Abstract
The paper discusses issues related to the use of faceted classifications in an online environment. The author argues that knowledge organization systems can be fully utilized in information retrieval only if they are exposed and made available for machine processing. The experience with classification automation to date may be used to speed up and ease the conversion of existing faceted schemes or the creation of management tools for new systems. The author suggests that it is possible to agree on a set of functional requirements for supporting faceted classifications online that are equally relevant for the maintenance of classifications, the creation of classification indexing tools, or the management of classifications in an authority file. It is suggested that a set of requirements for analytico-synthetic classifications may be put forward to improve standards for the use and exchange of knowledge organization systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Parallel division rule by which the same subdivsion can be used in several places in the schedules. (e.g. animals in zoology, palaeontology, agriculture; languages in ethnic grouping, literature and linguistics). So, for instance, UDC notation 821.111 English literature or (=111) English speaking people is derived from a notation =111 English language.
Definition of a telescoped array: “Array of classes in a schedule of classification, made of co-ordinate and subordinate isolates, as viewed from the Idea Plane, but whose class numbers appear to be co-ordinate, as viewed from Notation Plane” (Ranganathan 1962, p. 278).
We can mention here a simple format with XML encoding created to express resource description terms organized in mutually exclusive categories (facets) under the title XFML (eXchangeable Faceted Metadata Language)—which does not have the status of a vocabulary standard but is frequently used to support applications for facet-based Web interfaces (Van Dijk 2003). This schema also seems to be focused on hierarchical relationships and has no provision for accommodating complex vocabularies.
References
Allen RB (1995) Retrieval from facet spaces. Electronic Publishing 8(2/3):247–258
Barnhart L (1996) Access control records: prospects and challenges. Authority Control in the 21st Century: an invitational conference, Dublin, OH, March 31–April 1, 1996 http://www.digitalarchive.oclc.org/da/ViewObject.jsp?objid=0000003520&reqid=354. Cited 30 June 2005
Broughton V (1999) Notational expressivity; the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding. Knowl Organ 26(3):140–148
Broughton V, Lane H (2000) Classification schemes revisited: application to web indexing and searching. In: Thomas AR, Shearer JR (eds) Internet searching and indexing: the subject approach. The Haworth Information Press, New York, pp 143–155
Broughton V, Slavic A (2007) Building a faceted classification for the humanities: principles and procedures. J Document 63(5):727–754. Pre-print available at: http://www.dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1976/. Cited 30 August 2007
BS8723 (2005) Structured vocabularies for information retrieval. Part 1: definitions, symbols and abbreviation; Part 2: Thesauri. London, British Standards Institution
Cochrane PA, Johnson EJ (1996) Visual Dewey: DDC in a hypertextual browser for the library user. In: Green R (ed) Knowledge organization and change: proceedings of the fourth international ISKO conference, 15–18 July 1996, Washington DC. Indeks Verlag, Frankfurt/Main, pp 95–106
Cochrane PA, Markey K (1985) Preparing for the use of classification in online cataloging systems and in online catalogs. Inform Technol Libr 4(2):91–111
Concise UNIMARC Format for Classification Data (2000) IFLA, PUC, 31 October. Available at: http://www.ifla.org/VI/3/p1996-1/concise.htm. Cited 30 August 2007
Crystal A (2007) Facets are fundamental: rethinking information architecture frameworks. Techn Commun Online 54(1):16–26
Denton W (2003) How to make a faceted classification and put it on the web. http://www.miskatonic.org/library/facet-web-howto.html. Cited 30 August 2007
Devadason FJ (2003) Faceted indexing application for organizing accessing Internet resources. In: McIlwaine IC (ed) Subject retrieval in a networked environment. Proceedings of the IFLA satellite meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14–16 August 2001. K. G. Saur, München, pp 147–159
Ellis D, Vasconcelos A (2000) The relevance of facet analysis for world wide web subject organization and searching. In: Thomas AR, Shearer JR (eds) Internet searching and indexing: the subject approach. Binghamton, NY, Haworth, pp 97–114
Gnoli C (2007) Progress in synthetic classification: towards unique definition of concepts. Extensions & Corrections to the UDC 29 (in press). Pre-print available at http://www.dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1945/. Cited 30 August 2007
Gnoli C, Hong M (2006) Freely faceted classification for Web-based information retrieval. New Rev Hypermedia Multimedia 12(1):63–81
Gödert W (1991) Facet classification in online retrieval. Int Classif 18(2):98–105
Gopinath MA, Prasad ARD (1994) A knowledge representation model for analytico-synthetic classification. In: Albrechtsen H, Oernager S (eds) Knowledge organization and quality management: proceedings of the third international ISKO conference, 20–24 June 1994, Copenhangen, Denmark. Index Verlag, Frankfurt/Main, pp 320–327
Guenther RS (1996) Bringing the Library of Congress Classification into the computer age: converting LCC into machine-readable form. In: Green R (ed) Knowledge organization and change: proceedings of the fourth international ISKO conference, 15–18 July 1996, Washington DC. Indeks Verlag, Frankfurt/Main, pp 26–32
Ingwersen P, Wormell I (1992) Ranganathan in the perspective of advanced information retrieval. Libri 42:184–201
Kashyap M (2003) Likeness between Ranganathan’s postulations based approach to knowledge classification and entity-relationship data modelling approach. Knowl Organ 30(1):1–19
Liu S (1996) Decomposing DDC synthesized numbers. Paper presented at the 62nd IFLA general conference Beijing, China, August 25–31, 1996. http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla62/62-sonl.htm. Cited 30 August 2007
Mandel C (1995) Change and continuity in subject authority control. The future is now: reconciling change and continuity control: proceedings of the OCLC symposium, ALA annual conference, June 23, 1995. http://www.oclc.org/oclc/man/9391ausy/mandle.htm. Cited 30 August 2007
MARC 21 Concise Format for Classification Data (2000). Update No. 7 (2006) http://www.loc.gov/marc/classification/. Cited 30 August 2007
Markey K (2006) Forty years of classification online: final chapter of future unlimited? In: Mitchell JS, Vizine-Goetz D (eds) Moving beyond the presentation layer: content and context in the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) System. The Haworth Information Press, Binghampton, NY, pp 1–63
Pollitt AS, Tinker AJ (2000) Enhanced view-based searching through the decomposition of Dewey Decimal Classification Codes. In: Beghtol C, Howarth LC, Williamson NJ (eds) Dynamism and stability of knowledge organization. Proceedings of the sixth international conference of the International Society for Knowledge Organization, 10–13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Advances in Knowledge Organization, vol 7. Ergon, Würzburg, pp 288–294
Ranganathan SR (1962) Elements of library classification, 3rd edn. Asia Publishing House, London
Riesthuis GJA (1998) Decomposition of UDC-numbers and the text of the UDC Master Reference File. In: Mustafa el Hadi W, Maniez S, Pollitt S (eds) Structures and relations in knowledge organization: proceedings of the fifth international ISKO Conference, Lille, 25–29 August 1998. Advances in knowledge organization, vol 6. Ergon, Würzburg, pp 221–228
Slavic A, Cordeiro MI (2004a) Sharing and re-use of classification systems: the need for a common data model. Signum 8:19–24. Pre-print available at http://www.dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1274/. Cited 30 August 2007
Slavic A, Cordeiro MI (2004b) Core requirements for automation of analytico-synthetic classifications. In: Mcilwaine IC (ed) Knowledge organization and the global society: proceedings 8th international ISKO conference, London, 2004 July 13–16. Ergon, Würzburg, pp 187–192. Pre-print available at http://www.dlist.sir.arizona.edu/651/. Cited 30 August 2007
Tudhope D, Koch T, Heery R (2006) Terminology services and technology: JISC state of the art review. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/terminology/JISC-review2006.html. Cited 30 August 2007
Van Dijk P (2003) eXchangeable Faceted Metadata Language – XFML Core (Last updated in 2003), http://www.xfml.org/spec/1.0.html. Cited 30 August 2007
Vickery BC (1952–1959) Notational symbols in classification: part I–V. J Document 8(1)1952: 14–32; 12(2)1956: 73–87; 13(2)1957: 72–78; 14(1)1958: 1–11; 15(1)1959: 12–16
Wajenberg AS (1983) MARC Coding of DDC for subject retrieval. Inform Technol Libr 2(3):246–251
Yee K-P et al. (2003) Faceted metadata for image search and browsing. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, 5–10 April 2003. ACM Press, New York, pp 401–408, http://www.flamenco.berkeley.edu/papers/flamenco-chi03.pdf. Cited 30 August 2007
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Slavic, A. Faceted Classification: Management and Use. Axiomathes 18, 257–271 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-007-9030-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-007-9030-z