of Sydney, Arts Teaching & Learning Network. http://sydney.edu.au/arts/teaching_learning/academic_support/Brookfield_summary.pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2015.
Paul, Richard, and Linda Elder. 2001. Critical thinking. Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Paul, Richard, and Linda Elder. 2006. The miniature guide to critical thinking: Concepts and tools. Tomales, CA: The Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Plato. 1997. Apology. Trans. G.M.A. Grube. In Complete works, ed. John M. Cooper, 17–36. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett.
Pratt, Daniel D. 2002. Good teaching: One size fits all? New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 93: 5–16.
Ryan, Janette, and Kam Louie. 2007. False dichotomy? ‘Western’ and ‘Confucian’ concepts of scholarship and learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory 39: 404–417.
Sigurðsson, Geir. 2010. Towards a creative China: Education in China. In The Irish Asia strategy and its China relations, ed. Fan Hong, and Jörn-Carsten Gottwald, 61–77. Amsterdam: Rozenberg.
Sigurðsson, Geir. 2014. Ethics and ego: East–west perceptions of morality. Nordicum-Mediterraneum. Icelandic E-Journal of Nordic and Mediterranean Studies 9: 2. http://nome.unak.is/nm-marzo-2012/vol-9-no-2-2014/64-conference-paper/418-ethics-and-ego-east-west-perceptions-of-morality#_edn20. Accessed 26 Aug 2015.
Sigurðsson, Geir. 2015. Confucian propriety and ritual learning. A philosophical interpretation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Tan, Sor-Hoon. 2003. Confucian democracy. A Deweyan reconstruction. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Taylor, Rodney L. 1998. The religious character of the Confucian tradition. Philosophy East and West 48(1): 80–107.
TPI Teaching Perspectives Inventory. 2001–2014. http://www.teachingperspectives.com/tpi/. Accessed 25 Aug 2015.
Vaihinger, Hans. 1935. The philosophy of ‘As if’. A system of the theoretical, practical and religious functions of mankind. Trans. C.K. Ogden. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. Ltd.
Xunzi. A translation and study of the complete works. 1988–1994. 3 Vols. Trans. John Knoblock. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Zehetner, Anthony A. 2015. Excessive parental praise breeds narcissism. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 51(7): 742.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sigurðsson, G. Transformative Critique: What Confucianism Can Contribute to Contemporary Education. Stud Philos Educ 36, 131–146 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-015-9502-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-015-9502-3