Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T17:27:33.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Against Matricide: Rethinking Subjectivity and the Maternal Body

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Alison Stone
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article I critically re‐examine Julia Kristeva's view that becoming a speaking subject requires psychical matricide: violent separation from the maternal body. I propose an alternative, non‐matricidal conception of subjectivity, in part by drawing out anti‐matricidal strands in Kristeva's own thought, including her view that early mother–child relations are triangular. Whereas she understands this triangle in terms of a first imaginary father, I re‐interpret this triangle using Donald Winnicott's idea of potential space and Jessica Benjamin's idea of an intersubjective space of thirdness. I argue that this space provides a maternal third term: a relation of connection and difference between two, a relation that inherits the affective, mobile, generative qualities of the maternal body as the infant (according to Kristeva) imagines it. This connecting space allows both mothers and children to emerge as subjects in their own right. I then suggest that potential‐maternal space expands into language, so that language intrinsically allows the possibility of a speaking position of connection with the mother. Entrance into language need not entail separation or matricide: the problem is not language as such but the particular way that speech and logos have been defined historically.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , Winter 2012 , pp. 118 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baraitser, Lisa. 2008. Maternal encounters: The ethics of interruption. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beardsworth, Sara. 2004. Julia Kristeva: Psychoanalysis and modernity. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Beardsworth, Sara. 2009. Love's lost labors: Subjectivity, art, and politics. In Psychoanalysis, aesthetics, and politics in the work of Julia Kristeva, ed. Oliver, Kelly and Keltner, S.K.Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Jessica. 1986. A desire of one's own: Psychoanalytic feminism and intersubjective space. In Feminist studies/critical studies, ed. de Lauretis, Teresa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Jessica. 1988. The bonds of love: Psychoanalysis, feminism, and the problem of domination. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Jessica. 1995. Like subjects, love objects: Essays on recognition and sexual difference. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Jessica. 2005. What mothers and babies need: The maternal third and its presence in clinical work. In What do mothers want? Developmental perspectives, clinical challenges, ed. Brown, Sheila Feig. Hillsdale, N.J.: Analytic Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2005. Giving an account of oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Marneffe, Daphne. 2004. Maternal desire. New York: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Gambaudo, Sylvie. 2007. Kristeva, psychoanalysis and culture: Subjectivity in crisis. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1991. The bodily encounter with the mother. In The Irigaray Reader, ed. Whitford, Margaret. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Amber. 2007. On matricide: Myth, psychoanalysis, and the law of the mother. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1982. Powers of horror: An essay on abjection. Trans. Léon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1984. Revolution in poetic language. Trans. Margaret Waller. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1987. Tales of love. Trans. Léon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1989. Black sun: Depression and melancholia. Trans. Léon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1996. Interviews. Ed. and trans. Ross Guberman. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 2000. The sense and non‐sense of revolt. Trans. Jeanine Herman. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 2001. Melanie Klein. Trans. Ross Guberman. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Laplanche, Jean. 1999. Essays on otherness. Trans. John Fletcher. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Margaroni, Maria. 2005. “The lost foundation”: Kristeva's semiotic chora and its ambiguous legacy. Hypatia 20(1): 78–98.Google Scholar
McAfee, Noëlle. 2000. Habermas, Kristeva, and citizenship. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, Kelly. 1993. Reading Kristeva: Unraveling the double‐bind. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, Kelly. 2000. Conflicted love. Hypatia 15(3): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Söderbäck, Fanny. 2009. Motherhood: A site of repression or liberation? Butler and Kristeva on the maternal body. http://mamsie.wikispaces.com/M(o)ther+Trouble+Programme (accessed December 6, 2010).Google Scholar
Sofia, Zoë. 2000. Container technologies. Hypatia 15(2): 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Daniel. 1985. The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Weir, Allison. 1993. Identification with the divided mother: Kristeva's ambivalence. In Ethics, politics and difference in Julia Kristeva's writing, ed. Oliver, Kelly. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Winnicott, Donald W. 1975. Through paediatrics to psycho‐analysis. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Ziarek, Ewa. 1993. Kristeva and Levinas: Mourning, ethics, and the feminine. In Ethics, politics, and difference in Julia Kristeva's writing, ed. Oliver, Kelly. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar