Scientific Irrationalism: Origins of a Postmodern Cult

Front Cover
Transaction Publishers, 2001 - Philosophy - 218 pages

Little known outside his native Australia, David Stove was one of the most illuminating and brilliant philosophical essayists of his era. A fearless attacker of intellectual and cultural orthodoxies, Stove left powerful critiques of scientific irrationalism, Darwinian theories of human behavior, and philosophical idealism.

Since its inception in the 1940s, the field of science studies, originally intended to bridge the gap between science and the humanities, has been the center of controversy and debate. The most notable figures in this debate are Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper. In "Scientific Irrationalism," now available in paperback, David Stove demonstrates how extravagant has been the verbiage wasted on this issue and how irrational the combatants have been. He shows that Kuhn and Popper share considerable common ground. Stove argues that the problems all reside in the reasoning of the critics. He identifies the logical mistakes and conceptual allusions made by Kuhn and Popper and their supporters, as well as their collective dependency on a single argument made by the philosopher of the Scottish Enlightenment, David Hume. He then demonstrates how little potency that argument actually has for the claims of science.

In his foreword, Keith Windschuttle explains the debate surrounding the field of science studies and explores David Stove's contribution as well as his lack of recognition. In an afterword, James Franklin discusses reactions to Stove's work.

 

Contents

III
23
IV
53
V
91
VII
93
IX
113
X
163
XI
197
XII
201
XIII
210
XIV
217
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 13 - It has thus become increasingly apparent that physical 'reality', no less than social 'reality', is at bottom a social and linguistic construct; that scientific 'knowledge', far from being objective, reflects and encodes the dominant ideologies and power relations of the culture that produced it; that the truth claims...
Page 8 - earth" was fixed position. Their earth, at least, could not be moved. Correspondingly, Copernicus' innovation was not simply to move the earth. Rather, it was a whole new way of regarding the problems of physics and astronomy, one that necessarily changed the meaning of both "earth
Page 5 - As in political revolutions, so in paradigm choice— there is no standard higher than the assent of the relevant community.
Page 7 - Thus, while an American can now choose the religion he likes, he is still not permitted to demand that his children learn magic rather than science at school. There is a separation between state and Church, there is no separation between state and science'.

References to this book

About the author (2001)

David Stove (1927-1994) taught philosophy at the University of New South Wales and the University of Sydney. He was a critic of sociobiology, Marxism, feminism, and postmodernism. He is the author of numerous books, including The Rationality of Induction; What’s Wrong with Benevolence: Happiness, Private Property, and the Limits of Enlightenment; and Against the Idols of the Age.

Bibliographic information