Skip to main content
Log in

Confusion and dependence in uses of history

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many people argue that history makes a special difference to the subjects of biology and psychology, and that history does not make this special difference to other parts of the world. This paper will show that historical properties make no more or less of a difference to biology or psychology than to chemistry, physics, or other sciences. Although historical properties indeed make a certain kind of difference to biology and psychology, this paper will show that historical properties make the same kind of difference to geology, sociology, astronomy, and other sciences. Similarly, many people argue that nonhistorical properties make a special difference to the nonbiological and the nonpsychological world. This paper will show that nonhistorical properties make the same difference to all things in the world when it comes to their causal behavior and that historical properties make the same difference to all things in the world when it comes to their distributions. Although history is special, it is special in the same way to all parts of the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amundson R., Lauder G. (1994) Function without purpose: The uses of causal role function in evolutionary biology. Biology and Philosophy 9: 443–469. doi:10.1007/BF00850375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariew A. (2003) Ernst Mayr’s ‘ultimate/proximate’ distinction reconsidered and reconstructed. Biology and Philosophy 18: 553–565. doi:10.1023/A:1025565119032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker T. C. M., Milinski M. (1991) Sequential female choice and the previous male effect in sticklebacks. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 29: 205–210. doi:10.1007/BF00166402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker T. C. M., Milinski M. (1993) The advantages of being red: Sexual selection in the stickleback. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology 23: 287–300. doi:10.1080/10236249309378870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel W. (1986) Teleological functional analyses and the hierarchical organization of nature. In: Rescher N. (eds) Teleology and natural science. University Press of America, Landham, MD, pp 26–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel W., Mundale J. (1999) Multiple realizability revisited: Linking cognitive and neural states. Philosophy of Science 66: 175–207. doi:10.1086/392683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. A., Foster, S. A. (eds) (1994) The evolutionary biology of the threespine stickleback. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickle J. (2006a) Reducing mind to molecular pathways: Explicating the reductionism implicit in current cellular and molecular neuroscience. Synthese 151: 411–434. doi:10.1007/s11229-006-9015-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickle J. (2006b) Ruthless reductionism in recent neuroscience. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C 36: 134–140. doi:10.1109/TSMCC.2006.871130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickle J. (2007) Ruthless reductionism and social cognition. Journal of Physiology-Paris 101: 230–235. doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2007.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickle J. (2008) Real reduction in real neuroscience: Metascience, not philosophy of science (and certainly not metaphysics!). In: Hohwy J., Kallestrup J. (eds) Being reduced: New essays on reduction, explanation, and causation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 34–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickle J., Avison M., Schmithorst V., Landreth A., Holland S. (2003) Bridging the cognitive-cellular neuroscience gap empirically: A study combining physiology, modeling and fMRI. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 15: 161–175. doi:10.1080/0952813021000055225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R. (1992) Constructivism, realism, and philosophical method. In: Earman J. (eds) Inference, explanation, and other frustrations: Essays in the philosophy of science. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp 131–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R. (1999) Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa. In: Wilson R.A. (eds) Species: New interdisciplinary essays. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R. (1999b) Kinds, complexity and multiple realization. Philosophical Studies 95: 67–98. doi:10.1023/A:1004511407133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. (1999c). Kinds as the ‘Workmanship of men’: Realism, constructivism, and natural kinds. In J. Nida-Rümelin (Ed.), Rationalität, realismus, revision: Proceedings of the third international congress, Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie, de Gruyter (pp. 52–89).

  • Boyd R. (2001) Reference, (in)commensurability and meanings: Some (perhaps) unanticipated complexities. In: Hoyningen-Huene P., Sankey H. (eds) Incommensurability and related matters. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks D., McLennan D. (1991) Phylogeny, ecology, and behavior: A research program in comparative biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter W. R., Hestevold H. S. (1994) On passage and persistence. American Philosophical Quarterly 31: 269–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan Y. F., Marks M. E., Jones F. C., Villarreal G., Shapiro M. D., Brady S. D. et al (2010) Adaptive evolution of pelvic reduction in sticklebacks by recurrent deletion of a Pitx1 enhancer. Science 327: 302–305. doi:10.1126/science.1182213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colosimo P., Hosemann K., Balabhadra S., Villareal G., Dickson M., Grimwood J. et al (2005) Widespread parallel evolution in sticklebacks by repeated fixation of ectodysplasin alleles. Science 307: 1928–1933. doi:10.1126/science.1107239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colosimo P., Peichel C., Nereng K., Blackman B., Shapiro M., Schluter D. et al (2004) The genetic architecture of parallel armor plate reduction in threespine sticklebacks. PLoS Biol 2(5): E109. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins R. (1975) Functional analysis. Journal of Philosophy 72: 741–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins R. (2002) Neo-teleology. In: Cummins R., Ariew A., Perlman M. (eds) Functions: New essays in the philosophy of psychology and biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 157–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies P. S. (1996) Discovering the functional mesh: On the methods of evolutionary psychology. Minds and Machines 6: 559–585. doi:10.1007/BF00389659

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies P. S. (2000) The nature of natural norms: Why selected functions are systemic capacity functions. Nous 34: 85–107. doi:10.1111/0029-4624.00203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies P. S. (2001) Norms of nature: Naturalism and the nature of functions. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske F. (1998) Action and autonomy. In: Norton J., Earman J. (eds) Cosmos of science. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA, pp 515–529

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Zmura M., Deng S., Lappas T., Thorpe S., Srinivasan R. (2009) Toward EEG sensing of imagined speech. In: Jacko J. A. (eds) Human–computer interaction: New trends, part I, HCII 2009, LNCS 5610. Springer, Berlin, pp 40–48. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02574-7_5

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder C. (1995) A different kind of natural kind. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73: 516–531. doi:10.1080/00048409512346871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elder C. (1996) On the reality of medium-sized objects. Philosophical Studies 83: 191–211. doi:10.1007/BF00354288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elder C. (2004) Real natures and familiar objects. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Enc B. (1995) Units of behavior. Philosophy of Science 62: 523–542. doi:10.1086/289884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enc B., Adams F. (1992) Functions and goal directedness. Philosophy of Science 59: 635–654. doi:10.1086/289699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald G. J. (1993) Seeing red, turning red. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 3: 286–292. doi:10.1007/BF00043931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel A. (1981) Forms of explanation. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P. (1994) A modern history theory of functions. Nous 28: 344–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grantham T., Nichols S. (1999) Evolutionary psychology: Ultimate explanations and Panglossian predictions. In: Hardcastle V.G. (eds) Where biology meets psychology: Philosophical essays. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 47–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, P. E. (1996). Darwinism, process structuralism and natural kinds. Philosophy of Science, 63(Supplement: PSA 1996 Contributed Papers), S1–S9. doi:10.1086/289930

  • Griffiths P. E. (1997) What emotions really are: The problem of psychological categories. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths P.E. (1999) Squaring the circle: Natural kinds with historical essences. In: Wilson R.A. (eds) Species: New interdisciplinary essays. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardcastle V.G. (1999) Understanding functions: A pragmatic approach. In: Hardcastle V.G. (eds) Where biology meets psychology: Philosophical essays. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes J. (2008) Detecting deception from neuroimaging signals—a data-driven perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12: 126–127. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes J. (2009) Decoding visual consciousness from human brain signals. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13: 194–202. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes J., Rees G. (2006) Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 7: 523–534. doi:10.1038/nrn1931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes J., Sakai K., Rees G, Gilbert S., Frith C., Passingham R. (2007) Reading hidden intentions in the human brain. Current Biology 17: 323–328. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.11.072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry A., Bolnick D., Berner D., Peichel C. (2009) Along the speciation continuum in stickleback. Journal of Fish Biology 75: 2000–2036. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02419.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa M., Mori S. (2000) Mating success and male courtship behaviors in three populations of the threespine stickleback. Behaviour 137: 1065–1080. doi:10.1163/156853900502439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa M., Mori S., Nagata Y. (2006) Intraspecific differences in patterns of courtship behaviours between the Pacific Ocean and Japan Sea forms of the three-spined stickleback. Journal of Fish Biology 69: 938–944. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01135.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Just M. A., Cherkassky V. L., Aryal S., Mitchell T. M. (2010) A neurosemantic theory of concrete noun representation based on the underlying brain codes. PLos ONE 5: e8622. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasting J., Catling D. (2003) Evolution of a habitable planet. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 41: 429–463. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.41.071601.170049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay K. N., Gallant J. L. (2009) I can see what you see. Nature Neuroscience 12: 245–246. doi:10.1038/nn0309-245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay K. N., Naselaris T., Prenger R. J., Gallant J. L. (2008) Identifying natural images from human brain activity. Nature 452: 352–355. doi:10.1038/nature06713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J. (1991) Dretske on how reasons explain behavior. In: McLaughlin B. (eds) Dretske and his critics. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA, pp 52–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsley D., Peichel C. (2007) The molecular genetics of evolutionary change in sticklebacks. In: Ostlund-Nilsson S., Mayer I., Huntingford F. A. (eds) Biology of the three-spine stickleback. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 41–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitano J., Mori S., Peichel C. (2007) Phenotypic divergence and reproductive isolation between sympatric forms of Japanese threespine sticklebacks. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 91: 671–685. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00824.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitano, J., Mori, S., & Peichel, C. (2008). Divergence of male courtship displays between sympatric forms of anadromous threespine stickleback. Behaviour, 145, 443–461. http://www.brill.nl/beh.

  • Kitano J., Ross J. A., Mori S., Kume M., Jones F. F., Chan Y. F. et al (2009) A role for a neo-sex chromosome in stickleback speciation. Nature 461: 1079–1083. doi:10.1038/nature08441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kump L. R., Kasting J., Crane R. (2004) The Earth system. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauder G. V. (1995) On the inference of function from structure. In: Thomason J. J. (eds) Functional morphology and vertebrate paleontology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon J., Mori S., Blackman B., Kingsley D., Jamieson L., Chou J. et al (2004) Evidence for ecology’s role in speciation. Nature 429: 294–298. doi:10.1038/nature02556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon J. S., Rundle H. D. (2002) Speciation in nature: The threespine stickleback model systems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17: 480–488. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02579-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKitrick J. (2003) A case for extrinsic dispositions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81: 155–174. doi:10.1080/713659629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLennan, D. (1991). Integrating phylogeny and experimental ethology: From pattern to process. Evolution, 45, 1773–1789. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2409831.

  • McLennan, D. (1993). Phylogenetic relationships in the Gasterosteidae: An updated tree based on behavioral characters with a discussion of homoplasy. Copeia, 1993(2), 318–326. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1447132.

  • McLennan D. (2007) The umwelt of the three-spined stickleback. In: Ostlund-Nilsson S., Mayer I., Huntingford F. A. (eds) Biology of the three-spine stickleback. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 179–224

    Google Scholar 

  • McLennan D., Brooks D., McPhail J. D. (1988) The benefits of communication between comparative ethology and phylogenetic systematics: A case study using gasterosteid fishes. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66: 2177–2190. doi:10.1139/z88-325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLennan D., McPhail J. D. (1989a) Experimental investigations of the evolutionary significance of sexually dimorphic nuptial colouration in Gasterosteus aculeatus (L.): Temporal changes in the structure of the male mosaic signal. Canadian Journal of Zoology 67: 1767–1777. doi:10.1139/z89-253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLennan D., McPhail J. D. (1989b) Experimental investigations of the evolutionary significance of sexually dimorphic nuptial colouration in Gasterosteus aculeatus (L.): The relationship between male colour and male behaviour. Canadian Journal of Zoology 67: 1778–1782. doi:10.1139/z89-254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merricks T. (1994) Endurance and indiscernibility. Journal of Philosophy 91: 165–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merricks T. (1995) On the incompatibility of enduring and perduring entities. Mind 104: 523–531. doi:10.1093/mind/104.415.521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merricks T. (1999) Persistence, parts, and presentism. Noûs 33: 421–438. doi:10.1111/0029-4624.00162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M., Bakker T. C. M. (1990) Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males. Nature 344: 330–333. doi:10.1038/344330a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller R. W. (1978) Methodological individualism and social explanation. Philosophy of Science 45: 387–414. doi:10.1086/288814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller C., Beleza S., Pollen A., Schluter D., Kittles R., Shriver M., Kingsley D. (2007) cis-Regulatory changes in Kit Ligand expression and parallel evolution of pigmentation in sticklebacks and humans. Cell 131: 1179–1189. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millikan R. (1989) In defense of proper functions. Philosophy of Science 56: 288–302. doi:10.1086/289488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millikan R. (1996) On swampkinds. Mind & Language 11: 103–117. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.1996.tb00035.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millikan R. (1999) Historical kinds and the special sciences. Philosophical Studies 95: 45–65. doi:10.1023/A:1004532016219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millikan R. (2000) On clear and confused ideas: An essay about substance concepts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell T. M., Shinkareva S. V., Carlson A., Chang K.-M., Malave V. L., Mason R. A. et al (2008) Predicting human brain activity associated with the meanings of nouns. Science 320: 1191–1195. doi:10.1126/science.1152876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundale J., Bechtel W. (1996) Integrating neuroscience, psychology, and evolutionary biology through a teleological conception of function. Minds and Machines 6: 481–505. doi:10.1007/BF00389655

    Google Scholar 

  • Naselaris T., Prenger R., Kay K., Oliver M., Gallant J. (2009) Bayesian reconstruction of natural images from human brain activity. Neuron 63: 902–915. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palatucci, M., Pomerleau, D. A., Hinton, G. E., & Mitchell, T. (2009). Zero-shot learning with semantic output codes. In Y. Bengio, D. Schuurmans, J. Lafferty, C. K. I. Williams, & A. Culotta (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, (vol. 22, pp. 1410–1418).

  • Papineau D. (2001) The rise of physicalism. In: Gillett C., Loewer B. (eds) Physicalism and its discontents. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Papineau D. (2009) The causal closure of the physical and naturalism. In: McLaughlin B., Beckermann A., Walter S. (eds) The Oxford handbook of philosophy of mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 53–65

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pelkwijk J., Tinbergen N. (1937) Eine reizbiologische Analyse einiger Verhaltensweisen von Gasterosteus aculeatus L. Zeitschrift Für Tierpsychologie 1: 193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Press F., Siever R., Jordan T., Grotzinger J. (2003) Understanding Earth (4th ed.). W.H. Freeman Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior E., Pargetter R., Jackson F. (1982) Three theses about dispositions. American Philosophical Quarterly 19: 251–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe M., Baube C., Loew E., Phillips J. (2004) Optimal mechanisms for finding and selecting mates: How threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) should encode male throat colors. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 190: 241–256. doi:10.1007/s00359-004-0493-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland W. (1984) The relationships among nuptial coloration, aggression, and courtship in male threespine sticklebacks. Canadian Journal of Zoology 62: 999–1004. doi:10.1139/z84-141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland W. (1994) The proximal basis of stickleback behavior: An evolutionary perspective. In: Bell M.A., Foster S.A. (eds) The evolutionary biology of the threespine stickleback. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 297–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland W., Sevenster P. (1985) Sign stimuli in sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus): A re-examination and extension of some classic experiments. Behaviour 93: 241–257. doi:10.1163/156853986X00919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saidel E. (2001) Teleosemantics and the epiphenomenality of content. Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplement 27: 139–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Schluter D., Marchinko K. B., Barrett R. D. H., Rogers S. M. (2010) Natural selection and the genetics of adaptation in threespine stickleback. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 65: 2479–2486. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro M., Bell M., Kingsley D. (2006) Parallel genetic origins of pelvic reduction in vertebrates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103: 13753–13758. doi:10.1073/pnas.0604706103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro M., Marks M., Peichel C., Blackman B., Nereng K., Jónsson B. et al (2004) Genetic and developmental basis of evolutionary pelvic reduction in threespine sticklebacks. Nature 428: 717–723. doi:10.1038/nature02415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro M., Summers B., Balabhadra S., Aldenhoven J., Miller A., Cunningham C. et al (2009) The genetic architecture of skeletal convergence and sex determination in ninespine sticklebacks. Current Biology 19: 1140–1145. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinkareva, S. V., Mason, R. A., Malave, V. L., Wang, W., Mitchell, T. M., & Just, M. A. (2008). Using fMRI brain activation to identify cognitive states associated with perception of tools and dwellings. PLoS One, 3, e1394, 1–9. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001394.

  • Shoemaker, S. (1980). Causality and properties. Reprinted in Shoemaker, S. (2003). Identity, cause, and mind: Philosophical essays, expanded edition (pp. 206–233). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Slutsky D. (2001) Causally inefficacious moral properties. Southern Journal of Philosophy 39: 595–610. doi:10.1111/j.2041-6962.2001.tb01835.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober E. (1995) Natural selection and distributive explanation: A reply to Neander. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46: 384–397. doi:10.1093/bjps/46.3.384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan R., Thorpe S., Deng S., Lappas T., D’Zmura M. (2009) Decoding attentional orientation from EEG spectra. In: Jacko J. A. (eds) Human–computer interaction, new trends, part I, HCII 2009, LNCS 5610. Springer, Berlin, pp 176–183. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02574-7_20

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen N. (1951) The study of instinct. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen N. (1952) The curious behavior of the stickleback. Scientific American 187: 22–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner D. (2005) Local underdetermination in historical science. Philosophy of Science 72: 209–230. doi:10.1086/426851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh D. (1996) Fitness and function. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47: 553–574. doi:10.1093/bjps/47.4.553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh D. (1999) Alternative individualism. Philosophy of Science 66: 628–648. doi:10.1086/392758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh D., Ariew A. (1996) A taxonomy of functions. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26: 493–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters C. K. (1998) Causal regularities in the biological world of contingent distributions. Biology and Philosophy 13: 5–36. doi:10.1023/A:1006572017907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilz K. J. (1970) Causal and functional analysis of dorsal pricking and nest activity in the courtship of the three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus. Animal Behavior 18: 115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooton R. J. (1976) The biology of the sticklebacks. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooton R. J. (1984) A functional biology of sticklebacks. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Slutsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Slutsky, D. Confusion and dependence in uses of history. Synthese 184, 261–286 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9785-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9785-4

Keywords

Navigation