Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-24T16:08:47.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Romanticizing the Tribe: Stereotypes in Literary Portraits of Tribal Cultures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Sura P. Rath*
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University

Extract

Every civilized society treasures through its folk tales and folk myths the elements of its native tribal life as points of cultural reference. The tribe not only acts as a foil to our culture, but also sustains its very being and gauges the degree of progress and change in the civilization that we uphold. This interdependence has a vital force: insofar as civilized societies define themselves by the distance they have built up between themselves and their respective primitive societies, a civilized culture without its indigenous tribal past risks the authenticity of its process of change to challenge and doubt. Hence, our adulation of distance in both time and space between ourselves and our tribal forefathers, and our eagerness to recognize, maintain, and even glorify our tribes—a necessary syllogism in our postulation of a self-preserving argument. In a peculiarly chiastic way, we thrive on our existential reliance on the very primitiveness that we seek to repudiate as characteristic of a world past. We celebrate our present by eulogizing our past, and to fit the tribes in the large scheme of our self-definition we iconize them. These idealized images hide a creative mask through which we embrace the romantic myths of our respective origins and progress; the parades we arrange for our tribal history—through performance on our streets, or through semantics in our literature—subtly embody this dependence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Research for this work was partially supported by a Faculty Research Grant from Louisiana State University in Shreveport in 1987.

References

Works Cited

The American Indians, Wellington, New Zealand, U.S. Information Service, (no date).Google Scholar
Collins, Harold R. “The Detribalization of Kurtz and the Second-Rate Helmsman” in The Western Humanities Review (Autumn 1954), p. 299310. Reproduced in Heart of Darkness and the Secret Sharer, ed. Franklin Walker, p. 227-30.Google Scholar
Conrad, Joseph. Heart of Darkness, ed. Kimbrough, Robert. New York, Norton, 1971.Google Scholar
Conrad, Joseph Heart of Darkness and The Secret Sharer, ed. Walker, Franklin. New York, Bantam, 1971.Google Scholar
Cooper, James Fenimore. The Leatherstocking Tales, 2 vols., The Library of America, 1985.Google Scholar
Guerard, Albert J.The Journey Within” in Conrad the Novelist. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard Univ. Press, 1956. Heart of Darkness, ed. Robert Kimbrough, 167-75.Google Scholar
Gurko, Leo.[Conrad's Ecological Art]” in Joseph Conrad: Giant in Exile. New York, Macmillan, 1962. The Heart of Darkness, ed. Robert Kimbrough, p. 196200.Google Scholar
Jung, C.G. Modern Man in Search of a Soul. Trans. Dell, W.S. and Banes, Cary F.. New York, Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1933.Google Scholar
Kelly, William P. Plotting America's Past: Fenimore Cooper and the Leather-stocking Tales. Carbondale, 111., Southern Illinois Univ. Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The Savage Mind. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Pizer, Donald. Realism and Naturalism in Nineteenth-Century American literature. Carbondale, 111., Southern Illinois Univ. Press, 1984.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. “The Forms of Wildness: Archaeology of an Idea” in Novak, Edward Dudley Maximillian E., ed. The Wild Man Within: An Image in Western Thought from the Renaissance to Romanticism. Pittsburgh, Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, 1972. p. 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar