Relevance of Interdisciplinary Approach in the Study of Consciousness

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The research is devoted to justification of the interdisciplinary approach in the study of consciousness. Studying consciousness as a phenomenon is a very divergent project, the mystery of its nature and appearance makes different ways of studying consciousness possible. Besides, consciousness is an umbrella term which may be interpreted differently in different contexts. Various approaches to comprehension of consciousness have been developed nowadays in Philosophy, Psychology, Biology, Medicine, Neurosciences, Sociology, Cognitive and Computer Sciences, Linguistics and a number of other research fields. In the end of the 1980s one can notice an exceptional growth of interest in the problem of consciousness both in Philosophy and Science. The works by Bernard Baars, Daniel Dennett, Roger Penrose, Francis Crick and Christopher Koch, David Chalmers have appeared in these years. They outlined the main approaches to the study of consciousness and demonstrated that study of consciousness became an interdisciplinarity research. The research discusses the features of the phenomenon of consciousness and outlines the main theoretical issues, the most relevant of which are the “hard problem” of consciousness, the problem of mind and body, the problem of “the explanatory gap”, the question of the primacy of the brain in relation to consciousness, the place of consciousness in the modern scientific paradigm, changes of the ethical and worldview interpretation in connection with artificial intelligence, neurochips and neural network. Based on the complexity and multidimensionality of the research field associated with the problem of consciousness, the variety of approaches to studying this problem in Philosophy and Science, the controversial character of the questions raised, and the heated discussion among researches, the author concludes that interdisciplinary studies of consciousness have the greatest heuristic possibilities today.

About the authors

Julia V. Sokolova

National Research University “Moscow Power Engineering Institute”

Author for correspondence.
Email: SokolovaYulV@mpei.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4884-7185

PhD, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Philosophy, Political Science, Sociology

14 Krasnokazarmennaya St., 111250, Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Chalmers DJ. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
  2. Frith Ch. Making up the Mind: How the Brain Creates Our Mental World. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2007.
  3. Dennett D. Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking. Penguin; 2014.
  4. Baars B. A cognitive theory of consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1988.
  5. Dennett DC. Facing backwards on the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 1996;(3):4-6.
  6. Penrose R. Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989.
  7. Crick F, Koch Ch. Consciousness. Theories in Neuroscience and Philosophy of Mind. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2014.
  8. Chalmers DJ. Moving Forward on the Problem of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 1997;4(1):3-46.
  9. Chalmers DJ. The Character of Consciousness (Philosophy of Mind). New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.
  10. Baars B. In the Theater of Consciousness: The Workspace of the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press; 1997.
  11. Levine J. Purple Haze: The Puzzle of Consciousness (Philosophy of Mind Series). New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.
  12. Nagel Th. What Is It Like to Be a Bat? The Philosophical Review. 1974;83(4):435-450.
  13. Levine J. Materialism and Qualia: the Explanatory Gap. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. 1983;64(4):354-361.
  14. Gray JA. Consciousness: Creeping up on the hard problem. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
  15. Posner JB. Plum and Posner's Diagnosis of Stupor and Coma (Contemporary Neurology Series, 71). 4th Edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007.
  16. Chalmers DJ. Reality+: Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy. New York: W.W. Norton & Company; 2022.
  17. Penrose R. The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds and The Laws of Physics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.

Copyright (c) 2023 Sokolova J.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies