Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

It’s Time for Principles-Based Accounting Ethics

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The American Institute of certified public accountants (AICPA) has promulgated a Code of Professional Conduct, which has served as the primary ethical standard for public accountants in the United States for more than 20 years. It is now out of date and needs to be replaced with a code of ethics. Just as U.S. generally accepted accounting principles are being migrated toward “principles-based accounting” as part of a convergence with international financial reporting standards, a similar process needs to occur with ethics. This article organizes the primary rules of the AICPA Code around five essential virtues: objectivity, integrity, inquisitiveness, loyalty, and trustworthiness. These virtues correspond to the general principles set forth in the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). From this virtue ethics perspective, various rules of the AICPA Code are critiqued as being inadequate at best, and poorly crafted at worst. The article concludes with the proposition that principles-based ethics serves the profession and the financial reporting process better than the current rules-based approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AICPA. (2007). Exposure draft proposal of professional ethics division: proposed interpretation 102-7, other considerations: meeting the objectives of the fundamental principles, and proposed framework for meeting the objectives of the fundamental principles, pp. 1–12. http://www.aicpa.org/download/ethics/May_15_2007_Exposure_Draft.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2010.

  • AICPA. (2008a). AICPA professional standards: code of professional conduct and bylaws, pp. 4269–6210. http://www.aicpa.org/download/about/code_of_conductbylaws.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2010.

  • AICPA. (2008b). Guide for complying with rules 102–505, pp. 1–6. http://www.aicpa.org/download/Guide_for_Complying_with_Rules_102_Through_505_11_10_08_Edited.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2010.

  • AICPA. (2009). PRP section 1000 AICPA standards for performing and reporting on peer reviews, pp. 1001–2048. http://www.aicpa.org/download/practmon/2009_stds.pdf. (Accessed January 23, 2010).

  • Arjoon, S. (2000). Virtue theory as a dynamic theory of business. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(2), 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, B., Bradbury, M., & Prangnell, H. (2006). Rules, principles and judgements in accounting standards. Abacus, 42(2), 189–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benston, G. J., Bromwich, M., & Wagenhofer, A. (2006). Principles- versus rules-based accounting standards: The fasb’s standard setting strategy. Abacus, 42(2), 165–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertland, A. (2009). Virtue ethics in business and the capabilities approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, M., & McGhee, P. (2004). Talking virtue: Professionalism in business and virtue ethics. Global Virtue Ethics Review, 5(4), 90–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, D., & Bartholomew, C. (2003). Virtues, managers and business people: Finding a place for macintyre in a business context. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(2), 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fülbier, R. U., Hitz, J.-M., & Sellhorn, T. (2009). Relevance of academic research and researchers’ role in the IASB’s financial reporting standard setting. Abacus, 45(4), 455–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaumnitz, B. R., & Lere, J. C. (2002). Contents of codes of ethics of professional business organizations in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, J. (2010). Do markets crowd out virtues? An aristotelian framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IESBA. (2009). Code of ethics for professional accountants, http://web.ifac.org/media/publications/f/code-of-ethics-for-professi-1/code-of-ethics-for-professi-2.pdf. (Accessed January 23, 2010).

  • Neill, J. D., Stovall, O. S., & Jinkerson, D. L. (2005). A critical analysis of the accounting industry’s voluntary code of conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(1/2), 101–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nobes, C. W. (2005). Rules-based standards and the lack of principles in accounting. Accounting Horizons, 19(1), 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, A. M., Cooper, J., Scarbrough, D. P., & Chilton, R. C. (1995). Changes in the code of ethics of the U.S. accounting profession 1917 and 1988: The continual quest for legitimation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(6), 507–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S. (2002). A code of ethics for corporate code of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(1/2), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whetstone, J. T. (2001). How virtue fits within business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 33(2), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert D. Spalding Jr..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spalding, A.D., Oddo, A. It’s Time for Principles-Based Accounting Ethics. J Bus Ethics 99 (Suppl 1), 49–59 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1166-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1166-5

Keywords

Navigation