Skip to main content
Log in

Heidegger's phenomenology of boredom, and the scientific investigation of conscious experience

  • Published:
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues that Heidegger's phenomenology of boredom in The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude (1983) could be a promising addition to the ‘toolbox’ of scientists investigating conscious experience. We describe Heidegger's methodological principles and show how he applies these in describing three forms of boredom. Each form is shown to have two structural moments – being held in limbo and being left empty – as well as a characteristic relation to passing the time. In our conclusion, we suggest specific ways in which Heidegger's phenomenological description can be used in scientific investigations of boredom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chalmers, D. 1995. Facing up to the problem of consciousness. In J. Shear (ed) Explaining Consciousness - The ‘Hard Problem’ (pp. 9–30). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dennett, D. 1991. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little Brown & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dennett, D. 1995. Facing Backwards on the Problem of Consciousness. In J. Shear (ed) Explaining Consciousness - The ‘Hard Problem’ (pp. 33–36). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dennett, D. C. 2001. How to protect the scientific investigation of consciousness from ideological debate. Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Freude, G. and Ullsperger, P. 2000. Slow brain potentials as a measure of effort? Applications in mental workload studies in laboratory settings. In R.W. Backs and W. Boucsein (eds)., Engineering Psychophysiology: Issues and Applications. (pp. 255–267) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Griffiths, P. E. 1997. What Emotions Really Are. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hamilton, J. A., Haier, R. J. and Buchsbaum, M. S. 1984. Intrinsic enjoyment and boredom coping scales: Validation with personality, evoked potential and attention measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 5: 183–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Heidegger, M. 1962. Sein und Zeit, 16th edition. Tuebingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heidegger, M. 1966. Discourse on Thinking. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heidegger, M. 1968. What is Called Thinking? New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heidegger, M. 1977. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heidegger, M. 1983. The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hill, A. B. and Perkins, R. E. 1985. Towards a model of boredom. British Journal of Psychology 76(2): 235–40.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Husserl, E. 1973. Logical Investigations, Volume II/1. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Inwood, M. 1999. A Heidegger Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jackendoff, R. 1987. Consciousness and the Computational Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kass, S. J., Vodanovich, S. J., Stanny, C. J. and Taylor, T. M. 2001. Watching the clock: boredom and vigilance performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills 92(3 Pt. 2): 969–976.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Krell, D. F. (ed). 1993. Martin Heidegger: Basic Writings. San Francisco: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leary, M. R., Rogers, P. A., Canfield, R. W. and Coe, C. 1986. Boredom in interpersonal encounters: Antecedents and social implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 968–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lloyd, D. 2002. Functional MRI and the Study of Human Consciousness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14(6): 818–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mikulas, W. L. and Vodanovich, S. J. 1993. The Essence of Boredom. Psychological Record 43(1).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nagel, T. 1979. What is it like to be a bat? In T. Nagel. Mortal Questions (pp. 165–180). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Perkins, R. E. and Hill, A. B. 1985. Cognitive and affective aspects of boredom. British Journal of Psychology 76: 221–234.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Petitot, J., Varela, F. J., Pachoud, B. and Roy, J-M. (eds). 1999. Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Seib, H. M. and Vodanovich, S. J. 1998. Cognitive correlates of boredom proneness: The role of private self-consciousness and absorption. Journal of Psychology 132(6): 642–652.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Varela, F. J. 1995. Neurophenomenology: A Methodological Remedy for the Hard Problem. In J. Shear (ed). Explaining Consciousness – The ‘Hard Problem’ (pp. 337–357). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. and Roach, E., 1991. The Embodied Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Velmans, M. 2000. Investigating Phenomenal Consciousness: New Methodologies and Maps. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sue P. Stafford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stafford, S.P., Gregory, W.T. Heidegger's phenomenology of boredom, and the scientific investigation of conscious experience. Phenom Cogn Sci 5, 155–169 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-9007-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-9007-6

Keywords

Navigation