Skip to main content
Log in

Tableaux for Some Modal-Tense Logics Graham Priest’s Fashion

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The forward convergence constraint is important to time analysis. Without it, given two future moments to the same point, the time branches. This is unacceptable if one assumes that time is linear. Nevertheless, one may wish to consider time-branching in order to discuss future possibilities. One can have both a linear order for the time and branching through the combination of the tense logic semantics with those of an alethic logic which allows the evaluation of the timelines of other possible worlds. In this paper, I give the semantics and the tableaux systems for some alethic-tense logics. I review one in which worlds differ on their time orders (MT), another in which they agree on the time order (MOT), a pair of conditional tense logics (\(CT, CT^+\)), and the first-order version of MT. A brief philosophical discussion arises from every system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bull, K., and R. Segerberg, Basic modal logic, in D. M. Gabbay, and F. Guenthner, (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Springer, 2002, pp. 1–82.

  2. Carnielli, W., and M.E. Coniglio, Combining Logics, in E.N. Zalta, (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2020 edition, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2020.

  3. Correia, F., and S. Rosenkranz, On the relation between modality and tense, Inquiry 63(6):586–604, 2019.

  4. Feldman, R., Epistemology, Pearson Education, 2003.

  5. Gomez-Caminero Parejo, E.F., Tablas semánticas para lógica epistémica, Ph.D. thesis, Universidad de Sevilla, 2011.

  6. Hughes, G. E., and M. J. Cresswell, Introducción a la lógica modal, Tecnos, 1973.

  7. Hume, D., Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, 1692.

  8. Johnson, M., Tree Trimming: Four Non-Branching Rules for Priest’s Introduction toNon-Classical Logic, The Australasian Journal of Logic 12(2):97–120, 2015.

  9. Priest, G., An introduction to non-classical logic: From if to is, Cambridge 878 University Press, 2008.

  10. Rönnedal, D., Quantified temporal alethic boulesic doxastic logic, Logica Universalis 15(1):1–65, 2021.

  11. Thomason, R.H., Combinations of tense and modality, in D. M. Gabbay, and F. Guenthner, (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Springer, 2002, pp. 205–234.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I want to thank Graham Priest, who saw an early draft copy of this paper. I also want to thank my postgraduate advisor Max Fernández de Castro Tapia and my college Balam Hidalgo López, who read and commented on my work. I also want to thank Eduardo Vargas, who helped me with some translation details. Finally, thanks to two anonymous referees who made some observations that improved the first version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Presented by Richmond Thomason.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sánchez Hernández, J.C. Tableaux for Some Modal-Tense Logics Graham Priest’s Fashion. Stud Logica 110, 745–784 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-021-09974-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-021-09974-x

Keywords

Navigation