Thought as action: Inner speech, self-monitoring, and auditory verbal hallucinations

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2005.12.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Passivity experiences in schizophrenia are thought to be due to a failure in a neurocognitive action self-monitoring system (NASS). Drawing on the assumption that inner speech is a form of action, a recent model of auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs) has proposed that AVHs can be explained by a failure in the NASS. In this article, we offer an alternative application of the NASS to AVHs, with separate mechanisms creating the emotion of self-as-agent and other-as-agent. We defend the assumption that inner speech can be considered as a form of action, and show how a number of previous criticisms of applying the NASS to AVHs can be refuted. This is achieved in part through taking a Vygotskian developmental perspective on inner speech. It is suggested that more research into the nature and development of inner speech is needed to further our understanding of AVHs.

Introduction

The phenomenon of auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs), where individuals report hearing speech in the absence of any external stimulation, continues to puzzle psychiatrists and psychologists. Schneider (1959) classified AVHs as a first-rank symptom of schizophrenia, reflecting the approximately 60–74% of those with schizophrenia who report experiencing them (Slade and Bentall, 1988, Wing et al., 1974). However, a movement has developed away from understanding AVHs as necessarily signifying pathology, and towards an acceptance that voice-hearing can be a part of normal experience (Johns & van Os, 2001). Furthermore, there do not seem to be radical differences in the structure and functions of AVHs between voice-hearers with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and those without (Leudar, Thomas, McNally, & Glinski, 1997). Whether in a clinical or non-clinical sample, one of the fundamental characteristics of AVHs is their alien quality. In this article, we take a new look at the question of how it is possible that a self-generated cognition may come to be experienced as produced and performed by an agent other than the self.

Section snippets

Explaining agency: Is it me?

Frith and colleagues (e.g., Frith, Blakemore, & Wolpert, 2000) have developed an elegant model of the passivity experiences, such as delusions of control, found in schizophrenia. This model attributes such experiences to deficits in a postulated neurocognitive action self-monitoring system (NASS), and has had its predictions supported by empirical research (e.g., Blakemore, Wolpert, & Frith, 1998). The NASS model is based on Miall and Wolpert’s (1995) forward model which was developed to model

The application of the forward model to AVHs

Somewhat surprisingly Frith and colleagues have only applied this version of their forward model to abnormalities involving overt actions such as delusions of control and anarchic hand (e.g., Blakemore and Frith, 2003, Frith, 2002, Frith et al., 2000). Frith and colleagues have not attempted to use it to explain phenomena not involving overt movements, such as AVHs. One reason for this may be criticisms (e.g., Gallagher, 2004, Stephens and Graham, 2000) of Frith’s previous attempt to apply his

Inner speech as a kind of action

One potentially problematic aspect of Seal et al.’s (2004) account is the unexamined assumption that it is possible to transpose Frith et al.’s (2000) model from overt actions to the process of thinking in inner speech. Gallagher (2004) has made a strong case that it is incorrect simply to transpose Frith’s forward model from its successful explanation of passivity experiences, involving overt actions, to cognitive phenomena such as AVHs where there is no overt behavior. Gallagher suggests that

References (43)

  • D.T. Leube et al.

    The neural correlates of perceiving one’s own movements

    Neuroimage

    (2003)
  • K.A. Akins et al.

    Who may I say is calling?

    Behavioral and Brain Sciences

    (1986)
  • R.P. Bentall

    The illusion of reality: A review and integration of psychological research on hallucinations

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1990)
  • R.P. Bentall

    Madness explained

    (2003)
  • L.E. Berk

    Children’s private speech: An overview of theory and the status of research

  • P.A. Bick et al.

    Auditory hallucinations and subvocal speech in schizophrenic patients

    American Journal of Psychiatry

    (1987)
  • S-J. Blakemore et al.

    The cerebellum is involved in predicting the sensory consequences of action

    Neuroreport

    (2001)
  • S-J. Blakemore et al.

    Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation

    Nature Neuroscience

    (1998)
  • A. Clark

    Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again

    (1997)
  • A. Clark

    Magic words: How language augments human cognition

  • A. Clark et al.

    The extended mind (Active externalism)

    Analysis

    (1998)
  • Cited by (130)

    • Ideomotor learning: Time to generalize a longstanding principle

      2022, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text