Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Silhouettes: A Reply from the Dark Side

  • Published:
Acta Analytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  • Burke, J. R., & Strode, F. J. (1991). Classroom exercises with the Terrell effect. American Journal of Physics, 59, 912–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, J. F., et al. (2009). The perception of 3-D shape from shadows cast onto curved surfaces. Acta Psychologica, 131(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. (1959). The apparent shape of a relativistically moving sphere. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 55, 137–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, Peter (1979). Perception and its objects. In G. J. Macdonald (Ed.), Perception and identity (pp. 97–130). London: Macmillan.

  • Terrell, J. (1959). Invisibility of the Lorentz contraction. Physical Review, 116, 1041–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thouless, R. H. (1931). “Phenomenal regression to the ‘real’ object” Brit. Psychologia, 21, 339–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, G. A., & Cottrell, J. E. (2004). The odd belief that rays exit the eye during vision. In D. T. Levin (Ed.), Thinking and seeing: visual metacognition in adults and children. Cambridge: The MIT.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Washington University, One Brookings Drive - Campus Box 1073, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA

    Roy Sorensen

Authors
  1. Roy Sorensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roy Sorensen.

Additional information

This is a reply to Casey O'Callaghan and Jonathan Westphal’s comments on Seeing Dark Things: The Philosophy of Shadows. Both attempt to soften the blow to intuition that comes from the most controversial thesis of the book: we see the backs of back-lit objects. Each characterizes the viewing of silhouettes as a kind of marginal seeing that only discloses shapes, sizes and location. In response, photographs are presented to show that silhouettes are typically three-dimensional and they often have internal structure. Consider the silhouette of a bird fluttering inside a cage; we see more than the outline of the cage. Orbiting this main point are subsidiary points about the distinction between shade and shadows, the nature of occlusion, the color black, and peculiarities of absent absences.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sorensen, R. Silhouettes: A Reply from the Dark Side. Acta Anal 26, 199–211 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-010-0103-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-010-0103-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation