Philosophy and the Precautionary Principle

Front Cover
Cambridge University Press, 2015 - Business & Economics - 256 pages
Scholars in philosophy, law, economics and other fields have widely debated how science, environmental precaution, and economic interests should be balanced in urgent contemporary problems, such as climate change. One controversial focus of these discussions is the precautionary principle, according to which scientific uncertainty should not be a reason for delay in the face of serious threats to the environment or health. While the precautionary principle has been very influential, no generally accepted definition of it exists and critics charge that it is incoherent or hopelessly vague. This book presents and defends an interpretation of the precautionary principle from the perspective of philosophy of science, looking particularly at how it connects to decisions, scientific procedures, and evidence. Through careful analysis of numerous case studies, it shows how this interpretation leads to important insights on scientific uncertainty, intergenerational justice, and the relationship between values and policy-relevant science.
 

Contents

The precaution controversy
1
Answering the dilemma objection
17
The unity of the precautionary principle
44
The historical argument for precaution
69
Scientific uncertainty
95
Counting the future
120
Precautionary science and the valuefree ideal
144
Values precaution and uncertainty factors
171
Concluding case studies
199
Appendix
218
References
234
Index
254
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2015)

Daniel Steel is Associate Professor in the Department of Philosophy at Michigan State University. He is the author of Across the Boundaries: Extrapolation in Biology and Social Science (2008) and the co-editor (with Francesco Guala) of The Philosophy of Social Science Reader (2011).