Skip to main content
Log in

Social Responsibility and the Marketing Educator: A Discussion Document

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports an attempt to develop a code of ethics for marketing educators at colleges and universities throughout the world. The paper describes the process of development and the outcome. The code of ethics details social responsibilities of marketing educators in relation to certain publics and actions. Social responsibilities related to certain publics include ethical prescriptions such as treating others with respect and dignity, upholding justice, providing information to others about matters that may significantly affect their well being, providing access to needed and affordable resources, protecting the privacy of others, allowing the expression of a grievance and providing a mechanism for redress, providing fair credit, and ensuring safety. Social responsibilities related to certain actions include avoiding conflict of interest; conducting ourselves with the highest standards of intellectual honesty, professionalism, and objectivity; adhering to all policies of our academic institutions and challenging unjust or ineffective policies; mentoring our junior colleagues and students; being selfless in contributing to the marketing discipline and society at large, and defending the principles of academic freedom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaah, Ishmael P. and Edward A. Riordan: 1990, ‘The Incidence of Unethical Practices in Marketing Research: An Empirical Investigation’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 18 (Spring), 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association of University Professors: 1987, ‘Statement on Professional Ethics’, Academe (July–August), p. 49.

  • American Marketing Association: 1996, Code of Ethics (American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, Jermey: 1984, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (Hafner Publishing, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, Ted and Barbara Coe: 1976, ‘Marketing Research: The Search for Professionalism’, in Kenneth L. Bernhardt (ed.), Marketing: 1776–1976 and Beyond (The American Marketing Association, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Consumer Advisory Council: 1993, ‘The Consumer Bill of Rights’, Consumer Advisory Council, First Report (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evan, W. M. and R. E. Freeman: 1988, ‘A Stateholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism’, in T. L. Beauchamp and N. E. Bowie (eds.), Ethical Theory and Business, 3rd ed. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), pp. 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C. and Stephen J. Skinner: 1988, ‘Ethical Behavior and Bureaucratic Structure in Marketing Research Organizations’, Journal of Marketing Research 25 (February), 103–109.

  • Kinnear, Thomas C.: 1992, ‘From the Editor’, Journal of Marketing 56 (January), 1–3; ‘From the American Marketing Association: Journal of Marketing Editorial Policy’, Journal of Marketing 56 (January), 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laczniak, Gene R. and Patrick E. Murphy: 1993, Ethical Marketing Decisions: The Higher Road (Allyn and Bacon, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Landon, E. Laird: 1982, ‘Marketing Educators Should Crack Down on Idioplagiarism’, The Marketing News 16 (July 23), 1 & 4.

  • Lincoln, Douglas J. and Gary McCain: 1984, ‘Must Get, Maintain Publishing Ethical Standards’, The Marketing Educator 3 (Winter), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marketing News: 1987, ‘AMA Adopts New Code of Ethics’, Marketing News 21 (September 11), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. Barry, William O. Bearden, Lynne Davis Richardson: 1990, ‘Perceived Conduct and Professional Ethics Among Marketing Faculty’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 18 (Summer), 185–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John Stuart: 1979, Utilitarianism (Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, IN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherrell, Daniel L., Jospeh F. Hair, Jr. and Mitch Griffin: 1989, ‘Marketing Academicians' Perceptions of Ethical Research Behavior’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 17 (Fall), 315–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. Craig and John A. Quelch: 1993, Ethics in Marketing (Irwin, Homewood, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, Valerie, Alladi Venketesh and Mary C. Gilley: 1983, ‘Solve Idioplagiarism Problems by Changing Conference Proceedings Policy’, The Marketing News 17 (August), 3 & 10.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sirgy, M.J. Social Responsibility and the Marketing Educator: A Discussion Document. Journal of Business Ethics 19, 193–206 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005742504867

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005742504867

Keywords

Navigation