Skip to main content
Log in

THE* Rules of Stakeholder Satisfaction (* Timeliness, Honesty, Empathy)

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results of an exploratory study examining the role of trust in stakeholder satisfaction are reported. Customers, stockholders, and employees of financial institutions were surveyed to identify management behaviors that lead to stakeholder satisfaction. The factors critical to satisfaction across stakeholder groups are the timeliness of communication, the honesty and completeness of the information and the empathy and equity of treatment by management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brockner, J. and P. Siegel: 1996, ‘Understanding the Interaction Between Procedural and Distributive Justice: The Role of Trust’, in R. M. Kramer andT. R. Tyler (eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), pp. 390–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Castro, J. O., G. D. Meyer,K. C. Strong andN. Uhlenbruck: 1996, ‘Government Objectives and Organizational Characteristics: A Stakeholder View of Privatization Effectiveness’, International Journal of Organizational Analysis 4(4), 373–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T.: 1999, ‘Response: Making Stakeholder Theory Whole’, Academy of Management Review 24(2), 237–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1999, ‘Response: Divergent Stakeholder Theory’, Academy of Management Review 24(2), 233–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pittman, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardial, S., D. S. Clemons,R. B. Woodruff,D. W. Schuman andM. J. Burns: 1994, ‘Comparing Consumers Recall of Prepurchase and Postpurchase Product Evaluation Experiences’, Journal of Consumer Research 24 (March), 548–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A.: 1999, ‘Response: Practicability, Paradigms, and Problems in Stakeholder Theorizing’, Academy of Management Review 24(2), 228–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J.: 1990, ‘Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow’, Journal of Management 16, 399–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huse, M. and D. Eide: 1996, ‘Stakeholder Management and the Avoidance of Corporate Control’, Business and Society 35(2), 211–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B. W.: 1998, ‘Organizational Justice and the Management of Stakeholder Relations’, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 643–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M., and A. C. Wicks: 1999, ‘Convergent Stakeholder Theory’, Academy of Management Review 24(2), 206–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laban, R. and H. C. Wolf: 1993, ‘Large Scale Privatization in Transition Economies’, American Economic Review 83, 1199–1210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S., J. Karuza andW. R. Fry: 1980, ‘Beyond Fairness: A Theory of Allocation Preferences’, in G. Mikula (ed.), Justice and Social Interaction (Springer-Verlag, New York), pp. 167–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, K. R.: 1993, ‘Why Privatization Is Not Enough’, Harvard Business Review 71(3), 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. L.: 1993, ‘Cognitive, Affective, and Attribute Bases of the Satisfaction Response’, Journal of Consumer Research 20 (December), 418–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A.,V. A. Zeithaml andL. L. Berry: 1985, ‘A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research’, Journal of Marketing 49 (Fall), 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P. S.: 1996, ‘Fragile and Resilient Trust and Their Roles in Economic Exchange’, Business and Society 35(2), 148–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreng, R. A., S. B. MacKenzie andR. W. Olshavsky: 1996, ‘A Reexamination of the Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction’, Journal of Marketing 60(3), 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. A.: 1993, ‘The Roles of Service Quality, Consumer Satisfaction, and Value in Quinn's (1992) Paradigm of Services’, The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 2(1) (Fall), 14–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K. andG. R. Weaver: 1999, ‘Response: The Stakeholder Research Tradition” Converging Theorists-Not Convergent Theory’, Academy of Management Review 24(2), 222–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A. andS. B. Graves: 1997, ‘Quality of Management and Quality of Stakeholder Relations: Are They Synonymous?’, Business and Society 36(3), 250–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welbourne, T. M. 1998: “Untangling Procedural and Distributive Justice”, Group & Organization Management 23, 325–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, R. A.,J. W. Newman andJ. R. Taylor: 1978, ‘Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction in the Purchase Decision Process’, Journal of Marketing 42 (October), 54–60.

  • Wood, D. J. and R. E. Jones: 1995, ‘Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance’, International Journal of Organizational Analysis 3(3), 229–267.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strong, K.C., Ringer, R.C. & Taylor, S.A. THE* Rules of Stakeholder Satisfaction (* Timeliness, Honesty, Empathy). Journal of Business Ethics 32, 219–230 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010714703936

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010714703936

Navigation