Abstract
Classification in eighteenth-century natural history was marked by a battle of systems. The Linnaean approach to classification was severely criticized by those naturalists who aspired to a truly natural system. But how to make oneself nature's spokesman? In this article I seek to answer that question using the approach of the French anthropologist of science Bruno Latour in a discussion of the work of the French naturalists Buffon and Cuvier in the eighteenth and early nineteenth century. These naturalists followed very different strategies in creating and defending of what they believed to be a natural classification in zoology. Buffon failed, whereas Cuvier's work appeared to be very successful. My argument will be that, to explain Buffon's failure and Cuvier's success, we should not focus on the epistemological or theoretical concerns and justifications of these naturalists, but on the concrete and heterogeneous means or tools through which animals were mobilized, stabilized and combined into ever more comprehensive systems of classification.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appel, T.A.: 1987,The Cuvier-Geoffroy Debate. French Biology in the Decades before Darwin, New York, Oxford University Press.
Balan, B.: 1979,L'ordre et le temps: l'anatomie comparée et l'histoire des vivants au XIXe siècle, Paris, Vrin.
Bertin, L. (et al.): 1952,Buffon (Les Grands Naturalistes Français), Paris, Le Musée National d'Histoire Naturelle.
Buffon, G.L. Lecclerc de (et al.): 1749–1789,Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière, avec la description du Cabnet du roi, Paris, Imprimerie Royale, 31 volumes.
Coleman, W.: 1964,Georges Cuvier, Zoologist: A Study in the History of Evolution Theory, Cambridge Mass., Harvard University Press.
Corsi, P.: 1982, ‘Models and Analogies for the Reform of Natural History. Features of the French Debate 1790–1800’, in W. Bernardi, A. La Vergata (eds.),Lazzaro Spallanzani e la Biologia del Settecento. Teorie, Esperimenti, Istituzioni Scientifiche, Florence, Olschki, 381–396.
Corsi, P.: 1988,The Age of Lamarck. Evolutionary Theories in France 1790–1830, Berkeley, University of California Press.
Cross, S.: 1981, ‘John Hunter, the Animal Economy, and Late Eighteenth Century Physiological Discourse’,Studies in History of Biology 5, 1–110.
Cuvier, G.: 1795, ‘Mémoire sur la structure interne et externe, et sur les affinités des animaux auxquels on a donné le nom de Vers’,Décade philosophique 5, 385–396.
Cuvier, G.: 1800–1805,Leçons d'anatomie comparée, C. Duméril (ed.) Vols. I–II (1800), G.L. Duvernoy (ed.) Vols. III–V (1805), Paris, Baudouin.
Cuvier, G.: 1817,Le règne animal distribué d'après son organisation pour servir de base à l'histoire naturelle des animaux et d'introduction à l'anatomie comparée, Paris, Déterville, 4 volumes.
Cuvier, G.: 1858,Lettres de Georges Cuvier à C.H. Pfaff. 1788–1792, sur l'histoire naturelle, la politique, et la littérature. Traduites de l'allemand par Louis, Marchant, Paris, Masson.
Daudin, H.: 1926a,De Linné à Jussieu. Les méthodes de la classification et l'idée de série du Botanique et du Zoologie (1740–1790), Paris, Alcan.
Daudin, H.: 1926b,Cuvier et Lamarck. Les classes zoologiques et l'idée de série animale (1790–1830), Paris, Alcan.
Dechambre, Ed.: 1952, ‘L'article des chiens dans l'Histoire Naturelle’, in L. Bertin (et al.), 157–166.
Eriksson, G.: 1983, ‘Linnaeus the Botanist’, in T. Frängsmyr (ed.),Linnaeus: The Man and his Work, Berkeley, University of California Press, 63–109.
Farber, P.L.: 1972, ‘Buffon and the Concept of Species’,Journal of the History of Biology 5, 259–284.
Farber, P.L.: 1975, ‘Buffon and Daubenton: Divergent Traditions within the Histoire Naturelle’,Isis 66, 63–74.
Farber, P.L.: 1982,The Emergence of Ornithology as a Scientific Discipline: 1760–1850, Dordrecht, Reidel.
Figlio, K.M.: 1976, ‘The Metaphor of Organization: An Historiographical Perspective on the Bio-Medical Sciences of the Early Nineteenth Century’,History of Science 14, 17–53.
Flourens, P.: 1856–1857,Recueil des Eloges Historiques. Lus dans les séances publiques de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris, Garnier Frères, 2 volumes.
Foucault, M., 1970,The Order of Things. An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, London, Tavistock Publications.
Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, E., G. Cuvier: 1975, ‘Mémoire sur une nouvelle division des mammifères et sur les principes qui doivent servir de base dans cette sorte de travail’,Magasin Encyclopédique 2, 164–190.
Golinski, J.V.: 1986, ‘Science in the Enlightenment’,History of Science 24, 411–424.
Holmes, F.L.: 1977, ‘Conceptual History. A Review of François Jacob, The Logic of Life, a History of Heredity’,Studies in History of Biology 1, 209–218.
Jordanova, L.J.: 1982, ‘Towards the Light? Science, Politics and the Enlightenment’,European Studies Review 12, 479–488.
Larson, J.L.: 1971,Reason and Experience: The Representation of Natural Order in the Work of Carl von Linné, Berkeley, University of California Press.
Latour, B.: 1986, ‘Visualization and Cognition: Thinking with Eyes and Hands’,Knowledge and Society 6, 1–40.
Latour, B.: 1987,Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Milton Keynes, Open University Press; and Cambridge Mass., Harvard University Press.
Latour, B.: 1992, ‘One More Turn after the Social Turn: Easing Science Studies into the Non-modern World’. In: E. MacMullin (ed.),The Social Dimensions of Science, Notre Dame Ind., University of Notre Dame Press.
Lenoir, T.: 1981, ‘The Göttingen School and the Development of Transcendental Naturphilosophie in the Romantic Era’,Studies in History of Biology 5, 111–205.
Lenoir, T.: 1982,The Strategy of Life. Teleology and Mechanics in Nineteenth-Century German Biology, Dordrecht, Reidel.
Lyon, J., P.R. Sloan (eds.): 1981,From Natural History to the History of Nature: Readings from Buffon and his Critics, Notre Dame Ind., University of Notre Dame Press.
Outram, D.: 1984,Georges Cuvier: Vocation, Science and Authority in Post-Revolutionary France, Manchester, Manchester University Press.
Outram, D.: 1986, ‘Uncertain Legislator: George Cuvier's Laws of Nature in their Intellectual Context’,Journal of History of Biology 19, 323–368.
Roger, J.: 1963,Les Sciences de la Vie dans la Pensée Française du XVIIIe Siècle: La Génération des Animaux de Descartes à l'Encycopédie, Paris, Colin.
Roger, J.: 1980, ‘The Living World’, in G.R. Rousseau and R. Porter (eds.),The Ferment of Knowledge: Studies in the historiography of eighteenth-century science, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 255–283.
Roger, J.: 1989,Buffon. Un philosophe au Jarin du Roi, Paris, Fayard.
Secord, J.A.: 1985, ‘Natural History in Depth’,Social Studies of Science 15, 181–200.
Sloan, P.R.: 1972, ‘John Locke, John Ray and the Problem of the Natural System’,Journal of the History of Biology 5, 1–53.
Sloan, P.R.: 1976, ‘The Buffon-Linnaeus Controversy’,Isis 67, 356–375.
Sloan, P.R.: 1979, ‘Buffon, German Biology, and the Historical Interpretation of Biological Species’,British Journal of the History of Science 12, 109–153.
Stafleu, F.A.: 1963, ‘Adanson and his “Familles des Plantes”, in G.H.M. Lawrence (ed.),Adanson: the bicentennial of Michel Adanson's Famille des Plantes, Pittsburgh, Carnegie Institute of Technology Monograph Series, No. 1, 123–264.
Stafleu, F.A.: 1971,Linnaeus and the Linnaeans. The Spreading of their Ideas in Systematic Botany, 1735–1789, Utrecht, Oosthoek.
Stemerding, D.: 1991,Plants, Animals and Formulae. Natural History in the Light of Latour's Science in Action and Foucault's The Order of Things, Dissertation, University of Twente, TW/RC-310, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.
Theunissen, B.: 1986, ‘The Relevance of Cuvier'slois zoologiques for his Palaeontological Work’,Annals of Science 43, 543–556.
Wohl, R.: 1960, ‘Buffon and his Project for a New Science’,Isis 51, 186–199.
Wood, P.B.: 1987, ‘Buffon's reception in Scotland: The Aberdeen connection’,Annals of Science 44, 169–190.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stemerding, D. How to make oneself nature's spokesman? A latourian account of classification in eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century natural history. Biol Philos 8, 193–223 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00850482
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00850482