Skip to main content
Log in

Can social awareness be increased through business school curricula?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study was prompted by (a) Frederick and Vogel's debate concerning future research in “business and society”, (b) such recently reported managerial excesses as golden parachutes, “greenmail”, and fraud, (c) the increasing emphasis on coursework in the area. It appears that there is a need to assess how students, our future business leaders, perceive social issues and if a “business and society” course can help them define and understand the importance of these issues.

Three questions provided the focal point: (1) Which issues do students perceive as most important before and after completing the course? (2) How much importance do students place on issues? (3) Does completing a “business and society” course make a significant difference in how students perceive the importance of the issues presented?

Students appeared to have already clearly defined priorities before entering the course as there was very little post-course reordering of priorities. However, they did display an increased perception of the importance of social issues. The study also indicated that a “business and society” course can contribute to an increased student awareness of the importance of social issues. Therefore, it was concluded that a “business and society” course can help students define and evaluate the importance of social issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baig, E. C.: 1987, ‘America's Most Admired Corporations’, Fortune 115, 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Business Bulletin: Business Undergrads ...’, The Wall Street Journal (September 4, 1986), 1.

  • Byrne, J. A. and Beam, A.: 1987, ‘Harvard's $30 Million Windfall for Ethics 101’, Business Week (April 13), 40.

  • ‘Charles on Uses of Science’, The New York Times (September 5, 1986), 14.

  • Conlin, K.: 1986, ‘Business Schools with a Conscience’, The New York Times (August 24), E7.

  • ‘Facts’, College of Business Administration, University of Houston (1986).

  • ‘IV Curriculum’, Accreditation Council Policies and Standards (1985–1986), 29.

  • Forsythe, L. M., Highsmith, J. M., and Lange, P. M.: 1983, ‘Teaching Business and Society Courses in Schools of Business’, presented at the Fourth Annual Conference on Teaching Business and Society, Berkeley (May 5–6).

  • Frederick, W. C.: 1986, ‘Commentary on Vogel’, in ‘A Debate on the Future of Research in Business and Society’, California Management Review 28, 152–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, L. T.: 1985, ‘The Other 338: Why a Majority of Our Schools of Business Administration Do Not Offer a Course in Business Ethics’, Journal of Business 4, 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Labor Letter: Ethics Training Gets a Boost at Many Companies’, The Wall Street Journal (September 9, 1986), 1.

  • Lewin, T.: 1986, ‘Young, Eager, and Indicted’, The New York Times (June 2), 25.

  • New Ph.D. Field to Bolster Business and Environment Area; Stanford Business School Magazine (Fall 1986), 5.

  • Palmer, R. E.: 1986, ‘Let's Be Bullish on Ethics’, The New York Times (June 20), 23.

  • ‘Prince Charles Stresses “Standards to Live By”’, The Houston Post (September 5, 1986), 2A.

  • Richter, P.: ‘Big Business Puts Ethics in Spotlight’, Los Angeles Times (June 19, 1986), 1.

  • Scott, W. G. and Mitchell, T. R.: 1985, ‘The Moral Failure of Management Education’, The Chronicle of Higher Education (December 11, 1985), 35.

  • Simpson, J. E.: ‘Here's the Newest Top Ten: Companies with a Conscience’, The Wall Street Journal (March 4, 1987), 24.

  • Stanton, E. S.: 1986, ‘Morality and Integrity Aren't Yuppie Traits’, Business Week (September 15), 12.

  • Starling, G.: 1984, The Changing Environment of Business, Second Edition (Kent Publishing Company, Boston).

  • Sturdivant, F. D.: 1985, Business and Society, Third Edition (Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, Illinois).

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Taking Corporate Crime to Court’, Insight (September 15, 1986), 52–53.

  • Vogel, D.: 1986, ‘Commentary on Frederick’, in ‘A Debate on the Future of Research in Business and Society’, California Management Review 28, 154–155.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Bette Ann Stead is Professor of Marketing in the College of Business Administration at the University of Houston. She edited Women in Management, Second Edition, published by Prentice-Hall Inc., in 1985. She authored ‘Corporate Giving: A Look at the Arts’, which appeared in the Journal of Business Ethics (Spring 1985) and co-authored ‘Women's Adoption of a Business Uniform: A Content Analysis of Magazine Advertisements’, which appeared in Sex Roles (August 1986).

Janice J. Miller is Assistant Professor in the College of Business Administration, University of Houston. Dr. Miller has co-authored two international business books and has lectured on the area of business and society issues in Europe and the Far East. She has taught at the University of Iowa and University of Texas at Dallas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stead, B.A., Miller, J.J. Can social awareness be increased through business school curricula?. J Bus Ethics 7, 553–560 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382603

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382603

Keywords

Navigation