Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T10:04:05.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rorty's Mark of the Mental and His Disappearance Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

R. I. Sikora
R. I. Sikora*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In “Incorrigibility as the Mark of the Mental,” Richard Rorty argues that although there is no characteristic that marks off everything that is mental, the contents of the stream of consciousness (thoughts and sensations) may be considered as that which is paradigmatically mental, and they are distinguished by the fact that sincere first-person reports about them are currently treated as incorrigible. (From now on, “incorrigible” will stand for “treated as incorrigible.“) He adds that “beliefs, desires, moods, emotions, intentions, etc.“ (p. 491) are also taken to be mental because reports about them are almost incorrigible.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , September 1974 , pp. 191 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The journal of Philosophy (June 25, 1970). Unless otherwise noted, all quotations will be from this article.

2 Rorty has acknowledged in a letter to me that I have given an accurate account of his argument for the disappearance thesis. He says, “the argument you sketch is indeed the only argument which I have to offer.“