Abstract
This commentary on K.D. Pimple’s “Six Domains of Research Ethics”, focuses on the area of institutional integrity and looks at “relationships between researchers, their sponsoring institutions, funding agencies, and the government,” considering the implications of institutional demands and support for research, and, in turn, demands and support on research priorities and public education.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pimple, K.D. (2002) Six Domains of Research Ethics: A Heuristic Framework for the Responsible Conduct of Research, Science and Engineering Ethics 8(2): 191–205.
Slaughter, S. and Rhoades, G. (1996) The Emergence of a Competitiveness Research and Development Policy Coalition and the Commercialization of Academic Science and Technology, Science, Technology and Human Value 21, 3 Summer: 303–339.
Slaughter, S. and Leslie, L. (1997). Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University, Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore, MD, USA.
National Science Foundation (2000) Science and engineering indicators 2000, Vol. 1. http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/stats.htm. Chapter 6.
Volk, C., Slaughter, S. and Thomas. S.L. (2001) Models of institutional resource allocation: Mission, market and gender. The Journal of Higher Education, 72, 4 July/August: 387–413.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Slaughter, S. Commentary on “six domains of research ethics”. SCI ENG ETHICS 8, 219–222 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0022-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0022-5