Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing Freeman’s Stakeholder Theory

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At least since the publication of the monumental Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (1984), the “stakeholder theory” originated by R. E. Freeman has engrossed much of the business ethics literature. Subsequently, some advocates have moved a bit too quickly and without proper definition or argument. They have exceeded Freeman’s intentions which are more libertarian and free-market than is often thought. This essay focuses on the versions of stakeholder theory directly authored or coauthored by Freeman in an effort to recover (1) Freeman’s intentions and (2) the argumentative justification of stakeholder theory. It then argues that Freeman’s appeal to legal, economic, and ethical constraints ultimately produce arguments that are invalid. One can thoroughly support legislation constraining corporations or seeking to prevent age discrimination, market monopolies, and externalities and regret the extent that capitalism is heir to such shortcomings without it following that (1) business beneficiaries should be changed from stockholders to stakeholders and (2) the latter should be given serious decision-making power. Further, stakeholder theory neither defines nor battles any obvious opposition. Hence, it is difficult to see what it changes about business management. In short, stakeholder theory either changes too much about business, or nothing important at all (depending on one’s interpretation). Efforts to supplant or improve the reigning theory of capitalism will have to do better.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aristotle: 1985, Nichomachean Ethics, trans T. Irwin (Hackett, Indianapolis, IN)

  • Beauchamp, T., & Bowie, N. 2004, Ethical Theory and Business Seventh Edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A., & Means, G. 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Commerce Clearing House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrol, A.B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295. doi:10.1177/000765039903800303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesher, J. E. and T. Machan: 1999, The Business of Commerce: Examining an Honorable Profession (Hoover Institution Press, Stanford, CA)

  • Conover, C. J.: 2004, ‹Health Care Regulation: A $169 Billion Hidden Tax’, Policy Analysis no. 527. The Cato Institute. http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=2466. Accessed 30 July 2008

  • Corporate Scandals: 2005, NOW website. Public Broadcasting Station. http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/corpscandalupdates.html Accessed 30 July 2008.

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 1(20), 65–91. doi:10.2307/258887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and P. Werhane (eds.): 2008, Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, 8th Edition (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)

  • Donaldson, T., P. Werhane and M. Cording (eds.): 2002, Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, 7th Edition (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)

  • Dunham L., R. E. Freeman and J. Leidtka: 2006, ‹Enhancing Stakeholder Practice: A Particularized Exploration of Community’ Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(1), 23–42. .

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E. 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pittman, Marshfield, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 2002, ‹Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation’, in T. Donaldson and P. Werhane (eds.),␣Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, 7th Edition (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), pp.␣38–48

  • Freeman, R.E. 2008, “Managing for Stakeholders”. In: T. Donaldson, P. Werhane (eds), Ethical Issues in Business; A Philosophical Approach, 8th edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J.S., & Wicks, A.C. 2007, Managing for Stakeholders; Survival Reputation and Success. Yale U. Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E., & Philips, R. (2002). Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 3(12), 331–350. doi:10.2307/3858020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1980, Free to Choose: A Personal Statement. Harcourt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 2002, “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits,” In: T. Donaldson, P. Werhane and M. Cording (eds), Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, 7th edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, J. 1997. Political Philosophy. Westview, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, J.: 2006, ‹Business Ethics Without Stakeholders’, Business Ethics Quarterly 16(3), 533–557

  • Huyn, I. (2001). Authentic Values and Individual Autonomy. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 35(2), 195–208. doi:10.1023/A:1010347121641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, J. 1991, “The Quest for a Code of Professional Ethics: An Intellectual and Moral Confusion,” In: D. Johnson (eds), Ethical Issues in Engineering. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. pp. 130–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. 1974, Anarchy, State and Utopia. Harper Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand, A. 1964, The Virtue of Selfishness. Signet, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1993, Political Liberalism. Columbia U. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M.: 2006, ‹Cutting Health-Care Costs’, Stateside Dispatch. http://www.progressivestates.org/content/384/cutting-health-care-costs. Accessed 30 July 2008

  • Smith, A.: 2000, ‹Of the Accumulation of Capital, or of Productive and Unproductive Labor’, in An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. http://www.econlib.org/library/Smith/smWN8.html. Accessed 30 July 2008

  • Smith, A. 2008, “Benefits of the Profit Motive”. In: T. Donaldson, P. Werhane (eds), Ethical Issues in Business; A Philosophical Approach, 8th edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 163–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stieb, J.A. (2004). The Morality of Corporate Downsizing. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 23(3), 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoreau, H. D.: 1966 [1849], Walden and Civil Disobedience, in Owen Thomas (Norton, New York). Quoted in Bartleby.com, http://www.bartleby.com/73/753.html. Accessed 20 July 2008

  • Walsh, J. P.: 2005, ‹Book Review Essay: Taking Stock of Stakeholder Management’, Academy of Management Review 30(2), 426-438

  • Winterbottom v. Wright: 1998 [1842], Transcript. http://www.lawrence.edu/fast/boardmaw/Wntbtm_Wr.html. Accessed 30 July 2008

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James A. Stieb.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stieb, J.A. Assessing Freeman’s Stakeholder Theory. J Bus Ethics 87, 401–414 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9928-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9928-4

Keywords

Navigation