Skip to main content
Log in

Choice Functions: Rationality re-Examined

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On analyzing the problem that arises whenever the set of maximal elements is large, and a selection is then required (see Peris & Subiza 1998), we realize that logical ways of selecting among maximals violate the classical notion and axioms of rationality. We arrive at the same conclusion if we analyze solutions to the problem of choosing from a tournament (where maximal elements do not necessarily exist). So, in our opinion the notion of rationality must be discussed, not only in the traditional sense of external conditions (Sen 1993), but in terms of the internal information provided by the binary relation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Copeland, A.H. (1951), A reasonable social welfare function. Mimeo.

  • Deb, R. (1983), Binariness and rational choice, Mathematical Social Sciences 5: 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, B. (1988), Covering sets and a new condorcet choice correspondence, Journal of Economic Theory 44: 63–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, B. and Laslier, J.F. (1999), Comparison functions and choice correspondences. Mimeo.

  • Fishburn, P.C. (1977), Condorcet social choice functions, SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 33: 469–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriet, D. (1985), The Copeland choice functions: an axiomatic characterization, Social Choice and Welfare 2: 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffond, G., Laslier, J.F. and Le Breton, M. (1993), The bipartisan set of a tournament game, Games and Economic Behavior 5: 182–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. (1956), Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination, Econometrica 24: 178–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N.R. (1977), Graph theoretical approaches to the theory of voting, American Journal of Political Sciences 21: 769–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, H. (1985), Choice functions over a finite set: a summary, Social Choice and Welfare 2: 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, H. (1986), Choosing from a tournament, Social Choice and Welfare 3: 271–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peris, J.E. and Subiza, B. (1998), Choosing among maximals, A Discusión, w.p. Universitat d'Alacant.

  • Peris, J.E. and Subiza, B. (1999), Condorcet choice correspondences for weak tournaments, Social Choice and Welfare 16: 217–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, T. (1986), The Logic of Collective Choice, Columbia University Press.

  • Sen, A.K. (1993), Internal consistency of choice, Econometrica 61(3): 495–521.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Subiza, B., Peris, J.E. Choice Functions: Rationality re-Examined. Theory and Decision 48, 287–304 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005202626761

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005202626761

Navigation