Skip to main content
Log in

Machinic articulations: experiments in non-verbal explanation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The essay presents a novel theory of meaning-as-response inspired by the pragmatist cultural historian Morse Peckham in the mid-twentieth century. This approach is useful here in consideration of how artistic behavior can make a difference in technical culture and in relation to innovative technical practices. Continuing from Félix Guattari's notion of the machine as a partial object, this essay examines the essentialist idea of computational machines as creative collaborators which haunts the model of interaction prevailing today. Following this negative critique, the essay advances a positive approach emphasizing partiality in experimental design practices as a step toward a renewed art of living.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Thinking with Deleuze and Guattari (1995), Bruno Latour (1993) and Prigogine and Stengers(1984), it may be that an anarchic generative force literally goes further down, that at the limit the universe resists conceptualization and categorization in a plane of pure immanence. This is an interesting and daring philosophical proposition, one I don't seek to affirm or deny here.

  2. Peckham (1977) wrote “Grace Andrus de Laguna said many years ago that the language coordinates behavior, I would go further to say that language controls behavior, and I would extend this to all configurations to which there is a response, that is to nonverbal signs as well.”

  3. For an extended and provocative explanation of the “poetic” and literary function of the philosopher in relation to the ongoing narrative of ideas in Western philosophy since Plato and Kant, see Richard Rorty's work, in particular Contingency, irony, and solidarity (1989).

  4. Much of this work has been conducted alongside work projects undertaken with the Topological Media Lab and Dr. Sha Xin Wei at Georgia Tech (United States) and Concordia University (Quebec, Canada) since 2003.

  5. For convenience and shorthand I have subsumed under the label HCI those models put forward more recently by human-centered computing (HCC), including computer mediated human–human communication models and its variations The field of HCI itself is currently experiencing something of an taxonomical crisis as it tries to sort through the vastly different applications and multiple perspectives which have emerged in recent years vis-à-vis advances in information and computational technologies, as well as their expanding applications.

  6. In his essay on Artaud—“The Theatre of Cruelty and the Closure of Repetition”—Derrida (1978) is careful to distinguish between the double Artaud (1958) wrote of and the kind of doubling, or repetition that takes place through “a frightful transfer of forces/from body/to body”, including the interiorization of a presentational act by way of its movement of thought. For Derrida this movement is “irrepressible.” The unrepeatable difference “is the enigma of that which has no meaning, no presence, no legibility”—no witness. Derrida seems to say in conclusion that representation—as the infinite repetition of difference—is a necessity without there can be no possibility of life.

  7. For further discussion of the senses of intensity, see Brian Massumi's “Introduction, Concrete Is as Concrete Doesn't” (2002).

  8. For Derrida's Artaud, the theater is the only place where a gesture with the force of life can be made, and like gesture of life can be made only once (Derrida 1978).

References

  • Artaud A (1958) The theater and its double. Grove Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook P (1968) The empty space. Atheneum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida J (1978) Writing and difference. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Guattari F (1995) Chaosmosis: an ethico-aesthetic paradigm. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (1993) We have never been modern. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Massumi B (2002) Parables for the virtual: movement, affect, sensation. Duke University Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckham M (1965) Man’s rage for chaos: biology, behavior, and the arts. Chilton Books, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckham M (1977) The infinitude of pluralism. Critical Inquiry 3(4):803–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peckham M (1979) Explanation and power: the control of human behavior. Seabury Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine I, Stengers I (1984) Order out of chaos: man’s new dialogue with nature. New Science Library, Distributed by Random House, Boulder

  • Rorty R (1989) Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wick R (2000) Teaching at the Bauhaus. Hatje Cantz, Ostfildern-Ruit, Great Britain

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harry Smoak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smoak, H. Machinic articulations: experiments in non-verbal explanation. AI & Soc 26, 137–142 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-010-0293-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-010-0293-3

Keywords

Navigation