Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethical Rule Breaking by Employees: A Test of Social Bonding Theory

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As employees continue to lie, cheat, and steal from their employers, researchers have tried to help managers understand and possibly predict such deviant behavior. This study considers the specific employee misconduct of ethical rule breaking. Hirschi (1969) suggested that deviant behavior can be better understood by social bonding theory. The social bonding model includes four elements; attachment, commitment, involvement, and belief. It is proposed that Hirschi's social bonding theory can be used to understand ethical rule breaking by employees. Using a sample of 200 employees, the results indicate that the social bonding elements of attachment and involvement can be used to better understand the reported likelihood of ethical rule breaking of employees. Recommendations for better applying the social bonding model to ethical rule breaking are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albanese, J. S.: 1984, ‘Corporate Criminology: Explaining Deviance of Business and Political Organizations’, Journal of Criminal Justice 12(1), 11-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. D., S. J. Hepworth, T. D. Wall and P. B. Warr: 1981, The Experience of Work: A Compendium and Review of 249 Measures and their Use(Academic Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. R. and R. Hirschi: 1990, A General Theory of Crime(Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T.: 1969, Causes of Delinquency(University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, R. C.: 1986, ‘Acts Against the Workplace: Social Bonding and Employee Deviance’, Deviant Behavior 7(1), 53-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, R. C. and J. Clark: 1982, ‘Formal and Informal Social Controls of Employee Deviance’, The Sociological Quarterly 23, 333-343.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, T. L.: August 1999, Thick as Thieves: A Social Embeddedness Model of Rule Breaking in Organizations. Paper presented at the National Academy of Management Meeting, Social Issues Division, Chicago, IL.

  • McGee, G. W. and R. C. Ford: 1987, ‘Two (or More?) Dimensions of Organizational Commitment: Reexamination of the Affective and Continuance Commitment Scales’, Journal of Applied Psychology 72, 638-642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., S. V. Paunonen, I. R. Gellatly, R. D. Goffin and D. Jackson: 1989, ‘Organizational Commitment and Job Performance: It's the Nature of Commitment that Counts’, Journal of Applied Psychology 74, 152-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raelin, J. A.: 1986, ‘An Analysis of Professional Deviance Within Organizations’, Human Relations 39(12), 1103-1129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raelin, J. A.: 1994, ‘Three Scales of Professional Deviance Within Organizations’, Journal of Organizational Behavior 15(6), 483-501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L. and R. J. Bennett: 1995, ‘A Typology of Deviant Workplace Behaviors: A Multidimensional Scaling Study’, Academy of Management Journal 38(2), 555-572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L. and J. Greenberg: 1998, ‘Employees Behaving Badly: Dimensions, Determinants and Dilemmas in the Study of Workplace Deviance’, Trends in Organizational Behavior 5, 1-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seashore, S. E., E. E. Lawler, P. Mirvis and C. Cammann (eds.): 1982, Observing and Measuring Organizational Change: A Guide to Field Practice(Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, L. M., L. A. Newton and G. C. Thornton: 1990, ‘Job and Organizational Attitudes in Relation to Employee Behavioral Intentions’, Journal of Organizational Behavior 11, 57-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. L.: 1999, ‘The Development of Six Ethical Business Dilemmas’, The Leadership & Organization Development Journal 20(4), 189-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szwajkowski, E.: 1989, ‘Lessons for the Consultant from Research on Employee Misconduct’, Consultation: An International Journal 8(3), 181-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, D. J., R. V. Dawis, G. W. England and L. H. Lofquist: 1967, Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire(Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nova Southeastern University, 3301 College Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 33314, U.S.A.

    Randi L. Sims

Authors
  1. Randi L. Sims
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sims, R.L. Ethical Rule Breaking by Employees: A Test of Social Bonding Theory. Journal of Business Ethics 40, 101–109 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020330801847

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020330801847

Search

Navigation