Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Corporations, Stakeholders and Sustainable Development I: A Theoretical Exploration of Business–Society Relations

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sustainable development (SD) – that is, “Development that meets the needs of current generations without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs and aspirations” – can be pursued in many different ways. Stakeholder relations management (SRM) is one such way, through which corporations are confronted with economic, social, and environmental stakeholder claims. This paper lays the groundwork for an empirical analysis of the question of how far SD can be achieved through SRM. It describes the so-called SD–SRM perspective as a distinctive research approach and shows how it relates to the wider body of stakeholder theory. Next, the concept of SD is operationalized for the microeconomic level with reference to important documents. Based on the ensuing SD framework, it is shown how SD and SRM relate to each other, and how the two concepts relate to other popular concepts such as Corporate Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility. The paper concludes that the significance of societal guiding models such as SD and of management approaches like CSR is strongly dependent on their footing in society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J. Andriof S. Waddock (2002) Unfolding Stakeholder Engagement J. Andriof S. Waddock B. Husted S. Sutherland Rahman (Eds) Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking 1: Theory, Responsibility and Engagement Greenleaf Publishing Sheffield 19–42

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Andriof S. Waddock B. Husted S. Sutherland Rahman (2002) Introduction J. Andriof S. Waddock B. Husted S. Sutherland Rahman (Eds) Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking 1: Theory, Responsibility and Engagement Greenleaf Publishing Sheffield 9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Argandona (1998) ArticleTitleThe Stakeholder Theory and the Common Good Journal of Business Ethics 17 1093–1102 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006075517423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S. B.: 2002, ‘Contesting Corporate Citizenship, Sustainability and Stakeholder Theory: Holy Trinity or Praxis of Evil?’, http:/business.unisa.edu/au/cae/TBL/tbldownloadables/banerjeecorporateresponsibility.pdf.

  • W. Beckerman (1995) Small is Stupid: Blowing the Whistle on the Greens Duchworth London

    Google Scholar 

  • S. L. Berman A. C. Wicks S. Kotha T. M. Jones (1999) ArticleTitleDoes Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance Academy of Management Journal 42 IssueID5 488–506

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Birnbacher C. Schicha (1996) Vorsorge statt Nachhaltigkeit – Ethische Grundlagen der Zukunftsverantwortung H. G. Kastenholz K. H. Erdmann M. Wolff (Eds) Nachhaltige Entwicklung: Zukunftschancen für Mensch und Umwelt Springer Berlin 141–156

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Boele H. Fabig D. Wheeler (2001) ArticleTitleShell, Nigeria and the Ogoni. A Study in Unsustainable Development: II. Corporate Social Responsibility and ‘Stakeholder Management’ versus a Rights-Based Approach to Sustainable Development Sustainable Development 9 121–135 Occurrence Handle10.1002/sd.168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Bonn C. Christodoulou (1996) ArticleTitleFrom Strategic Planning to Strategic Management Long Range Planning 29 IssueID4 543–551 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0024-6301(96)00046-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. R. Bowen (1953) Social Responsibilities of the Businessman New York University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • A. B. Carroll (1993) Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management South-Western Publishing Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • A. B. Carroll (1999) ArticleTitleCorporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct Business & Society 38 IssueID3 268–295

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Céspedes-Lorente J. Burgos-Jiménez Particlede M. J. Álvarez-Gil (2003) ArticleTitleStakeholders’ Environmental Influence An Empirical Analysis in the Spanish Hotel Industry Scandinavian Journal of Management 19 333–358 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0956-5221(02)00034-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Clark (1939) Social Control of Business McGraw-Hill New York

    Google Scholar 

  • M. B. E. Clarkson (1998) A Stakeholder Framework for Analysing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance M. B. E. Clarkson (Eds) The Corporation and its Stakeholders: Classic and Contemporary Readings University of Toronto Press Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Collins (2001) Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap ... and Others Don’t HarperCollins New York

