Abstract
This paper discusses certain conceptual tensions in a set of archeological texts from the Warring States period, the Guodian corpus. One of the central themes of the Guodian corpus is the disanalogy between spontaneous, natural familial relationships and artificial political relationships. This is problematic because, like many early Chinese texts, the Guodian corpus believes that political relationships must come to be characterized by unselfconsciousness and spontaneity if social order is to prevail. This tension will be compared to my earlier work on the “paradox of wu-wei (effortless action),” and the Guodian corpus’ “solution” to the problem of teaching spontaneity—drawing upon the transformative power of music—will be placed within the landscape of early “Confucian” and “Daoist” theories concerning human nature and self-cultivation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This is a clever wordplay on the traditional saying, “explaining books from Ying according to a Yan interpretation” (originally from the Hanfeizi), which refers to a distorted interpretation. Pang’s point is that the loss of character diversity after the Qin unification has caused us to systematically misread ancient texts.
References
Allan, Sarah, and Crispin Williams, eds. 2000. The Guodian Laozi: Proceedings of the International Conference, Dartmouth College, May 1998. Berkeley, CA: Society for the Study of Early China.
Barkow, Jerome, Leda Cosmides & John Tooby, eds. 1992. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brindley, Erica. 2006a. “Music and ‘Seeking One’s Heart-Mind’ in the ‘Xing Zi Ming Chu.’” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 5.2: 247–255.
––––––. 2006b. “Music, Cosmos, and the Development of Psychology in Early China.” T’oung Pao 92: 1–49.
Buss, David, ed. 2005. The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Chen, Ning. 2002. “The Ideological Background of the Mencian Discussion of Human Nature: A Reexamination.” In Mencius: Contexts and Interpretations. Ed. Alan Chan. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Chen, Wei 陳偉. 1999. “郭店楚簡《六德》諸篇零釋 (Miscellaneous Comments on Various Chapters of the Guodian Chu Bamboo Text Liude).” Wuhan Daxue Xuebao 5: 29–33.
Cook, Scott. 1995. Unity and Diversity in the Musical Thought of Warring States China. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.
––––––. 2004. “The Debate over Coercive Rulership and the ‘Human Way’ in Light of Recently Excavated Warring States Texts.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 64: 399–440.
–––––– (as 顧史考). 2006. 郭店楚簡先秦儒書宏微觀 (Broad and Detailed Perspectives on the Pre-Qin Guodian Confucian Bamboo Texts). Taibei 臺北: Xuesheng Shuju 學生書局.
Cosmides, Leda, and John Tooby. 2005. “Neurocognitive Adaptations Designed for Social Exchange.” In Buss 2005.
Csikszentmihalyi, Mark. 2004. Material Virtue: Ethics and the Body in Early China. Leiden: Brill.
Ding, Yuanzhi 丁原植. 2004. 郭店楚簡 :儒家佚籍四種釋析 (Guodian Chu Bamboo Texts: Interpretation and Analysis of Four Lost Confucian Documents). 2nd edition. Taibei: Taiwan Guji 台灣古籍.
Dunbar, Robin. 1998. “The Social Brain Hypothesis.” Evolutionary Anthropology 6: 178–190.
Ekman, Paul. 2003. Emotions Revealed: Recognizing Faces and Feelings to Improve Communication and Emotional Life. Times Books.
Fraser, Chris. 2007. “On Wu-wei as a Unifying Metaphor: A Review of Effortless Action: Wu-wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China by Edward Slingerland.” Philosophy East & West 57: 97–106.
Goldin, Paul. 2000. “Xunzi in the Light of the Guodian Manuscripts.” Early China 25: 113–46.
Guo, Yi 郭沂. 1998. “郭店楚簡《天降大常》 (《成之聞之》) 篇疏證 (Glosses on and Evidentiary Examination of The Guodian Chu Bamboo Text Heaven Sends Down the Great Constancy (Cheng Zhi Wen Zhi).” Kongzi Yanjiu 孔子研究 3: 61–68.
––––––. 2000. “郭店楚簡與中國哲學 (論網) (Guodian Chu Bamboo Texts and Chinese Philosophy [Outline]).” In Wuhan Daxue 2000.
Henrich, Joseph. Manuscript. “Evolutionary Linkages Between Cooperation, Religion, and Ritual: The Evolution of Inferentially Potent Displays and Their Implications for Cultural Evolution.” Available in draft form from <http://www.psych.ubc.ca/~henrich/#manuscripts>.
Ivanhoe, Philip J. 1993/2000. Confucian Moral Self-Cultivation. 2nd Edition. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
––––––. 2007. “The Paradox of Wuwei?” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34: 277–287.
––––––. forthcoming. “The Value of Spontaneity.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy.
Jingmenshi Bowuguan 荊門市博物館. 1998. 郭店楚墓竹簡 (Bamboo Texts from a Chu Tomb at Guodian). Beijing 北京: Wenwu 文物.
Klein, Richard. 1989. The Human Career: Human Biological and Cultural Origins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kline, T.C. 2000. “Moral Agency and Motivation in the Xunzi.” In Kline & Ivanhoe 2000.
Kline, T.C. and P.J. Ivanhoe, eds. 2000. Virtue, Nature and Moral Agency in the Xunzi. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
Knoblock, John. 1988. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works (Vol. 1). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
––––––. 1994. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works (Vol. 3). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Li, Ling 李零. 2002a. 郭店楚簡校讀記 (Notes on Corrected Readings of the Guodian Chu Bamboo Texts). Beijing 北京:: Beijing Daxue 北京大學.
––––––. 2002b. “上博楚簡校讀記 (之一) (Notes on Corrected Readings of Some Shanghai Museum Bamboo Texts (Part 1)).” http://www.jianbo.org/Wssf/2002/liling01-1.htm.
Luo, Yunhuan 羅運環. 2000. “郭店楚簡有關君臣論述的研究 (Research On Passages Related to the Lord-Minister Relationship in the Guodian Chu Bamboo Texts)”. In Wuhan Daxue 2000.
Liao, Mingchun 廖明春. 2000. “郭店楚簡 《成之聞之》 篇校釋 (A Revised Interpretation of the Guodian Chu Bamboo Text Cheng Zhi Wen Zhi).” Qinghua Jianbo Yanjiu 清華簡帛研究 1: 89–111.
Liu, Xiusheng, and P.J. Ivanhoe, eds. 2002. Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
Nivison, David. 1996a. “The Paradox of ‘Virtue.’” In The Ways of Confucianism: Investigations in Chinese Philosophy. Ed. Bryan Van Norden. Chicago and La Salle, Il: Open Court.
––––––. 1996b. “Can Virtue be Self-Taught?” In The Ways of Confucianism: Investigations in Chinese Philosophy. Ed. Bryan Van Norden. Chicago and La Salle, Il: Open Court.
––––––. 1996c. “Weakness of Will in Ancient Chinese Philosophy.” In The Ways of Confucianism: Investigations in Chinese Philosophy. Ed. Bryan Van Norden. Chicago and La Salle, Il: Open Court.
Pang, Pu. 2000. “郢燕書說: 郭店楚簡中山三器心旁文字試說 (On Books from Ying and Yan:Footnote
This is a clever wordplay on the traditional saying, “explaining books from Ying according to a Yan interpretation” (originally from the Hanfeizi), which refers to a distorted interpretation. Pang’s point is that the loss of character diversity after the Qin unification has caused us to systematically misread ancient texts.
Preliminary Discussion of Characters with the Heart Radical from the Guodian Bamboo Texts and the Zhongshansan Vessel).” In Wuhan Daxue 2000.––––––. 2002. “上博藏簡零箋 (一) (Miscellaneous Notes on the Shanghai Museum Bamboo Strips [Part One]).” www/jianbo.org/Wssf/2002/pangpu01.htm.
Puett, Michael. 2004. “The Notion of Qing in Early Chinese Thought.” In Love and Emotion in Traditional Chinese Literature. Ed. Halvor Eifring. Leiden: Brill.
Qiu, Xigui. 2000. “糾正我在郭店 〈老子〉 簡釋讀中的一個錯誤—關於 ‘絕偽棄詐’ (Correcting a Mistake That I Made in My Interpretative Reading of the Guodian Laozi Concerning the Phrase ‘Get Rid of Hypocrisy and Abandon Falsity’).” In Wuhan Daxue 2000.
Richerson, Peter and Robert Boyd. 1999. “Complex Societies: The Evolutionary Origins of a Crude Superorganism.” Human Nature 10: 253–289.
Richter, Matthias. 2006. “Tentative Criteria for Discerning Individual Hands in the Guodian Manuscripts.” In Rethinking Confucianism: Selected Papers from the Third International Conference on Excavated Manuscripts, Mount Holyoke College, April 2004. Ed. Xing Wen. San Antonio: Trinity University Press.
Roth, Harold. 1999. Original Tao: Inward Training and the Foundations of Taoist Mysticism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Scarpari, Maurizio. 2002. “La figura e il ruolo di 告子 Gaozi (The Figure and The Role of Gaozi).” In Scarpari, Studio sul Mengzi. Venezia: Cafoscarina.
Shanghai Bowuguan Cang Zhanguo Chuzhu Shu 上海博物館藏戰國楚竹書 (Warring States Chu Bamboo Texts Held by the Shanghai Museum). Vols. 1–5. 2001–2005. General editor Ma Chengyuan 馬承源. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe 上海古籍出版社.
Shaughnessy, Edward. 2006. Rewriting Early Chinese Texts. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Shun, Kwong-loi. 1997. Mencius and Early Chinese Thought. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
––––––. 2004. “A Review of Effortless Action: Wu-wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China by Edward Slingerland.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 64: 511–516.
Slingerland, Edward. 2003a. Confucius: Analects. Cambridge, MA: Hackett Publishing Company.
––––––. 2003b. Effortless Action: Wu–wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tao, Lei 陶磊. 2001. “郭店儒簡與告子學說 (Theories Concerning the Relationship Between the Guodian Confucian Bamboo Texts and the Figure of Gaozi).” In 郭店楚簡與早期儒家 (Guodian Chu Bamboo Texts and Early Confucianism). Ed. Pang Pu. Taibei 臺北: Taiwan Guji Chuban Youxian Gonsi 台灣古籍出版有限公司.
Watson, Burton, trans. 1968. The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wuhan Daxue Zhongguo Wenhua Yanjiuyuan 武漢大學中國文化研究院, ed. 2000. 郭店楚簡國際學術研討會 (Proceedings of The International Symposium on the Guodian Chu Bamboo Texts). Wuhan 武漢: Hubei Renmin Chubanshe 湖北人民出版社.
Yang, Rubin 楊儒賓. 2000. “子思學派試探 (Preliminary Investigations Concerning the School of Zisi).” In Wuhan Daxue 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Slingerland, E. The Problem of Moral Spontaneity in the Guodian Corpus. Dao 7, 237–256 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-008-9066-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-008-9066-9