Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T03:03:49.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The statistical mechanics of felt uncertainty under active inference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2023

Mark Solms*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa. mark.solms@uct.ac.za

Abstract

Convincing narratives are not confabulations. Presumably they “feel right” to decision-making agents because the probabilities they assign intuitively (i.e., implicitly) to potential outcomes are plausible. Can we render explicit the calculations that would be performed by a decision-making agent to evaluate the plausibility of competing narratives? And if we can, what, exactly, makes a narrative “feel right” to an agent?

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Smith, R., Ramstead, M., & Kiefer, A. (2022). Active inference models do not contradict folk psychology. Synthese, 200, 81, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03480-wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solms, M. (2021). The hidden spring: A journey to the source of consciousness. W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Solms, M., & Friston, K. (2018) How and why consciousness arises: Some considerations from physics and physiology. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 25, 202238.Google Scholar