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Cragg A. Greenbaum (2002) ArticleTitleReasoning about Responsibilities Mining Company Managers on What Stakeholders are Owed Journal of Business Ethics 39 319–335 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1016523113429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Cragg (2002) ArticleTitleBusiness Ethics and Stakeholder Theory Business Ethics Quarterly 12 IssueID2 113–142

    Google Scholar 

  • H. E. Daly (1996) Beyond Growth The Economics of Sustainable Development Beacon Press Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Dawkins S. Lewis (2003) ArticleTitleCSR in Stakeholder Expectations and their Implication for Company Strategy Journal of Business Ethics 44 IssueID2–3 185–193 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1023399732720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. R. Dill (1958) ArticleTitleEnvironment as an Influence on Managerial Autonomy Administrative Science Quarterly 2 409–443

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Donaldson L. E. Preston (1995) ArticleTitleThe Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications Academy of Management Review 20 65–91

    Google Scholar 

  • P. F. Drucker (1984) ArticleTitleThe New Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility California Management Review 26 53–63

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Dyllick K. Hockerts (2002) ArticleTitleBeyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability Business Strategy and the Environment 11 130–141 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bse.323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission: 2001, Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. Green Paper . (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg)http://europe. eu.int/comm/employment_social/soc-dial/csr/csr2002_en.pdf.

  • European Commission: 2002, ‘Communication from the Commission concerning Corporate Social Responsibility: A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development’, http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_ social/soc-dial/csr/csr2002_en.pdf.

  • Figge, F. and S. Schaltegger: 2000, ‘What is ‘Stakeholder Value? Developing a catchphrase into a Benchmarking Tool’, http://www.sustainablevalue.com/Stakeholder %20Value%20%20Frank%20Figge%20and%20Stefan% 20Schaltegger%20(read%20only).pdf.

  • R. E. Freeman (1984) Strategic Management A Stakeholder Approach Pitman Bosten

    Google Scholar 

  • R. E. Freeman (1997) Stakeholder Theory P. H. Werhane R. E. Freeman (Eds) Blackwell Encyclopedia of Business Ethics Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • R. E. Freeman (1999) ArticleTitleDivergent Stakeholder Theory Academy of Management Review 24 IssueID2 233–236

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Frooman (1999) ArticleTitleStakeholder Influence Strategies Academy of Management Review 24 IssueID2 191–205

    Google Scholar 

  • K. E. Goodpaster (1991) ArticleTitleBusiness Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis Business Ethics Quarterly 1 IssueID1 53–73

    Google Scholar 

  • A. O. Green L. Hunton-Clarke (2003) ArticleTitleA Typology of Stakeholder Participation for Company Environmental Decision-Making Business Strategy and the Environment 12 292–299 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bse.371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GRI: 2002, ‘Sustainability Reporting Guidelines’, http://www.globalreporting.org/guidelines/2002/gri_2002_ guidelines.pdf.

  • Hameskerk, B., P. Pistorio and M. Scicluna: 2003, ‘Sustainable Development Reporting: Striking the balance’ (WBCSD), http://www.wbcsd.org/newscenter/reports/2003/20030106_sdreport.pdf.

  • Hardi, P. and T. Zdan: 1997, Assessing Sustainable Development Principles in Practice, The Bellagio Principles for Assessment. (International Institute for Sustainable Development/IISD, Winnipeg)http://www.iisd.org/pdf/bellagio.pdf.

  • J. S. Harrison R. E. Freeman (1999) ArticleTitleStakeholders, Social Responsibility, and Performance Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Perspectives Academy of Management Journal 42 IssueID5 479–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Heald, M.: 1957, Management’s responsibility to society: The growth of an idea.

  • P. P. M. A. R. Heugens F. A. J. Bosch ParticleVan Den C. B. M. Riel ParticleVan (2002) ArticleTitleStakeholder Integration: Building Mutually Enforcing Relationships Business & Society 41 IssueID1 36–60

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hill (2001) ArticleTitleThinking about a more Sustainable Business – an Indicators Approach Corporate Environmental Strategy 8 IssueID1 30–38 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1066-7938(00)00097-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holme, R. and P. Watts: 2000, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Making Good Business Sense’ (WBCS), http://www.wbcsd.org/newscenter/reports /2000/csr2000.pdf.

  • R. Hueting L. Reijnders (1998) ArticleTitleSustainability is an Objective Concept Ecological Economics 27 IssueID2 139–147 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00033-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Humber (2002) ArticleTitleBeyond Stockholders and Stakeholders A Plea for Corporate Moral Autonomy Journal of Business Ethics 36 207–221 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1014061326967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. E. Hund J. A. Engel-Cox (2002) Two-way Responsibility: The Role of Industry and its Stakeholders in Working towards Sustainable Development’ S. Sutherland Rahman S. Waddock J. Andriof B. Husted (Eds) Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking: Theory Responsibility and Engagement Greenleaf Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Huse V. P. Rindova (2001) ArticleTitleStakeholders’ Expectations of Board Roles: The Case of Subsidiary Boards Journal of Management and Governance 5 153–178 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1013017909067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. W. Husted (2001) ArticleTitleEthics as Politics: Federal Ethics as the Basis for a ‘Normative’ Stakeholder Theory International Journal of Value-Based Management 14 183–201 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1011107528012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IISD Deloitte & Touche, WBCSD: 1992, ‘Business Strategy for Sustainable Development’, http://www. bsdglobal.com/pdf/business_strategy.pdf.

  • ISO Advisory Group on Social Responsibility: 2004, ‘Working Report on Social Responsibility’, www. iso.org/iso/en/info/Conferences/SRConferences/pdf /Working%20Report%20SR(Apr30).pdf.

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameIUCN (1980) World Conservation Strategy: Living Resources Conservation for Sustainable Development IUCN Gland/Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • T. M. Jones A. C. Wicks (1999) ArticleTitleConvergent Stakeholder Theory Academy of Management Review 24 IssueID2 206–221

    Google Scholar 

  • T. M. Jones (1995) ArticleTitleInstrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics Academy of Management Review 20 IssueID2 404–437

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Kaler (2003) ArticleTitleDifferentiating Stakeholder Theories Journal of Business Ethics 46 71–83 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1024794710899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Kirchgässner (1997) ArticleTitleNachhaltigkeit in der Umweltnutzung: Einige Bemerkungen’ Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik & Umweltrecht 1 IssueID97 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, A., R. Steurer, and M. E. Langer: 2006, ‘Corporations, Stakeholders and Sustainable Development II: Empirical Findings on Business–Society Relations’, Journal of Business Ethics forthcoming.

  • Langer, M. E. and A. Schön: 2002, Evaluation of sustainable development. Final Report: Sustainable development and the evaluation process at the regional/local level – S.D.-EVA-Pro (Vienna University of Economics Vienna).

  • M. Marrewijk Particlevan (2003) ArticleTitleConcepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: between Agency and Communion Journal of Business Ethics 44 IssueID2 95–105 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1023331212247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Martinuzzi R. Steurer (2003) ArticleTitleThe Austrian Strategy for Sustainable Development: Process Review and Policy Analysis European Environment 13 IssueID4 269–287 Occurrence Handle10.1002/eet.326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. McWilliams D. Siegel (2001) ArticleTitleCorporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective Academy of Management Review 26 IssueID1 117–127

    Google Scholar 

  • D. H. Meadows D. L. Meadows et al. (1972) The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind Associates-Universe Books New York

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Mellahi G. Wood (2003) ArticleTitleThe Role and Potential of Stakeholders in ‘Hollow Participation’: Conventional Stakeholder Theory and Institutional Alternatives Business and Society Review 108 IssueID2 183–202 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8594.00160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Mintzberg (1994) The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning: Reconceiving Roles for Planning, Plans, Planners The Free Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R. K. Mitchell B. R. Agle D. J. Wood (1998) Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and what Really Counts M. B. E. Clarkson (Eds) The Corporation and its Stakeholders: Classic and Contemporary Readings University of Toronto Press Toronto 275–313

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Neumayer (1999) Weak versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms Edward Elgar Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD: 2001, Strategies for Sustainable Development: Practical Guidance for Development Cooperation. (OECD, Paris)http://www.nssd.net/pdf/gsuse.pdf. .

  • A. G. Oliver (2001) ArticleTitleCan Sustainable Development and the Market Co-exist? Corporate Environmental Strategy 8 IssueID1 24–29 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1066-7938(00)00086-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Pearce (1991) Introduction D. Pearce (Eds) Blueprint 2: Greening the World Economy Earthscan London 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • R. A. Phillips J. Reichart (2000) ArticleTitleThe Environment as a Stakeholder? A Fairness-based Approach Journal of Business Ethics 23 185–197 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006041929249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. K. Rao (2000) Sustainable Development: Economics and Policy Malden Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Reid (1995) Sustainable Development: An Introductory Guide Earthscan London

    Google Scholar 

  • D. A. Rondinelli M. A. Berry (2000) ArticleTitleEnvironmental Citizenship in Multinational Corporations: Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development European Management Journal 18 IssueID1 70–84 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00070-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. J. Rowley (1997) ArticleTitleMoving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences Academy of Management Review 22 IssueID4 887–910

    Google Scholar 

  • B. M. Ruf K. Muralidhar et al. (2001) ArticleTitleAn Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective Journal of Business Ethics 32 143–156 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1010786912118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Sachs (1993/1994) Globale Umweltpolitik im Schatten des Entwicklungsdenkens W. Sachs (Eds) Der Planet als Patient: Über die Widersprüche globaler Umweltpolitik Birkhäuser Berlin 15–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S. and A. Sturm: 1992/2000, ‘Ökologieorientierte Entscheidungen in Unternehmungen: Ökologisches Rechnungswesen statt Ökobilanzierung: Notwendigkeit, Kriterien, Konzepte’, http://www. uni-lueneburg.de/umanagement/pdf-dateien/Schalte- gger-Sturm.pdf.

  • A. Sen (1999) Development as Freedom Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • N. A. Shankman (1999) ArticleTitleReframing the Debate Between Agency and Stakeholder Theories of the Firm Journal of Business Ethics 19 319–334 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005880031427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Sillanpää D. Wheeler (1997) Integrated Ethical Auditing: The Body Shop International, UK S. Zadek P. Pruzan R. Evans (Eds) Building Corporate AccountAbility. Emerging Practices in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting Earthscan London 102–127

    Google Scholar 

  • R. J. Smith (1996) ArticleTitleSustainability and the Rationalisation of the Environment Environmental Politics 5 IssueID1 25–47

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Snider R. P. Hill D. Martin (2003) ArticleTitleCorporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century: A View from the World’s Most Successful Firms Journal of Business Ethics 48 175–187 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:BUSI.0000004606.29523.db

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Starik (1995) ArticleTitleShould Trees Have Managerial Standing? Toward Stakeholder Status for Non-Human Nature Journal of Business Ethics 14 207–217 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00881435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. G. Stead E. Stead (2000) ArticleTitleEco-Enterprise Strategy: Standing for Sustainability Journal of Business Ethics 24 313–329 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006188725928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Steurer (2001) ArticleTitleParadigmen der Nachhaltigkeit Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht 4 537–566

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Steurer (2002) Der Wachstumsdiskurs in Wissenschaft und Politik: Von der Wachstumseuphorie über ‘Grenzen des Wachstums’ zur Nachhaltigkeit Verlag für Wissenschaft und Forschung Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Steurer, R.: 2005, ‘Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From the ‘Stakeholder Theory of the Firm’ to Three Perspectives on Business–Society Relations’, Business Strategy and the Environment, forthcoming.

  • S. Sutherland Rahman S. Waddock (2003) Introduction J. Andriof S. Waddock B. Husted S. Sutherland Rahman (Eds) Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking 2: Relationships, Communication, Reporting and Performance Greenleaf Publishing Sheffield 9–12

    Google Scholar 

  • D. J. Swanson (1999) ArticleTitleToward an Integrative Theory of Business and Society: A Research Strategy for Corporate Social Performance Academy of Management Review 24 IssueID3 506–521

    Google Scholar 

  • L. K. Trevino G. R. Weaver (1999) ArticleTitleThe Stakeholder Research Tradition: Converging Theorists – Not Convergent Theory Academy of Management Review 24 IssueID2 222–227

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCED: 1992, Agenda 21, New York, http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/agenda21.htm.

  • UNCED: 1992, ‘Rio Declaration on Environment and Development’, http://www.unep.org/Documents/Default.asp?DocumentID=78&ArticleID=1163.

  • United Nations Department for Economic and Social Affairs: 2001, ‘Guidance in Preparing National Sustainable Development Strategies: What are National Sustainable Development Strategies?/Revised Draft’, http://www.johannesburgsummit.org/web_pages/nsds_guidance_final_ghana.pdf.

  • C. C. Walton (1967) Corporate Social Responsibilities Wadsworth Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameWCED (1987) Our Common Future Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • J. W. Weiss (1994) Business Ethics: A Managerial Stakeholder Approach Wadsworth Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Wheeler et al. (2002) ArticleTitleParadoxes and Dilemmas for Stakeholder Responsive Firms in the Extractive Sector: Lessons from the Case of Shell and the Ogoni Journal of Business Ethics 39 297–318 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1016542207069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. M. Wijnberg (2000) ArticleTitleNormative Stakeholder Theory and Aristotle: The Link between Ethics and Politics Journal of Business Ethics 25 329–342 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006086226794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. J. Wood R. E. Jones (1995) ArticleTitleStakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Responsibility The International Journal of Organizational Analysis 3 IssueID3 229–267

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank: 2002, ‘Sustainable Development in a Dynamic World: World Development Report 2003. Overview’ (The World Bank, Washington), http://econ.worldbank.org/wdr/wdr2003/text-17926/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Managing Sustainability Research Centre, Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, Nordbergstr. 15, Kern D, 5. Stock, 1090, Vienna, Austria

    Reinhard Steurer, Markus E. Langer, Astrid Konrad & André Martinuzzi

Authors
  1. Reinhard Steurer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Markus E. Langer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Astrid Konrad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. André Martinuzzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reinhard Steurer.

Additional information

Reinhard Steurer is a senior researcher and lecturer at the Research Institute for Managing Sustainability at the Vienna University of Economics and Business Adminstration. His research focuses on the changing roles of states, businesses and civil societies in the context of sustainable development. He is author and co-author of numerous articles, dealing with questions of how governments and businesses tackle the challenge of sustainable development, and what the two societal domains can learn from each other in doing so. He holds a Ph.D. in Political Science from the University of Salzburg/Austria, and a Masters in Public Policy from the University of Maryland/U.S.A.

Markus E. Langer studied ecology and environmental economics at the University of Vienna and the Vienna University of Economics and Business Adminstration as well as industrial environmental management at Yale University. He is currently working as Managing Director of FORUM Umweltbildung. Previously he was working since 1999 as a senior researcher and lecturer at the Research Institute for Managing Sustainability at the Vienna University of Economics and Business Adminstration. His research focused on the Evaluation of Sustainable Development as well as Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Management.

Astrid Konrad studied business administration at the University of Graz. She has been working at the Research Institute for Managing Sustainability at the Vienna University of Economics and Business Adminstration since 2002. Her research focus is on Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Management.

André Martinuzzi studied business adminstration at the Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration. He is working as a project manager at the Department of Environmental Economics and Management since 1993, as a lecturer at the Vienna University of Economics and Business Adminstration and leads the Managing Sustainability Research Centre since 1999. Since 2001 he worked as a scientific coordinator of Austria’s Sustainability Strategy. In 2003 he worked as a scientific editor of the Corporate Social Responsibility vision statement of the Austrian Industry and as a process consultant for the Austrian Forest Program. Research areas: Eco-Consulting, Corporate Sustainability, Evaluating Sustainable Development, Sustainability Strategies and Stakeholder Dialogues.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steurer, R., Langer, M.E., Konrad, A. et al. Corporations, Stakeholders and Sustainable Development I: A Theoretical Exploration of Business–Society Relations. J Bus Ethics 61, 263–281 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-7054-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-7054-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation