Abstract
In a 1961 interview, Beckett warded off philosophical interpretations of his work: ‘I’m no intellectual. All I am is feeling’. Despite the emotional intensity of Beckett’s post-war writing, Beckett criticism has tended to ignore this claim, preferring the kinds of philosophical readings that Beckett here rejects. In particular, Beckett criticism underestimates the element of rage in his work. This paper argues that Beckett’s post-war breakthrough is enabled by a radical reconsideration of the nature of feeling and of rage in particular. It involves the rejection of the idea of rage as pathological and the embrace of a positive conception of rage as drive or compulsion, a locus of energy and even pleasure.
This paper reads the ‘Moran’ section of Molloy as a kind of ‘rage fable’, drawing on the ancient Greek concept of thymos, of anger as a virtue. It draws on Alfred Adler’s theory of the ‘masculine protest’, with which Beckett was familiar from his extensive note-taking on Adler in 1934-5, and Sianne Ngai’s discussion of the distinction between irritation and rage. According to this reading, Moran’s report charts a narrative of thymotic liberation from the irritations of servitude, prefiguring the Unnamable’s abandonment to impersonal affective intensities. It ends by suggesting that the prose of the Trilogy might be better understood, not as a ‘syntax of weakness’ but as a ‘syntax of rage’, a stylistic correlative of the imperious drive of thymos. We might then begin to understand the Trilogy as the epic of a heroic, impersonal, implacable and liberated rage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, Alfred. 1917. The Neurotic Constitution: Outlines of a Comparative Individualistic Psychology and Psychotherapy. Translated by Bernard Glueck and John Lind. New York: Moffat, Yard and Company.
———. 1929. The Practice and Theory of Individual Psychology. Revised edition translated by P. Radin. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.
Aristotle. 1999. The Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Terence Irwin. Indianapolis: Hackett.
———. 2009. The Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by David Ross. Edited by Lesley Brown. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beckett, Samuel. 1983. Disjecta: Miscellaneous Writings and a Dramatic Fragment. Edited by Ruby Cohn. London: Calder.
———. 1993a. Murphy. London: Calder.
———. 1993b. Trilogy: Molloy, Malone Dies, The Unnamable. London: Calder.
———. 2009. The Letters of Samuel Beckett: Volume 1, 1929-1940. Edited by Martha Dow Fehsenfeld and Lois More Overbeck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2011. The Letters of Samuel Beckett: Volume 2, 1941-1956. Edited by George Craig, Martha Dow Fehsenfeld, Dan Gunn and Lois More Overbeck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. Unpublished. “Psychology Notes.” Department of Manuscripts, Trinity College Library, Dublin.
Critchley, Simon. 1999. Ethics-Politics-Subjectivity: Essays on Derrida, Levinas and Contemporary French Thought. London: Verso.
D’Aubarède, Gabriel. 1979. “Interview with Samuel Beckett.” In Samuel Beckett: The Critical Heritage. Edited by Lawrence Graver and Raymond Federman. 215-217. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Feldman, Matthew. 2004. “’Sourcing ‘Aporetics’: An Empirical Study on Philosophical Influences on the Development of Samuel Beckett’s Writing.” Ph.D. diss., Oxford Brookes University.
———. 2006. Beckett’s Books: A Cultural History of Samuel Beckett’s “Interwar Notes”. New York: Continuum.
———. 2009. “’Agnostic Quietism’ and Samuel Beckett’s Early Development.” In Samuel Beckett: History, Memory, Archive. Edited by Séan Kennedy and Katherine Weiss. 183-200. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fisher, Philip. 2002. The Vehement Passions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Harvey, Lawrence. 1970. Samuel Beckett: Poet and Critic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jeffers, Jennifer. 2009. Beckett’s Masculinity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Knowlson, James. 1996. Damned to Fame: The Life of Samuel Beckett. London: Bloomsbury.
Ngai, Sianne. 2005. Ugly Feelings. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Salisbury, Laura. 2009. ““Throw up for good”: Gagging, Compulsion and a Comedy of Ethics in the Trilogy.” In Beckett and Ethics. Edited by Russell Smith. 163-180. London: Continuum.
Schopenhauer, Arthur. 1995. The World as Will and Idea. Translated by Jill Berman. Edited by David Berman. London: J.M. Dent.
Seneca. 1995. “On Anger.” In Moral and Political Essays. Translated and edited by John M. Cooper and J.F. Procopé. 1-116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sloterdijk, Peter. 2010. Rage and Time: A Psychopolitical Investigation. Translated by Mario Wenning. New York: Columbia University Press.
Sterne, Laurence. 2003. The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman [1759-67]. Edited by Melvyn New and Joan New. London: Penguin.
Woodworth, Robert S. 1931. Contemporary Schools of Psychology. London: Methuen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, R. “Uproar, bulk, rage, suffocation, effort unceasing, frenzied and vain”: Beckett’s Transports of Rage. J Med Humanit 37, 137–147 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-015-9370-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-015-9370-4