Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Consideration of Moral Intensity in Ethicality Judgements: Its Relationship with Whistle-blowing and Need-for-Cognition

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within the theoretical framework of the moral intensity model of ethical decision making (Jones, 1991), two studies ascertained the contention that ethicality judgements are contingent upon the perceived intensity of the moral issue. In addition, Study 1 extended the validity of the moral intensity notion to whistle-blowing behaviour; Study 2 addressed the effect of the individual difference variable, need-for-cognition, on differential utilization of intensity dimensions in the ethical decision process. A scenario approach was used in both studies. Results have provided convergent support for the issue-contingency nature of ethical decisions. Study 1 also showed that felt empathy for potential victims predicted the likelihood of whistle-blowing behaviour, and that the perceived overall ethicality of a wrongdoing predicted felt empathy when potential victims are psychologically and physically close. Results of Study 2 further suggested a greater utilization of issue-relevant information by high need-for-cognition individuals in ethical decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, R. W. and J. Sweeney: 1994, ‘Industry Type, Culture, Mode of Entry and Perceptions of International Marketing Ethics Problems: A Cross-Cultural Comparison’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 775–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. and J. S. Coke: 1981, ‘Empathy: A Source of Altruistic Motivation for Helping’, in J. P. Rushton and R. M. Sorrentino (eds), Altruism and Helping Behaviour: Social, Personality and Developmental Perspectives(Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), pp. 167–187.

  • Batson, C., B. D. Duncan, T. B. Ackerman, T. Buckley and K. Birch: 1981, ‘Is Empathy a Source of Altruistic Motivation?’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40, 290–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayles, M. D., ed.: 1968, Contemporary Utilitarianism(Doubleday, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, R.: 1959, Ethical Theory(Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brief, A. P. and S. J. Motowidlo: 1986, ‘Prosocial Organizational Behaviours’, Academy of Management Review 11, 710–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T. and R. E. Petty: 1982, ‘The Need for Cognition’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42, 116–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., R. E. Petty and C. F. Kao: 1984, ‘The Efficient Assessment of the Need for Cognition’, Journal of Personality Assessment 48, 306–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., R. E. Petty, C. F. Kao and R. Rodriguez: 1986, ‘Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion: An Individual difference Perspective’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 1032–1043.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., R. E. Petty and K. J. Morris: 1983,’ Effects of Need for Cognition on Message Evaluation, Recall and Persuasion’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45, 805–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. R., E. Stotland and D. M. Wolfe: 1995, ‘An Experimental Investigation of Need for Cognition’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51, 291–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coke, J. S., C. D. Bastonand and K. McDavis: 1978,’ Empathic Mediation of Helping: A Two-Stage Model’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36, 752–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGeorge, R. T.: 1990, Business Ethics, 3rd Ed. (Macmillan, New York).

  • Dozier, J. B. and M. P. Miceli: 1985, ‘Potential Predictors of Whistle-Blowing: A Prosocial Behaviour Perspective’, Academy of Management Review 10, 823–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J. and B. Loken: 1989, ‘Analyzing Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’, Journal of Business Research 19, 83–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukerich, J. M., M. J. Waller, E. George and G. P. Huber: 1993, ‘Moral Intensity in Group Problem Solving’, Paper presented at the National Academy of Management Meetings, Atlanta, GA.

  • Dunegan, K. J.: 1993, ‘Framing, Cognitive Modes, and Image Theory: Towards an Understanding of a Glass Half Full’, Journal of Applied Psychology 78, 491–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, D. W.: 1983, Do It My Way - Or You're Fired!(Wiley & Sons, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, O. C. and L. G. Gresham: 1985, ‘A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 29, 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H.: 1990, ‘Multiple Processes by which Attitudes Guide Behavior: The Mode Model a an Integrative Framework’, in M. P. Zanna (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology(vol. 23) (Academic Press, San Diego, CA), pp. 75–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R. C. and W. D. Richardson: 1994, ‘Ethical Decision Making: A Review of the Empirical Literature’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 205– 221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzche, D. J.: 1988, ‘An Examination of Marketing Ethics: Role of the Decision Maker, Consequences of the Decision, Management Position and Sex of the Respondent’, Journal of Macromarketing,Fall, 29–39.

  • Glazer, M. P. and P. M. Glazer: 1986, ‘Whistleblowing’, Psychology Today, August, 36–43.

  • Graham, J. W.: 1986, ‘Principled Organizational Dissent: A Theoretical Essay’, in B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behaviour, Vol. 8 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hann, N.: 1983, ‘An Interactional Morality of Everyday Life’, in N. Hann, R. H. Bellah, P. Rabinow and W. M. Sullivan (eds.), Social Science as Moral Inquiry(Columbia University Press, New York), pp. 218–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R.: 1973, ‘Moral Conduct and Moral Character: A Psychological Perspective’, Psychological Bulletin 79, 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein, H. A.: 1978, ‘Promotive Tension and Prosocial Behaviour: A Lewinian Analysis’, in L. Wispe (ed.), Altruism, Sympathy, and Helping: Psychological and Sociological Principles(Academic Press, New York), pp. 177–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.: 1991, ‘Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model’, Academy of Management Review 16, 366– 395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. and V. L. Huber: 1992, ‘Issue Contingency in Ethical Decision Making’, International Association for Business and Society Proceedings, 156–166.

  • Kahn, W. A.: 1990, ‘Toward an Agenda for Business Ethics Research’, Academy of Management Review 15, 311–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I.: 1964, Groupwork of the Metaphysics of Morals(Harper & Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, O. E. M.: 1993, ‘Artificial Decision-Making and Artificial Ethics: A Management Concern’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 313–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H. J.: 1989, ‘An Integrated Control Theory Model of Work Motivation’, Academy of Management Review 14, 150–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knouse, S. B. and R. A. Giacalone: 1992, ‘Ethical Decision-Making in Business: Behavioral Issues and Concerns’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 369–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1973, ‘The Claim to Moral Adequacy of a Highest Stage of Moral Judgement’, Journal of Philosophy 70, 630–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1976, ‘Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach’, in T. Lickona (ed.), Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research and Social Issues(Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, D.: 1975, ‘Empathy and Altruism’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32, 1134–1146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latane, B. and J. M. Darley: 1968, ‘Group Inhibition of Bystander Intervention’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 10, 215–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latane, B. and J. M. Darley: 1970, The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help?(Appleton-Century Cliffs, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessiter, D. G., M. A. Briggs and R. E. Bowman: 1991, ‘Need for Cognition and the Perception of Ongoing Behavior’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17, 156–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessiter, D. G., M. A. Briggs and R. D. Slaw: 1991, ‘Need for Cognition, Causal Processing and Memory for Behavior’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17, 694–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichenstein, T. K. and M. Rothbart: 1985, ‘Associative storage and Retrieval Processes in Person Memory’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 11, 316–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G. and K. J. Maher: 1990, ‘Alternative Information-Processing Models and Their Implications for Theory, Research and Practice’, Academy of Management Review 15, 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, D.: 1965, Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism(Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Macheswaran, D. and S. Chaiken: 1991, ‘Promoting Systematic Processing in Low-Motivation Settings: Effects of Incongruent Information on Processing and Judgement’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61, 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malin, M. H.: 1983, ‘Protecting the Whistle-blower form Retaliatory Discharge’, University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 16, 277–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P. and J. P. Near: 1985, ‘Characteristics of Perceived Wrongdoing and Organizational Climate Associated with Whistle-blowing Decisions’, Personnel Psychology 38, 525–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P. and J. P. Near: 1992, Blowing the Whistle: The Organizational and Legal Implications for Companies and Employees(Lexington Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberg, D. J.: 1989, ‘The Ethics of Impression Management’, in R. A. Giacalone and P. Rosenfeld (eds.), Impression Management in the Organization(Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), pp. 377–396.

  • Morris, S. A. and R. A. McDonald: An Empirical Investigation', Journal of Business Ethics 14, 715– 726.

  • Near, J. P. and T. C. Jensen: 1983, ‘The Whistleblowing Process: Retaliation and Perceived Effectiveness’, Work and Occupations 10, 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P. and M. P. Miceli: 1986, ‘Retaliation Against Whistle-blowers: Predictors and Effects’, Journal of Applied Psychology 71, 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. P. and M. P. Miceli: 1987, ‘Whistle-blowers in Organizations: Dissidents or Reformers?’, in B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behaviour(Vol. 9) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 321–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmerlee, M. A., J. P. Near and T. C. Jensen: 1982, ‘Correlates of Whistle-blowers' Perceptions of Organizational Retaliation’, Administrative Science Quarterly 7, 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E. and J. T. Cacioppo: 1986, Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routs to attitude Change(Springer-Verlag, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., J. T. Cacioppo and J. A. Kasmer: 1985, ‘Individual Differences in Social Loafing on Cognitive Tasks’, Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.

  • Piaget, J.: 1965, The Judgment of the Child(Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralin, J. A.: 1987, ‘The Professional as the Executive's Ethical Aide-de-camp’, Academy of Management Executive 1, 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice(Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossouw, G. J.: 1994, ‘Rational Interaction for Moral Sensitivity: A Postmodern Approach to Moral Decision-making in Business’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scudder, J. N., R. T. Herschel and M. D. Crossland: 1994, ‘Test of a Model Linking Cognition Motivation, Assessment of Alternatives, Decision Quality and Group Process Satisfaction’, Small Group Research 25, 57–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M.: 1995, ‘The Role of Moral Intensity and Fairness Perception in Judgements of Ethicality: A Comparison of Managerial Professionals and the General Public’, Journal of Business Ethics, in press.

  • Singer, M. and A. Singer: 1995, ‘Observer Judgements about Moral Agents' Ethical Decisions: The Role of Scope of Justice and Moral Intensity’, Journal of Business Ethics, in press.

  • Soeken, K. L. and D. R. Soeken: 1987, ‘A Survey of Whistle-blowers: Their Stressors and Coping Strategies’, Proceedings of the Hearing on H.R. 25 (US Government Printing Office, Washington DC), pp. 156–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tevino, L. K.: 1986, ‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-situation Interactionist Model’, Academy of Management Review 11, 601– 617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., C. D. Sutton and R. W. Woodman: 1985, ‘Effects of Reinforcement Contingencies and Cognitive Moral Development on Ethical Decision-making Behavior’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, San Diego.

  • Velasquez, M. G.: 1982, Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases(Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Verplanken, B.: 1993, ‘Need for Cognition and External Information Search: Responses to Time Pressure during Decision Making’, Journal of Research in Personality 27, 238–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verplanken, B., P. T. Hazenherg and G. P. Palenewen: 1992, ‘Need for Cognition and External Information Search’, Journal of Research in Personality 26, 128–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, B. and J. B. Cullen: 1988, ‘The Organizational Bases of Ethical Work Climates’, Administrative Science Quarterly 33, 101–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, B., L. K. Trevino and D. L. Shapiro: 1993, ‘Peer Reporting of Unethical Behavior: The Influence of Justice Evaluations and Social Context Factors’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 253–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, D.: 1979, Bureaucratic Opposition(Pergamon Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westin, A. F., ed.: 1981, Whistle-blowing: Loyalty and Dissent in the Corporation(McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wofford, J. C. and V. L. Goodwin: 1990, ‘Effects of Feedback on Cognitive Processing and Choice of Decision Style’, Journal of Applied Psychology 75, 603–612.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Ming Singer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah Mitchell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Julie Turner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singer, M., Mitchell, S. & Turner, J. Consideration of Moral Intensity in Ethicality Judgements: Its Relationship with Whistle-blowing and Need-for-Cognition. Journal of Business Ethics 17, 527–541 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005765926472

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005765926472

Keywords

Search

Navigation