Abstract
At least since the publication of the monumental Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (1984), the “stakeholder theory” originated by R. E. Freeman has engrossed much of the business ethics literature. Subsequently, some advocates have moved a bit too quickly and without proper definition or argument. They have exceeded Freeman’s intentions which are more libertarian and free-market than is often thought. This essay focuses on the versions of stakeholder theory directly authored or coauthored by Freeman in an effort to recover (1) Freeman’s intentions and (2) the argumentative justification of stakeholder theory. It then argues that Freeman’s appeal to legal, economic, and ethical constraints ultimately produce arguments that are invalid. One can thoroughly support legislation constraining corporations or seeking to prevent age discrimination, market monopolies, and externalities and regret the extent that capitalism is heir to such shortcomings without it following that (1) business beneficiaries should be changed from stockholders to stakeholders and (2) the latter should be given serious decision-making power. Further, stakeholder theory neither defines nor battles any obvious opposition. Hence, it is difficult to see what it changes about business management. In short, stakeholder theory either changes too much about business, or nothing important at all (depending on one’s interpretation). Efforts to supplant or improve the reigning theory of capitalism will have to do better.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aristotle: 1985, Nichomachean Ethics, trans T. Irwin (Hackett, Indianapolis, IN)
Beauchamp, T., & Bowie, N. 2004, Ethical Theory and Business Seventh Edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Berle, A., & Means, G. 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Commerce Clearing House, New York.
Carrol, A.B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295. doi:10.1177/000765039903800303.
Chesher, J. E. and T. Machan: 1999, The Business of Commerce: Examining an Honorable Profession (Hoover Institution Press, Stanford, CA)
Conover, C. J.: 2004, ‹Health Care Regulation: A $169 Billion Hidden Tax’, Policy Analysis no. 527. The Cato Institute. http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=2466. Accessed 30 July 2008
Corporate Scandals: 2005, NOW website. Public Broadcasting Station. http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/corpscandalupdates.html Accessed 30 July 2008.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 1(20), 65–91. doi:10.2307/258887.
Donaldson, T. and P. Werhane (eds.): 2008, Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, 8th Edition (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
Donaldson, T., P. Werhane and M. Cording (eds.): 2002, Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, 7th Edition (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
Dunham L., R. E. Freeman and J. Leidtka: 2006, ‹Enhancing Stakeholder Practice: A Particularized Exploration of Community’ Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(1), 23–42. .
Freeman, R.E. 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pittman, Marshfield, MA.
Freeman, R. E.: 2002, ‹Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation’, in T. Donaldson and P. Werhane (eds.),␣Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, 7th Edition (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), pp.␣38–48
Freeman, R.E. 2008, “Managing for Stakeholders”. In: T. Donaldson, P. Werhane (eds), Ethical Issues in Business; A Philosophical Approach, 8th edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 39–53.
Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J.S., & Wicks, A.C. 2007, Managing for Stakeholders; Survival Reputation and Success. Yale U. Press, New Haven, CT.
Freeman, R.E., & Philips, R. (2002). Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 3(12), 331–350. doi:10.2307/3858020.
Friedman, M. 1980, Free to Choose: A Personal Statement. Harcourt, New York.
Friedman, M. 2002, “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits,” In: T. Donaldson, P. Werhane and M. Cording (eds), Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, 7th edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 33–38.
Hampton, J. 1997. Political Philosophy. Westview, Boulder, CO.
Heath, J.: 2006, ‹Business Ethics Without Stakeholders’, Business Ethics Quarterly 16(3), 533–557
Huyn, I. (2001). Authentic Values and Individual Autonomy. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 35(2), 195–208. doi:10.1023/A:1010347121641.
Ladd, J. 1991, “The Quest for a Code of Professional Ethics: An Intellectual and Moral Confusion,” In: D. Johnson (eds), Ethical Issues in Engineering. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. pp. 130–136.
Nozick, R. 1974, Anarchy, State and Utopia. Harper Basic Books, New York.
Rand, A. 1964, The Virtue of Selfishness. Signet, New York.
Rawls, J. 1993, Political Liberalism. Columbia U. Press, New York.
Singer, M.: 2006, ‹Cutting Health-Care Costs’, Stateside Dispatch. http://www.progressivestates.org/content/384/cutting-health-care-costs. Accessed 30 July 2008
Smith, A.: 2000, ‹Of the Accumulation of Capital, or of Productive and Unproductive Labor’, in An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. http://www.econlib.org/library/Smith/smWN8.html. Accessed 30 July 2008
Smith, A. 2008, “Benefits of the Profit Motive”. In: T. Donaldson, P. Werhane (eds), Ethical Issues in Business; A Philosophical Approach, 8th edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 163–167.
Stieb, J.A. (2004). The Morality of Corporate Downsizing. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 23(3), 61–67.
Thoreau, H. D.: 1966 [1849], Walden and Civil Disobedience, in Owen Thomas (Norton, New York). Quoted in Bartleby.com, http://www.bartleby.com/73/753.html. Accessed 20 July 2008
Walsh, J. P.: 2005, ‹Book Review Essay: Taking Stock of Stakeholder Management’, Academy of Management Review 30(2), 426-438
Winterbottom v. Wright: 1998 [1842], Transcript. http://www.lawrence.edu/fast/boardmaw/Wntbtm_Wr.html. Accessed 30 July 2008
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stieb, J.A. Assessing Freeman’s Stakeholder Theory. J Bus Ethics 87, 401–414 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9928-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9928-4