Skip to main content
Log in

The shattering of meaning. Jan Patočka and his triple concept of history

  • Manuscript
  • Published:
Continental Philosophy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

My paper aims at laying out the main tenets of Patočka’s unusual and highly provocative position with regard to the question of history, drawing essentially on his Heretical Essays on the Philosophy of History, while also gathering insights from other works such as Eternity and Historicity and Europe and post-Europe. In the first part, I set in place the overall framework of this analysis, and show that three distinct, yet entwined concepts of history are operative in Patočka’s work: the understanding of history as a specific regime of meaning, as an existential possibility of the human Dasein, and as a “epochal” dynamic. In the second part, I reconstruct the criticism Patočka mounts against the classical philosophies of history and indicate that his rejection of a teleological account of history is compatible with the attempt of establishing an intrinsic correlation between meaning and history. In the final part, I stress the importance acquired by the experience of the “shattering of meaning” for Patočka’s threefold understanding of history and argue for the possibility of crafting a unitary framework which would encompass his analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Patočka (2002b, pp. 517–587).

  2. Cf. Patočka (2007a, b, c). Commentators have singled out no less than five different projects pertaining to the philosophy of history (sketched between the 1930s and the 1970s). Cf. Karfík (1999, pp. 5–28).

  3. Michalski and Patočka and Michalski (2015, p. 247).

  4. Letter to W. Biemel from July 16, 1975, unpublished. I consulted the manuscript of this letter at the “Jan Patočka Archives” of the Institut für die Wissenschaften vom Menschen in Vienna.

  5. Patočka (1996, p. 27).

  6. Patočka (2011a, p. 39). When the reference is, like here, to a text in a language other than English, the English translation is mine.

  7. Patočka (1996, p. 36).

  8. Patočka (1996, pp. 40–41).

  9. Patočka (2011b, p. 115).

  10. Patočka (1996, p. 23).

  11. Patočka and Michalski (2015, pp. 247–248).

  12. Patočka (1996, p. 29, 63). In both these passages Patočka uses the expression “historical epoch,” by which he does not mean a certain “epoch in history,” but rather that history itself is an epoch.

  13. Patočka (2007d, p. 36).

  14. Patočka (1996, p. 83).

  15. For an account of Patočka’s “being-historical” interpretation of the First World War, see Stanciu (2018, pp. 507–524).

  16. Patočka (1996, p. 27).

  17. See Patočka (2007e, p. 205): “History can be neither regression nor progress, neither beginning nor end of time, neither drama of salvation nor fatality and law, neither tradition nor revolution, in short, nothing achieved, nothing that is a result. But, on the contrary, that which makes results possible in a common world, that which founds continuity and tradition, the assumption of freedom and resistance to that which stands in its way.” While Patočka’s criticism of the “teleological” understanding of history can be equally applied to narratives of progress and narratives of decline, he discusses at greater length the first position, which holds that history displays a progressive trajectory, for he considers it characteristic of the contemporary understanding of history. In what follows, I will mainly focus on the criticism he formulates against this particular conception.

  18. Patočka refers, at various moments in the Heretical Essays, to the doctrines of Hegel and Comte.

  19. Löwith (1949, p. 1).

  20. Patočka (2007d, p. 34).

  21. Patočka (1996, p. 147).

  22. For a criticism of this conception convergent with the one mounted by Patočka, see Löwith (1990, p. 311).

  23. In this regard, see Paparusso (2016, pp. 201–216). See also an earlier text of Patočka where he explicitly rejects the idea of an “end of history”: “From our perspective, however, the realization of man is possible at any time, just as, on the other hand, it seems to us impossible to speak of the end of history in general or of the culmination of the historical process” (Patočka (2011a, p. 145)).

  24. Patočka (2011c, p. 124).

  25. Patočka (1996, p. 140).

  26. For a contemporary reappraisal of the distinction between history and pre-history, see de Beaune and Rémi (2021).

  27. For an analysis of Patočka’s ambiguous stance with regard to the myth, see Gens (2012, pp. 225–238), de Warren (2016, pp. 135–160), Stanciu (2019, pp. 112–128).

  28. As usually understood, Geschichte is used to designate the actual course of events, whereas Historie refers to the knowledge or story of these events. In this respect, see, among others, Ricœur (2000, p. 392); Koselleck 1975; Heidegger (2000, p. 58).

  29. Patočka (2007d, p. 15).

  30. Patočka (1996, pp. 70–71).

  31. Patočka (1996, p. 63).

  32. Patočka (1996, p. 63).

  33. Patočka (1996, pp. 39–40).

  34. Patočka (2002a, b, p.134).

  35. Patočka (1996, p. 40).

  36. Patočka (1996, p. 141).

  37. Patočka (1996, p. 35).

  38. Patočka (1996, p. 15).

  39. Patočka (1996, p. 21).

  40. Patočka (1996, p. 77).

  41. Patočka (2011c, p. 123).

  42. Patočka (1990, p. 281).

  43. Patočka (2007e, p. 194).

References

  • de Beaune, Sophie, and Labrusse Rémi. 2021. La préhistoire au present. Paris: CNRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Warren, Nicholas. 2016. He who saw the deep. The epic of Gilgamesh in Patočka’s philosophy of history. In Thinking after Europe: Jan Patočka and Politics, ed. D. Meacham and F. Tava, 135-160. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

  • Gens, Jean-Claude. 2012. La vérité du mythe. In Jan Patočka. Liberté, existence et monde commun, ed. N. Frogneux, 225-238. Argenteuil: Le Cercle Herméneutique.

  • Heidegger, Martin. 2000. Wissenschaft und Besinnung. In Vorträge und Aufsätze, GA 7. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.

  • Karfík, Filip. 1999. La philosophie de l’histoire et le problème de l’âge technique chez Jan Patočka. Les Études Phénoménologiques 15 (29–30): 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, Reinhardt. 1975. Geschichte. In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, volume 2, ed. W. Conze, O. Brunner and R. Koselleck. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

  • Löwith, Karl. 1949. Meaning in history. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löwith, Karl. 1990. Vom Sinn der Geschichte. In Sämtliche Schriften. Band. 2. Weltgeschichte und Heilsgeschehen. Zur Kritik der Geschichtsphilosophie. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.

  • Paparusso, Riccardo. 2016. The end of history and after: Rethinking kojève and patočka on the idea of post-history. In Thinking after Europe: Jan Patočka and Politics, ed. D. Meacham and F. Tava, 201-214. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patočka, Jan. 1990. Liberté et sacrifice. French trans. E. Abrams. Grenoble: Millon.

  • Patočka, Jan. 1996. Heretical essays in the philosophy of history, ed. James Dodd, Trans. Erazim Kohák. Chicago: Open Court.

  • Patočka, Jan. 2002a. Plato and Europe. Trans. Petr Lom. Standford: Standford Univesity Press.

  • Patočka, Jan. 2002b. Pece o Dusi, III, edited by I. Chvatik and P. Kouba. Prague: Oikoumene.

  • Patočka, Jan. 2007a. Quelques remarques sur les concepts d’histoire et historiographie. In Jan Patočka, L’Europe après l’Europe. French trans. E. Abrams, 139-154. Lagrasse: Verdier.

  • Patočka, Jan. 2007b. Quelques remarques sur le concept d’histoire universelle. In Jan Patočka, L’Europe après l’Europe. French trans. E. Abrams, 155–172. Lagrasse: Verdier.

  • Patocka, Jan. 2007c. Sur la philosophie de l’histoire. In Jan Patočka, L’Europe après l’Europe. French trans. E. Abrams, 173–186. Lagrasse: Verdier.

  • Patočka, Jan. 2007d. Le schéma de l’histoire. In Jan Patočka, L’Europe après l’Europe. French trans. E. Abrams, 13–36. Lagrasse: Verdier.

  • Patočka, Jan. 2007e. Cinq fragments en marge du schéma de l’histoire. In Jan Patočka, L’Europe après l’Europe. French trans. E. Abrams, 193–206. Lagrasse: Verdier.

  • Patočka, Jan. 2011a. Éternité et historicité. French trans. by E. Abrams. Paris: Verdier.

  • Patočka, Jan. 2011b. Cristianesimo e mondo naturale. In Cristianesimo e mondo naturale e altri saggi. Italian trans. R. Papparusso. Rome: Lithos.

  • Patočka, Jan. 2011c. Il problema dell’inizio e del luogo della storia. In Cristianesimo e mondo naturale e altri saggi. Italian trans. R. Papparusso. Rome: Lithos.

  • Patočka, Jan, and Michalski, Krzysztof. 2015. Letters Between Krzysztof Michalski and Jan Patočka (1973–1976), edited by Nicolas de Warren, translated by Nicolas de Warren, Patrick Eldridge, and Vera Tylzanowski. In The New Yearbook for phenomenology and phenomenological philosophy XIV – 2015.

  • Ricœur, Paul. 2000. La mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanciu, Ovidiu, El mito como apertura al mundo. Sobre un equívoco en el pensamiento de Patočka. In Aporía. Revista Internacional de Investigaciones Filosóficas, 3/ 2019, 112–128.

  • Stanciu, Ovidiu. 2018. La Grande Guerre comme “événement cosmique”. Jan Patocka et l’expérience du front. In Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger, 4/2018, pp. 507–524.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by a grant of the Ministry of Research and Innovation, CNCS-UEFISCDI, project number: PN-III-P1-1.1-TE-2016-2224, within PNCDI III.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ovidiu Stanciu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stanciu, O. The shattering of meaning. Jan Patočka and his triple concept of history. Cont Philos Rev 55, 177–192 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-021-09557-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-021-09557-6

Keywords

Navigation