Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sex Trafficking: Trends, Challenges, and the Limitations of International Law

  • Published:
Human Rights Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The passage of the UN Protocol to Prevent, Suppress, and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children in 2000 marked the first global effort to address human trafficking in 50 years. Since the passage of the UN Protocol international organizations, non-governmental organizations, and individual states have devoted significant resources to eliminating human trafficking. This article critically examines the impact of these efforts with reference to the trends, political, and empirical challenges in data collection and the limitations of international law. I argue that current international law disproportionately addresses the criminal prosecution of traffickers at the expense of trafficking victims’ human rights, and has therefore not yet reached its full potential in the fight against human sex trafficking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Article 3 of the UN Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children.

  2. See Quirk (2007) 181–182. Brysk’s contribution to this volume makes significant progress towards incorporating trafficking and slavery into a coherent human rights framework.

  3. I use the term “victim” in a broad sense—not because these individuals are necessarily violently coerced into sex work. In many instances these victims make a rational economic decision to work in the sex industry but this too is a form of economic victimization.

  4. I present the statistics that follow acutely aware that numerical estimates of trafficking victims are notoriously politicized and unreliable. I discuss these methodological weaknesses in later sections of the paper but offer these numbers as a general overview of the scope of human sex trafficking in the world.

  5. The IOM also uses this number on website in 2010: http://www.iom.int/jahia/Jahia/activities/by-theme/regulating-migration/counter-trafficking.

  6. See also Miller and Wasileski this volume.

  7. On the intra-regional movement of sex slaves in Europe, see Kelly (2002). On intraregional movement in Asia, see Lee (2005) and Ali (2005). Kara (2009) estimates that of a total population of 1.2 million sex slaves in the world in 2006, approximately 335,000 are in South Asia and another 315,000 are in East Asia and the Pacific (18).

  8. This percentage comes from a simple calculation using Kara’s data (Kara 2009, 18). These numbers are also consistent with ILO estimates. See ILO (2008), 3.

  9. On the growing number of governments voluntarily offering data to the UNDOC, see: UNODC 2009, 12.

  10. There is growing evidence that local authorities often work in conjunction with traffickers to keep victims enslaved.

  11. Very few recent books on trafficking have chapters on Africa. An exception is Adepoju (2005).

  12. Gallagher’s work in this volume assesses the US State Department’s annual Trafficking in Persons Reports, so I refrain from discussing them here.

  13. More information can be obtained on the IOM’s counter trafficking page: http://www.iom.int/jahia/Jahia/activities/by-theme/regulating-migration/counter-trafficking.

  14. The report is available online on the UNODC’s webpage: http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/human-trafficking/global-report-on-trafficking-in-persons.html.

  15. The database is available online on UNESCO Bangkok’s site: http://www3.unescobkk.org/culture/WebTraffickingV2/Search.aspx.

  16. The new data collection efforts undertaken by IOs are detailed in section II. Anecdotal evidence of increases in the number of shelters can be found in the 2010 US TIP Report.

  17. Articles 6–8 of the treaty are devoted to protecting victims but have been interpreted to be primarily discretionary rather than mandatory (Scarpa 2008, 65).

  18. On this point, see also Dinan (2008), 74.

References

  • Adepoju, Aderanti. 2005. “Review of Research and Data on Human Trafficking in sub-Saharan Africa” in Data and Research on Human Trafficking: A Global Survey, eds. Frank Laczko and Elizbieta Gozdziak. 56–75. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, A.K.M. Masud. 2005. “Treading along a Treacherous Trail: Research on Trafficking in Persons in South Asia” in Data and Research on Human Trafficking: A Global Survey, eds. Frank Laczko and Elizbieta Gozdziak. 141–164. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International 2005. Thailand: The Plight of Burmese Migrant Workers. 7 June. ASA 39/001/2005.

  • Amnesty International. 2007. Greece Uphold the Rights of Women and Girls Trafficked for Sexual Exploitation. 12 June. EUR 25/002/2007.

  • Bales, Kevin. 2004. Disposable People: New Slavery in the Global Economy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, Kevin. 2007. Ending Slavery: How We Free Today’s Slaves. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Denise. 2005. “Methodological Challenges in Research with Trafficked Persons: Tales from the Field” in Data and Research on Human Trafficking: A Global Survey, eds. Frank Laczko and Elizbieta Gozdziak. 35–54. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brysk, Alison. Forthcoming. “Rethinking Trafficking: Human Rights and Private Wrongs” in Human Trafficking and Human Rights: Rethinking Contemporary Slavery, eds. Alison Brysk and Austin Choi-Fitzpatrick. Philadelphia: the University of Pennsylvania Press.

  • Buckley, Mary. 2009. Public Opinion in Russia on the Politics of Human Trafficking. Europe-Asia Studies 61(2): 213–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, Sally and Edward Newman. 2008. Trafficking in Humans: Social, Cultural and Political Dimensions. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carling, Jorgen. 2005. Trafficking in Women from Nigeria to Europe. Migration Information Source: http://www.migrationinformation.org/feature/display.cfm?ID=318. Accessed June 24, 2010.

  • Dinan, Kinsey Alden. 2008. “Globalization and National Sovereignty: From Migration to Trafficking” in Trafficking in Humans: Social, Cultural and Political Dimensions, eds. Sally Cameron and Edward Newman. 58–79. Tokyo: United Nations Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, Anne T. 2009. Human Rights and Human Trafficking: Quagmire or Firm Ground? A Response to James Hathaway. Virginia Journal of International Law 49 (4): 789–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinn, David. E. 2008. Defining the Problem of Trafficking: The Interplay of US Law, Donor, and NGO Engagement and the Local Context in Latin America. Human Rights Quarterly 30(1): 119–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, James C. 2008. “Human Rights Quagmire of Human Trafficking, The.” Virginia Journal of International Law 49: 1–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organization. 1998. Sex as a Sector: Economic Hardships and Incentives Fuel Growth. World of Work. September/October.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organization. 2008. ILO Action Against Trafficking in Human Beings. Available at: http://www.ilo.org/sapfl/Informationresources/ILOPublications/lang--en/docName--WCMS_090356/index.htm. Accessed June 28, 2010.

  • International Labour Organization. 2009. Trafficking in Persons: Overview of the ILO Activities against Trafficking in Persons. 1 May. Available at: http://www.ilo.org/public/english/protection/migrant/areas/trafficking.htm. Accessed June 17, 2010.

  • IOM Counter Trafficking Unit: Kosovo. 2000–2005. Return and Reintegration Project, Situation Report. February.

  • Kara, Siddharth. 2009. Sex Trafficking: Inside the Business of Modern Slavery. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Liz. 2002. Journeys of Jeopardy: A Review of Research on Trafficking in Women and Children in Europe. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laczko, Frank and Marco Gramegna. 2003. Developing Better Indicators of Human Trafficking. Brown Journal of World Affairs 10(1): 179–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, June JH. 2005. “Human Trafficking in East Asia” in Data and Research on Human Trafficking: A Global Survey, eds. Frank Laczko and Elizbieta Gozdziak. 165–201. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrot, Andrea and Nina Cummings. 2008. Sexual Enslavement of Girls and Women Worldwide. Westport: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quirk, Joel. 2007. “Trafficked into Slavery.” Journal of Human Rights 6(2): 181–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarpa, Silvia. 2008. Trafficking in Human Beings: Modern Slavery. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Charles Anthony and Heather M. Smith. Forthcoming. Human Trafficking: The Unintended Effects of United Nations Intervention. International Political Science Review.

  • Smith, Charles Anthony and Brandon Miller-de la Cuesta. Forthcoming. Human Trafficking on the Frontier of Security: The Role of UN Peacekeepers. The Human Rights Review.

  • Smith, Heather M. Forthcoming. “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Assessing the Impact of the UN and the OAS on Human Trafficking in Haiti” in Human Trafficking and Human Rights: Rethinking Contemporary Slavery, eds. Alison Brysk and Austin Choi-Fitzpatrick. Philadelphia: the University of Pennsylvania Press.

  • Tyldum, Guri and Anette Brunovskis. 2005. “Describing the Unobserved: Methodological Challenges in Empirical Studies on Human Trafficking” in Data and Research on Human Trafficking: A Global Survey, eds. Frank Laczko and Elizbieta Gozdziak. 17–34. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2002. Recommended Principles and Guidelines on Human Rights and Human Trafficking. 20 May. E/2002/68/Add.1.

  • UNICEF. 2005. Trafficking in Human Beings in South Eastern Europe. Published jointly with the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNOHCHR) and the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR). March.

  • UN Office on Drugs and Crime. 2009. Global Report on Trafficking in Persons. February. Available at: http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/human-trafficking/global-report-on-trafficking-in-persons.html. Accessed on: June 25, 2010.

  • US Congress. 2000. Trafficking Victims Protection Act. 28 October. Public Law 106–386.

  • US State Department. 2006. Trafficking in Persons Report. 5 June. Available at: http://www.state.gov/g/tip/rls/tiprpt/2006/65983.htm. Accessed on: June

  • US State Department. 2009. Trafficking in Persons Report. 16 June. Available at: http://www.state.gov/g/tip/rls/tiprpt/2009/index.htm. Accessed on: June 20, 2010.

  • US State Department. 2010. Trafficking in Persons Report. 14 June. Available at: http://www.state.gov/g/tip/rls/tiprpt/2009/index.htm. Accessed on: June 20, 2010.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather M. Smith.

Additional information

I am grateful to my research assistants, Margaret Williams and Jake Owens as well as two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, H.M. Sex Trafficking: Trends, Challenges, and the Limitations of International Law. Hum Rights Rev 12, 271–286 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-010-0185-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-010-0185-4

Keywords

Navigation