Abstract
In this paper, I argue that there are good motivations for a relativist account of the domain-sensitivity of quantifier phrases. I will frame the problem as a puzzle involving what looks like a logically valid inference, yet one whose premises are true while the conclusion is false. After discussing some existing accounts, literalist and contextualist, I will present and argue for an account that may be said to be relativistin the following sense: (i) a domain of quantification is required for determining truth value, but is idle in determining semantic content, and (ii) the same sentence, as used on one and the same occasion, may receive different truth values relative to different domains.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bach K. et al (1994) Seemingly semantic intuitions. In: Campbell J. (eds) Meaning and truth. Seven Bridges Press, New York, pp 21–33
Davidson D. (1968). On saying that. In Inquiries into truth and interpretation (pp. 93–108). Oxford: Clarendon Press (1984).
Egan A., Hawthorne J., Weatherson B. (2005) Epistemic modals in context. In: Preyer G., Peter G. (eds) Contextualism in philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 131–168
Gillon B. (2008) On the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Synthese 165: 373–384
Kaplan, D. (1989) Demonstratives: an essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In J. Almog, J. Perry, & H. Wettstein (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan (pp. 481–563), Oxford University Press.
Kuhn S. (1980) Quantifiers as modal operators. Studia Logica 39: 145–158
Lewis S. (1980) Index, context and content. In: Kanger S., Ohman S. (eds) Philosophy and grammar. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 78–100
MacFarlane J. (2003) Future contingents and relative truth. The Philosophical Quarterly 53: 321–336
MacFarlane J. (2005) Making sense of relative truth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105: 321–339
MacFarlane, J. (2007). Nonindexical contextualism. Synthese. doi:10.1007/s11229-007-9286-2.
Peters S., Westerståhl D. (2006) Quantifiers in language and logic. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Predelli S. (2005) Contexts: Meaning, truth, and the use of language. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Predelli S., Stojanovic I. (2008) Semantic relativism and the logic of indexicals. In: García-Carpintero M., Kölbel M. (eds) Relative truth. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 63–80
Recanati F. (2004) Literal meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Stanley J. (2000) Context and logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 391–434
Stanley J., Szabo Z. (2000) On quantifier domain restriction. Mind and Language 15: 219–261
Stanley J., Williamson T. (1995) Quantifiers and context-dependence. Analysis 55: 291–295
Stojanovic I. (2007) What is said as lexical meaning. Cadernos de Filosofia 21: 7–42
Stojanovic I. (2008) What is said: an inquiry into reference, meaning, and content. VDM Verlag, Saarbrücken
Westerståhl D. (1985) Determiners and context sets. In: van Benthem J., ter Meulen A. (eds) Generalized quantifiers in natural language. Foris, Dordrecht, pp 45–71
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stojanovic, I. Domain-sensitivity. Synthese 184, 137–155 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9729-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9729-z