Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to highlightthe complexities in making decisions in an ethical wayevidenced by the current dispute over native landrights in contemporary Australia. The caseillustrates an example of a moral issue that involvesmaking a management choice. One approach which givespractice in four questions that the managementpractitioner can ask when faced with a moral dilemmais described. The case involves an on-going situationin which the Australian Government was faced withsupporting the land claims of either indigenousgroups or land holding pastoralists. TheGovernment, therefore, was on the horns of a classicdilemma, having to decide between two groups eachseeking `justice' and `fairness'.The paper refers to contemporary authorities such asRawls, De George, Paine and Badaracco (Jnr). In thecontext of ethical decision making, the main eventsleading to the present dilemma are presented. Thecase study includes a summary outlining the AustralianGovernment's Ten Point Plan response to thedilemma and a summary of the perceived problems forbusiness development where native title is recognised. These can be used to provide students in businessethics classes with an opportunity to recognise anddebate the rights, wrongs and complexities of moralissues as well as appropriate managerial decisionmaking.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
'Attorney-General' Legal Practice', 1996, Native Title Legislation with Commentary, Australian Government Publishing Service.
Badaracco, Jr. Joseph L.: 1995, Business Ethics Roles and Responsibilities, Chicago: Irwin.
Badaracco, Jr. Joseph L.: 1992, 'Four Spheres of Executive Responsibility', California Management Review 34(3), Spring.
Brennan, S.J. Frank: 1997, Public Address 20 April, Kensington, Western Australia.
Butt, P. and R. Eagleson: 1993, MABO What the High Court Said, Federation Press, Annandale, NSW.
'Commonwealth of Australia', 1993, MABO The High Court Decision on Native Title Discussion Paper.
De George, R.T.: 1995, Business Ethics, 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall & 1993 Competing with Integrity in International Business, Oxford University Press, New York.
Dunn, J.: 1984, Locke, Past Masters, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Fryer-Smith, Stephanie, 1997, Seminar on Native Title, 12 November, Curtin Business School, Western Australia.
Laslett, P.: 1988, 'Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought', Locke Two Treatises of Government, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Maddock, K.: 1983, Your Land is Our Land Aboriginal Land Rights, Penguin Books Australia.
Native Title Amendment Bill, 1997, Explanatory Memorandum 9–12.
Paine, L.S.: 1996, 'Moral Thinking in Management', Business Ethics Quarterly 6(4), October.
Piper, T.R., M.C. Gentile and S.D. Parks: 1993, Can Ethics Be Taught? Perspectives, Challenges, and Approaches at Harvard Business School. Mass: Harvard Business School, Boston.
The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, The House of Representatives, 1997, Native Title Amendment Bill, Explanatory Memorandum.
Plato (trans. P. Shorey), 1982, Plato V. Republic 1, Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J.: 1971, Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Stephenson, M.A. and S. Ratnalpa: 1993, Mabo: A Judicial Revolution The Aboriginal land Rights Decision and Its Impact on Australian Law, University of Queensland Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Small, M.W., Dickie, L. Teasing Ethical Decision Making Dilemmas: A Case Study of Land Rights Issues. Teaching Business Ethics 4, 43–55 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009803126598
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009803126598