REVIEW: James R. Brown, Laboratory of the Mind

Authors

  • Michael T. Stuart IHPST, University of Toronto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4245/sponge.v6i1.15820

Abstract

Originally published in 1991, "The Laboratory of the Mind: Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences" is the first monograph to identify and address some of the many interesting questions that pertain to thought experiments. While the putative aim of the book is to explore the nature of thought experimental evidence, it has another important purpose which concerns the crucial role thought experiments play in Brown’s Platonic master argument. In that argument, Brown argues against naturalism and empiricism (Brown 2012), for mathematical Platonism (Brown 2008), and from the Platonist-friendly, abstract universals posited by the Dretske-Tooley-Armstrong (DTA) account of the laws of nature to a more general, physical Platonism. "The Laboratory of the Mind" is where he takes this final step.

Author Biography

Michael T. Stuart, IHPST, University of Toronto

Mike is a Ph.D. candidate in his third year at the University of Toronto’s IHPST. He is primarily interested in philosophy of science and the epistemology of thought experiments.

Downloads

Published

2012-10-04

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2012): Visual Representation and Science

Section

Reviews

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: (a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. (b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. (c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.