Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T11:44:53.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On a Game-Theoretic Approach to a Scientific Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2023

E.-W. Stachow
E.-W. Stachow*
Affiliation:
Institut für Theoretische Physik der Universität zu Köln
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This contribution gives an outline of a game theoretic foundation of the logical structure inherent to the language of a science. Game theoretic approaches to a language were considered and developed by several authors. In this volume Saarinen examines the game theoretic semantics due to Hintikka and the dialog-game semantics due to Lorenzen. In the following I shall not re-examine the approaches by Hintikka and Lorenzen. However, some remarks about Lorenzen’s semantics are necessary since the game theoretic approach considered here is essentially based on the idea of Lorenzen to use dialog-games for a foundation of logic.

A systematic game theoretic presentation of the rules of a dialog game was given at first by Lorenz. Starting with certain structural rules which constitute the general scheme of a dialog, a further dialog rule is necessary in order to guarantee a finite game.

Type
Part II. Game Theoretic Semantics for the Language of Science
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1978 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1978 , 1978 , pp. 18 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Hintikka, Jaakko. Logic, Language Games and Information. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.Google Scholar
[2] Jauch, J.M. Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Reading, CA: Addison-Wesley, 1968.Google Scholar
[3] Lorenz, K. “Dialogspiele als Semantische Grundlage von Logikkalkülen.” Archiy für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung 11(1968): 32–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Lorenz, K. “Rules versus Theorems.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 2(1973): 352–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Lorenzen, P. and Lorenz, K. Dialogische Logik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1978.Google Scholar
[6] Mittelstaedt, P. “Time Dependent Propositions and Quantum Logic.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 6(1977): 463–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Mittelstaedt, P. Quantum Logic. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Mittelstaedt, P. and Stachow, E.W. “The Principle of Excluded Middle in Quantum Logic.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 7(1978): 181–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Piron, C. Foundations of Quantum Physics. Reading, CA: W.A. Benjamin, 1976.Google Scholar
[10] Saarinen, Esa. “Dialogue Semantics Versus Game-Theoretical Semantics.” In PSA 1978. Volume 2. Edited by Asquith, P.D. and Hacking, I. East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association, 1981. Pages 41–59.Google Scholar
[11] Stachow, E.W. “The Completeness of Quantum Logic.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 5(1976): 237–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Stachow, E.W. “Quantum Logical Calculi and Lattice Structures.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 7(1978): 347–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar