Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-30T04:21:20.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: Popper's Variant of the EPR Experiment Does Not Test the Copenhagen Interpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

A. Sudbery
A. Sudbery*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , September 1985 , pp. 470 - 476
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aspect, A.; Dalibard, J.; and Roger, G. (1982), “Experimental Test of Bell's Inequality Using Time-varying Analyzers”, Physical Review Letters 49: 1804–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspect, A.; Grangier, P.; and Roger, G. (1982), “Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell's Inequalities”, Physical Review Letters 49: 91–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clauser, J. F., and Shimony, A. (1978), “Bell's Theorem—Experimental Test and Implications”, Reports on Progress in Physics 41: 1881–1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d'Espagnat, B. (1979), “The Quantum Theory and Reality”, Scientific American 241 (No. 5): 158–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirac, P. A. M. (1958), The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A.; Podolsky, B.; and Rosen, N. (1935), “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?” Physical Review 47: 777–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghirardi, G. C.; Rimini, A.; and Weber, T. (1980), “A General Argument Against Superluminal Transmission through the Quantum Mechanical Measurement Process”, Lettere al Nuovo Cimento 27: 293–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1982a), Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1982b), The Open Universe. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1982c), Realism and the Aim of Science. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1982d), “Proposal for a simplified new variant of the experiment of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen” in Physik, Philosophie und Politik, Meyer-Abich, (ed.). Munich: Carl Hanser.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1944), Philsophic Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wigner, E. P. (1970), “On Hidden Variables and Quantum Mechanical Probabilities”, American Journal of Physics 38: 1005–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar