Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical Decision Making: The Effects of Escalating Commitment

Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the recent emergence of many new ethical decision making models, there has been minimal emphasis placed on the impact of escalating commitment on the ethical decision making process. In this paper a new variable is introduced into the ethical decision making literature. This variable, exposure to escalation situations, is posited to increase the likelihood that individuals will choose unethical decision alternatives. Further, it is proposed that escalation situations should be included as a variable in Jones's (1991) comprehensive model of ethical decision making. Finally, research propositions are provided based on the relationship between escalating commitment and the ethical decision making process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brockner, J.: 1992, ‘The Escalation of Commitment to a Failing Course of Action: Toward Theoretical Progress’, Academy of Management 17, 39–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C. and L. C. Gresham: 1985, ‘A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 49, 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L.: 1957, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Row, Peterson, Evanston, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraedrich, J. P. and P. C. Ferrell: 1992, ‘The Impact of Perceived Risk and Moral Philosophy Type on Ethical Decision Making in Business Organizations’, Journal of Business Research 24, 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D. J. and H. Becker: 1984, ‘Linking Management Behavior to Ethical Philosophy: An Empirical Investigation’, Academy of Management Journal 27, 164–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, D. J.: 1991, ‘A Model of Decision-Making Incorporating Ethical Values’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 841–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. and S. Vitell: 1986, ‘A General Theory of Marketing Ethics’, Journal of MacroMarketing (Spring), 5–16.

  • Jones, T. M.: 1991, ‘Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model’, Academy of Management Review 16, 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky: 1979, ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions under Risk’, Econometrica 43, 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1969, ‘Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach to Socialization’, in D. A. Goslin (ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (Rand McNally, Chicago), pp. 347–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, N.: 1994, ‘Ethics in Organizations: A Framework for Theory and Research’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 581–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1979, Development in Judging Moral Issues (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. and B. M. Staw: 1986, ‘Expo 86: An Escalation Prototype’, Administrative Science Quarterly 31, 274–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. and B. M. staw: 1993, ‘Organizational Escalation and Exit: Lessons from the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant’, Academy of Management Journal 36, 701–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaubroeck, J. and S. Williams: 1993, ‘Type A Behavior Pattern and Escalating Commitment’, Journal of Applied Psychology 78, 862–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. M.: 1981, ‘The Escalation of Commitment to a Course of Action’, Academy of Management Review 6, 577–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B.: 1976, ‘Knee-Deep in the Big Muddy: A Study of Escalating Commitment to a Chosen Course of Action’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16, 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. and J. Ross: 1987, ‘Behavior in Escalation Situations: Antecedents, Prototypes, and Solutions’, in L. L. Cummings and B. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. and H. Hoang: 1995, ‘Sunk Costs in the NBA: Why Draft Order Affects Playing Time and Survival in Professional Basketball’, Administrative Science Quarterly 40, 474–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, K. C. and G. D. Meyer: 1992, ‘An Integrative Descriptive Model of Ethical Decision Making’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K.: 1986, ‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model’, Academy of Management Review 11, 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, K. M. and O. C. Ferrell: 1977, ‘The Impact of Corporate Policy on Reported Ethical Reliefs and Behavior of Marketing Practitioners’, American Marketing Association Proceedings 41, 477–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, G.: 1986, ‘Diffusion of Responsibility: Effects on the Escalation Tendency’, Journal of Applied Psychology 76(3).

  • Whyte, G.: 1989, ‘Groupthink Reconsidered’, Academy of Management Review 14, 40–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, G.: 1993, ‘Escalating Commitment in Individual and Group Decision Making: A Prospect Theory Approach’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 54, 430–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zey-Ferrell, M. K., M. Weaver, and O. C. Ferrell: 1979, ‘Predicting Unethical Behavior Among Marketing Practitioners’, Human Relations 32, 557–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zey-Ferrell, M. and O. C. Ferrell: 1982, ‘Role Set Configuration and Opportunity as Predictors of Unethical Behavior in Organizations’, Human Relations 35, 587–604.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Street, M.D., Robertson, C. & Geiger, S.W. Ethical Decision Making: The Effects of Escalating Commitment. Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1153–1161 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005701823810

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005701823810

Keywords

Navigation