Skip to main content
Log in

Modern to postmodern: Social construction, dissonance, and education

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modernist educational practice operates within an overarching norm of consonance, notions of sameness and agreement that permeate schools and classroom life. This paper posits a needed move to postmodern educational theory and practice through dissonance. Following an intellectual contextualization, two sets of philosophical claims are presented. The first promotes social construction of reality and the second poses dissonance rather than consonance. The paper concludes with a “look” at education from this postmodern perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aronowitz, S. and Giroux, H.: 1991.Postmodern Education: Politics, Culture and Social Criticism, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. and Luckmann, T.: 1966,The Social Construction of Reality, Doubleday, Garden City, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S. and Gintis, H.: 1976,Schooling in Capitalist America, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherryholmes, C.: 1988,Power and Criticism, Teachers College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, W.: 1993,Political Theory and Modernity, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lauretis, T.: 1986,Feminist Studies/Critical Studies, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M.: 1977a,Discipline and Punishment, Vintage Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M.: 1970–71/1977b, “History of Systems of Thought,” in D. Bouchard (ed.), B. Bouchard and S. Simon (trans.),Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M.: 1984, “What is Enlightenment?”, in P. Rabinow (ed.),The Foucault Reader, Pantheon Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P.: 1971,Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Continuum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H.: 1983, “Theories of Reproduction and Resistance in a New Sociology of Education: A Critical Analysis”,Harvard Educational Review 53, 257–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N.:Ways of Worldmaking, Hackett, Indianapolis, IN.

  • Gramsci, A.: 1930?/1971,Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, Q. Hoare and G. Nowell (eds.), Lawrence & Wishart, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.: 1983, “Modernity-An Incomplete Project”, in Foster (ed.),The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture, Bay Press, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, N.: 1958,Patterns of Discovery, The University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheon, L. 1988.:A Poetics of Postmodernism, Routledge, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P.: 1991,Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy With/in the Postmodern, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leotard, J.: 1984,The Post-Modern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, G. Bennington and B. Masumi (trans.), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, C. and Crichlow, W. (eds.),: 1993.Race, Identity, and Representation in Education, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, B.: 1992,Teaching the Postmodern: Fiction and Theory, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N.: 1991,Getting Personal: Feminist Occasions and Other Autobiographical Acts, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N.: 1989,Women and Evil, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T.: 1991,A Political Sociology of Educational Reform: Power/Knowledge in Teaching, Teacher Education, and Research, Teachers College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (ed.): 1967/1992,The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R.:Contingency, Irony and Solidarity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Shapiro, M.: 1992.:Reading the Postmodern Polity: Political Theory as Textual Practice, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G., with S. Harasym (ed.): 1990,The Post-Colonial Critic, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, L.: 1992a, Book review, A Political Sociology of Educational Reform,Educational Studies 23, 487–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, L.: 1992b, “Essentialist Tensions in Reflective Teaching”, in L. Valli (ed.),Reflective Teacher Education: Case Studies and Critiques, State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, L.: 1993a, “Contingency: The Constancy of Teaching”,Teachers College Record 94, 815–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, L.: 1993b, “Disavowing Community”, inPhilosophy of Education: 1992, Philosophy of Education Society and Illinois State University, Normal, Il.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S.: 1990,Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis, L. and M. Fine (eds.): 1993,Beyond Silenced Voices: Race, Class and Gender in United States Schools, State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I.: 1990, “The Ideal of Community and the Politics of Difference”, in L. Nicholson (ed.),Feminism/Postmodernism, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stone, L. Modern to postmodern: Social construction, dissonance, and education. Stud Philos Educ 13, 49–63 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074085

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074085

Keywords

Navigation